充填站站址是一个充填矿山的咽喉工程,其合理与否是一个新建充填系统的关键。为解决充填站站址方案优化选择问题,本文通过现场调研、资料分析、专家咨询等方式,综合考虑经济、技术、环境、安全等因素,建立了充填站站址方案综合评判指标体系,进而运用层次分析法(AHP)、熵值法(EM)和逼近理想解的排序法(TOPSIS)的基本理论对充填站站址方案进行综合评判,从而确定最优充填站站址方案。评判过程中,为均衡主观、客观因素对各评判指标权重的影响,运用层次分析法确定各评判指标的主观权重,结合熵权法计算得到的客观权重,得到均衡主观、客观因素影响的均衡权重,进而结合逼近理想解的排序法的基本原理建立AHP&EM-TOPSIS综合评判模型,计算得到各充填站站址方案基于评判指标的综合优越度,从而确定各充填站站址方案的优劣。将该方法应用于某矿山实例中,依据该矿山实际条件,拟定3种待选充填站站址方案,建立充填站站址综合评价指标体系,进而运用AHP&EM-TOPSIS综合评判模型对各充填站站址方案进行评判,得出拟选择3种充填站站址方案的综合优越度分别为:71.2%, 46.4%,56.3%,从而确定第1种方案最优。经该矿山实践表明,本文方法所确定的充填站站址方案在生产过程中取得了良好的经济、社会效益。

Filling station location is a throat engineering of the filling mine. Furthermore, whether or not the location of filling station is reasonable is the key to a new built filling system. In order to solve the problem about the optimal selection of filling station scheme, an evaluation indicator system of filling station scheme is established. The economy, technology, environment, and safety factors are comprehensively considered in order to establish the evaluation indicator system. In the establishment process of comprehensive evaluation index, the methods of on-site research, data analysis, and consultation with experts are used to ensure the reliability of the evaluation indicator system. Then, the basic theories of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy Method (EM), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are adopted to evaluate the filling station scheme for determining the optimal filling station location. During the evaluation process, the AHP is used to decide the subjective weights of evaluation indexes, combining with the objective weights that calculated by EM, the balanced weights are gotten. By that way, the impacts of subjective and objective factors on the weights of evaluation indexes are evened up. Then, the AHP&EM-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation model is established with the basic theory of TOPSIS. Finally, by calculating the superior degrees of each filling station site scheme based on the comprehensive evaluation index, the pros and cons of these schemes are determined. The model is used to optimize and select the filling station scheme for a certain mine,the synthetic superior degrees of three optional schemes are obtained, the degrees are 71.2%, 46.4%,56.3%, respectively. Obviously, the first solution is the best. Based on the mine production practice, it is confirmed that the filling station scheme determined by the method has achieved good economic and social benefits.