设计科学:从规范性到描述性

doi:10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2017.22.003

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (5)

全文: PDF (660 KB) HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要论述了目前关于设计科学的不同观点，探讨了重要设计理论的特点。分析表明，目前设计理论集中在应当如何做而缺乏对客观规律的探索。设计科学不仅是采用科学的方法研究设计，而且作为一门科学，设计科学应具备科学的一般属性，即探索客观规律和发展描述性理论。描述性设计理论可为设计理论和方法提供依据，为提高设计效率和设计质量提供指导。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	侯悦民
	季林红

关键词 ：设计科学, 规范性, 描述性, 设计理论

Abstract：The design is both an art and a science. The design science focuses on the science part of the design, including the studies of the designers and the interaction between the people and the created artifacts in the society, and the studies of the structures and their behaviors. There is no clear boundary between these two domains, and the Science is what they share. The design as a science should follow the scientific research paradigm and investigate design laws with descriptive theories. The current design research tends to provide normative methods, which can work in certain cases but cannot be extended to general design cases. Normative methods prescribe what the designers OUGHT to do, while descriptive theories tell us what IS behind the design practices. The normative methods can work in certain cases but not in general cases. They are necessary for the design because the design is a goal-oriented activity. However, only after we understand what IS behind the different design practices can we construct effective design methods to guide better design. In the case of computer design systems, the normative methods lead to the design automation, but only descriptive theories can pave the way to the autonomous design or the partially autonomous design.

Key words： design science normative descriptive design theory

收稿日期: 2017-09-15

基金资助:北京市自然科学基金项目（3172014）；国家自然科学基金项目（2011ZX02403）

作者简介: 侯悦民,博士,研究方向为设计科学、生物启发的设计理论和算法,电子信箱:hym01@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn

引用本文:

侯悦民, 季林红. 设计科学:从规范性到描述性[J]. 科技导报, 2017, 35(22): 25-34.
HOU Yuemin, JI Linhong. Design science:From normative towards descriptions. Science & Technology Review, 2017, 35(22): 25-34.

链接本文:

http://www.kjdb.org/CN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2017.22.003 或 http://www.kjdb.org/CN/Y2017/V35/I22/25

[1] Hubka V, Eder W. Theory of technical systems:A total concept theory of engineering design[M]. Dordrecht:Springer, 1988.
[2] Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, et al. Engineering design:A systematic approach[M]. Springer, 2007.
[3] Simon H. Sciences of the artificial[M]. 3rd ed. Cambridge:MIT Press, 1996.
[4] Cross N. Forty years of design research[J]. Design Studies, 2007:28(1):1-4.
[5] Andreasen M M, McAloone T C. Applications of the theory of technical systems-Experiences from the "Copenhagen School"[C]//AEDS 2008 Workshop, Pilsen-Czech Republic, 1 October-1 November 2008.
[6] Pinkawa M, Asadpour B, Piroth M D, et al. Health-related quality of life after permanent I-125 brachytherapy and conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer-A matched-pair comparison[J]. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2009, 91(2):225-231.
[7] Papalambros P Y. Design science:Why, what and how[J]. Design Science, 2015(1):1-38.
[8] Grant D P. Design methodology and design methods[J]. Design Methods and Theories, 13(1):46-47.
[9] Cross N. Designerly ways of knowing:Design discipline versus design science[J]. Design Issues, 2001, 17(3):49-55.
[10] Laurillard D. Teaching as a design science:Can we unlock the power of technology[C]//The CDE's Research and Innovation in Distance Education and eLearning conference, Senate House London, 19 October 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh9254T2ZYg.
[11] Warfield J N. A science of generic design:Managing complexity through systems design[M]. Iowa State Press, 1994.
[12] 赵伟. 广义设计学的研究范式危机与转向——从"设计科学"到"设计研究"[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2012.
[13] 陈玉和. 论设计作为设计科学的教育学[J]. 西南交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 16(1):1-18.
[14] 陈玉和. 设计科学:引领未来发展的科学[J]. 山东科技大学学报, 2012, 14(4):1-10.
[15] 赵伟, 夏缘缘. 设计科学还是设计学科[J]. 艺术探索, 2016, 30(4):98-102.
[16] 武夷山.管理学是设计科学[N].学习时报, 2007-06-04.
[17] 刘兴华. 管理研究的设计科学探讨[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010(5):71-75.
[18] 柳冠中. 设计"设计学"——"人为事物" 的科学[J]. 南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计), 2000(1):52-57.
[19] 柳冠中. 设计方法论——认识论[EB/OL]. 2016-01-08. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/187e67be02768e9950e73845.html.
[20] 侯悦民, 季林红, 金德闻. 设计的科学属性及核心[J]. 科学技术与辩证法, 2007, 24(3):23-28.
[21] Aristotle. Metaphysics[M]. Ross W D. trans. https://classics.mit.edu/Browse/browse-Aristotle.html.
[22] 亚里士多德. 形而上学卷[M]. 苗力田, 译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2000.
[23] 谢友柏. 设计科学中的四个基本定律[EB/OL]. 2016-07-08. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/78c3efecbb68a98270fefa23.html.
[24] 谢友柏. 设计科学的争论和设计竞争力[J]. 中国工程科学, 2014(8):4-13.
[25] Gabel M. Introduction:Design science[C]//Ho-Ping. Food for Everyone. Doubleday, 1979:10-11. http://designsciencelab.com/resources/DesignScience-Intro.pdf.
[26] 卡尔波普尔. 科学发现的逻辑[M]. 查汝强, 邱仁宗, 万木春, 译. 北京:中国美术学院出版社, 2007.
[27] Behdad S, Berg L P, Thurston D, et al. Synergy between normative and descriptive design theory and methodology[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2013, August 4-7, 2013, Portland, Oregon, USA, 1-15. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=me_conf.
[28] Ng K W. A critical analysis of current engineering design methodologies from a decision making perspective[C]//Intelligent Production Machines and Systems, edited by Duc T. Pham, Eldaw E. Eldukhri, Anthony J. Soroka. Elsevier, 2006, July 3-14. 369-374. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.335.7372&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[29] Goel A K, Vattam S, Wiltgen B, et al. Chapter 6:Information-processing theories of biologically inspired design in biologically inspired design:Computational methods and tools[M]. London:Springer-Verlag, 2014:127-152.
[30] Finger S, Dixon J. A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part 1:descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes[J]. Res Eng Des, 1989(1):51-67.
[31] Rzevski G. On the design of a design methodology[M]. U K:Westbury House, 1981.
[32] Warfield J N. Domain of science model:Evolution and design[C]. Proceedings of the Society for General Systems Research, 1986.
[33] Hubka V. Theorie technischer systeme[M]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 1984.
[34] Gero J S, Kannengiesser U. A function-behaviour-structure ontology of processes[C]. Design Computing and Cognition'06, Springer Netherlands. 2006:407-422.
[35] Umeda Y, Kondoh S, Shimomura Y, et al. Development of design methodology for upgradable products based on function-behaviorstate modeling[J]. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2005, 19(3):161-182.
[36] Wiltgen B, Goel A K. Functional model simulation for evaluating design concepts[J]. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 2016(4):151-168.
[37] Hatchuel A, Weil B. C-K theory:Notions and applications of a unified design theory[C]//Herbert Simon International Conference on "Design Science". Lyon (France), 15-16 March 2002, 1-22.
[38] Gero J S, Kannengiesser U. The situated function-behaviour-structure framework[J]. Design Studies, 2004:25(4), 373-391.
[39] Altshuller G S. Creativity as an exact science:The theory of the solution of inventive problems[M]. Luxembourg:Gordon and Branch Publishers, 1984.
[40] Suh N P, Bell A C, Gossard D C. On an axiomatric approach to manufacturing and manufacturing systems[J]. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1978, 100(2):127-130.
[41] Suh N P. A theory of complexity, periodicity and the design axioms[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 1999(11):116-131.
[42] 肖人彬, 蔡池兰, 刘勇. 公理设计的研究现状与问题分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2008, 44(12):1-11.
[43] Hansson S O. Decision theory:A brief introduction[J]. Techniques of Automation & Applications, 2005, 12(3):1-94.
[44] Over D. Rationality and the normative/descriptive distinction[EB/OL]. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Derek J. Koehler, Nigel Harvey, ed. 2007. http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405157599_chunk_g97814051575993.
[45] Philosophy index-normative[EB/OL]. 2017-07-10. http://www.philosophy-index.com/terms/normative.php.
[46] Baron J. The point of normative models in judgment and decision making[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2012(3):577. doi:10.3389fpsyg.2012. 00577. 2012:1-7.
[47] Keller L R. Decision research with descriptive, normative, and prescriptive purposes-Some comments[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 1989(19):485-487.
[48] List Christian. Levels:descriptive, explanatory, and ontological[EB/OL]. 2016(1):1-35. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12040.
[49] List C. Levels:descriptive, explanatory, and ontological[EB/OL]. 2016, http://personal.lse.ac.uk/list/pdf-files/Levels.pdf.
[50] Ricciardi F, Baskerville. Design and normative claims in organization studies:A methodological proposal[J]. Designing Organizational Systems, Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation 1. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33371-2_2, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013.
[51] Pan Y, Burnap A. Deep design:Product aesthetics for heterogeneous markets[C]//Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, v Part F129685, 1961-1970, August 13, 2017.
[52] Simon H A. 人工科学[M]. 武夷山, 译. 北京:商务印书馆, 1987.
[53] Hume D, The treatise of human nature, Book Ⅲ:"Of Morals"[EB/OL]. http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/hume/section3.rhtml.
[54] Watsonm B. Ought and is[EB/OL]. 2013-09-01. https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/ought-and-is.
[55] Winkelman P. Description, prescription and "bad" design[C]//International Conference On Engineering Design, ICED11. 15-18 August 2011, Technical University Of Denmark.
[56] Popper K. Three worlds[C]. The tanner lecture on human values, delivered at The University of Michigan, April 7, 1978.