Abstract：In this paper, a dynamic fault tree model was first applied to evaluate safety of the engine lubrication system with faulttolerance and redundancy configuration. Using the dynamic fault tree and classical fault tree methods, a typical failure condition of the lubrication system was modeled and analyzed. The results show that the classical fault tree model cannot quantify the dynamic behavior aspect of system safety in a reasonable fashion, and prediction of failure probability deviates far from the actual situation (analytical errors up to 20 times). Meanwhile, the dynamic fault tree model not only correctly describes the sequence-based failure conditions, but also efficiently yields better quantitative failure probability calculation, demonstrating that dynamic fault tree model will have high potential in safety analysis of engine systems.
[1] 赵廷弟. 安全性设计分析与验证[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2011: 158-159. Zhao Tingdi. Safety design analysis and verification[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2011: 158-159.
[2] 罗云林, 张巨联, 杨剑忠. 基于马尔可夫方法的飞控系统安全性评估[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2011, 29(4): 16-19. Luo Yunlin, Zhang Julian, Yang Jianzhong. Safety assessment research of flight control system based on MA model[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2011, 29(4): 16-19.
[3] 张晓洁, 赵海涛, 苗强, 等. 基于动态故障树的卫星系统可靠性分析[J]. 宇航学报, 2009, 30(3): 1249-1255. Zhang Xiaojie, Zhao Haitao, Miao Qiang, et al. Reliability analysis of satellite system based on dynamic fault tree[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2009, 30(3): 1249-1255.
[4] 王新阁, 张显余, 张艳敬, 等. 某型运输机飞控计算机动态故障树分析[J]. 飞机设计, 2011, 31(4): 69-73. Wang Xinge, Zhang Xianyu, Zhang Yanjing, et al. Dynamic fault tree analysis of flight control computer for some type transporter[J]. Aircraft Design, 2011, 31(4): 69-73.
[5] Manian R, Coppit D W, Sullivan K J, et al. Bridging the gap between systems and dynamic fault tree models[C]//Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. Washington: IEEE, 1999, 105-111.
[6] Long W, Sato Y, Horigome M. Quantification of sequential failure logic of fault tree analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2000, 67: 269-274.
[7] 徐亨成, 张建国. 基于BDD技术下的故障树重要度分析[J]. 电子机械 工程, 2003, 19(6): 1-4. Xu Hengcheng, Zhang Jianguo. The importance analysis of fault tree based-on the binary decision diagrams (BDD) technique[J]. Electro-Mechanical Engineering, 2003, 19(6): 1-4.
[8] Zhang X Y, Sun H R. A BDD based algorithm for reliability analysis of phased mission systems[J]. IEEE Trans on Reliability, 1999, 46 (1): 50-60.
[9] 张文韬,张友鹏,苏宏升, 等. 基于动态故障树的CTCS-3级ATP系统 可靠性分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2014, 21(1): 18-25. Zhang Wentao, Zhang Youpeng, Su Hongsheng, et al. Reliability analysis on ATP system of CTCS-3 based on dynamic fault tree[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2014, 21(1): 18-25.
[10] 王栋. 基于动态故障树分析的民用飞机辅助动力装置系统安全性评 估[J]. 民用飞机设计与研究, 2014(3): 48-52. Wang Dong. Safety assessment of auxiliary power unit (APU) system for civil aircraft based on dynamic fault tree analysis (DFTA) [J]. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2014(3): 48-52.
[11] 朱正付, 李长福, 何恩山, 等. 基于马尔科夫链的动态故障树分析方 法[J]. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(9): 1104-1107. Zhu Zhengfu, Li Changfu, He Enshan, et al. The dynamic fault tree analysis method based on Markov chain[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(9): 1104-1107.
2015, Vol. 33 
