研究论文

辽河典型支流水生态功能三级区水生态系统健康评价

  • 李法云, 吕纯剑, 魏冉, 王金龙, 褚阔
展开
  • 1. 辽宁石油化工大学生态环境研究院, 抚顺 113001;
    2. 辽宁大学环境学院, 沈阳 110036;
    3. 辽宁省水环境生物检测与水生态安全实验室, 沈阳 110036;
    4. 辽宁省环境科学研究院, 沈阳 110036
李法云,教授,研究方向为流域水污染防治、生态工程与环境修复,电子信箱:lnecology@163.com

收稿日期: 2013-04-27

  修回日期: 2013-11-19

  网络出版日期: 2014-01-22

基金资助

国家科技重大专项(2012ZX07505-001);“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD38B0502);沈阳市科技局计划项目(F10-205-1-64)); 辽宁省“百千万人才工程”项目(2008921082);哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室开放基金项目(HC200902)

Aquatic Ecological Health Assessment of the Third Level Aquatic Eco?functional Zones for Typical Tributaries of Liaohe River

  • LI Fayun, LÜ Chunjian, WEI Ran, WANG Jinlong, CHU Kuo
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Eco?environmental Sciences, Liaoning Shihua University, Fushun 113001, China;
    2. School of Environmental Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China;
    3. Liaoning Key Laboratory of Biological Monitoring of Water Environment and Water Ecology Security, Shenyang 110036, China;
    4. Liaoning Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shenyang 110036, China

Received date: 2013-04-27

  Revised date: 2013-11-19

  Online published: 2014-01-22

摘要

在辽宁省辽河流域水生态功能三级区与河流水生态野外调查基础上,以辽河流域的清河、汎河两条典型一级支流为研究对象,采用主成分分析与相关性分析方法筛选水生态系统健康评价指标,构建了由总磷(TP)、总氮(TN)、化学需氧量(CODCr)、五日生化需氧量(BOD5)、溶解氧(DO)、藻类香农多样性指数(DAA)、底栖动物完整性指数(B-IBI)、鱼类完整性指数(F-IBI)、生境指数、水文指数10个指标构成的水生态系统健康综合评价指标体系,体现了河流水生态系统的物理完整性、化学完整性和生物完整性特征。研究结果表明,清河与汎河流域11个水生态功能三级区中,水生态健康等级1个(Ⅳ-5-4),亚健康等级6个(Ⅳ-5-1、Ⅳ-5-2、Ⅳ-5-3、Ⅳ-5-9、Ⅳ-5-10、Ⅳ-5-11),一般健康等级3个(Ⅳ-5-12、Ⅳ-5-13、Ⅳ-5-14),较差健康等级1个(Ⅳ-5-8)。清河与汎河流域水生态系统总体健康状态从其上游河流源头至下游入辽河干流汇入口呈现逐渐恶化的空间分布特征,且与流域人类活动强度具有密切关系。

本文引用格式

李法云, 吕纯剑, 魏冉, 王金龙, 褚阔 . 辽河典型支流水生态功能三级区水生态系统健康评价[J]. 科技导报, 2014 , 32(1) : 70 -77 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.010

Abstract

Based on the survey of the third level aquatic eco-functional zones of Liao River basin in Liaoning Province and the investigation of its ecosystem, with two typical rivers (Qing River and Fan River) as the selected cases and the water ecosystem health assessment indicators for the principal component analysis (PCA) and the correlation analysis, this paper has constructed the comprehensive assessment indicator groups made of ten parameters: EC, TP, TN, CODCr, BOD5, DAA, DO, DAA, B-IBI, F-IBI, hydrologic index and habitat index, which reveal the integrated physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the rivers in the studied areas. It is shown that among the 11 third level aquatic eco-functional zonings at Qing River and Fan River basins, one zone (Ⅳ-5-4) is evaluated as in the healthy level, six zones (Ⅳ-5-1、Ⅳ-5-2、Ⅳ-5-3、Ⅳ-5-9、Ⅳ-5-10、Ⅳ-5-11) are in sub-healthy level,three zones (Ⅳ-5-12、Ⅳ-5-13、Ⅳ-5-14) are in the ordinary level and one zone (Ⅳ-5-8) is in a poor level. The overall healthy characteristics of the spatial distribution in Qing River and Fan River zonings are gradually deteriorated from the source of the rivers to the end of Liao River, with a close relationship with the human activities.

参考文献

[1] 张楠, 孟伟, 张远, 等. 辽河流域河流生态系统健康的多指标评价方法[J]. 环境科学研究, 2009, 22(2): 163-170. Zhang Nan, Meng Wei, Zhang Yuan, et al. Multi-variable assessment of river ecosystem health in Liao River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Science, 2009, 22(2): 163-170.
[2] James R K. Assessments of biotic integrity using fish communities[J]. Fisheries, 1981, 6(6): 21-27.
[3] Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T. Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RJPACS and other techniques[M]. Oxford, UK Amblesidel: the Freshwater Biological Association, 2000: 1-24.
[4] Hughem R M, Paulsen S G, Stoddard J L. EMAP-surface water: A multi-assemblage probability survey of ecological integrity in the USA[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 17(5): 429-443.
[5] Petersen R C. The RCE 1 a riparian channel, and environmental inventory for small streams in the agriculture landscape[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1992, 27(6): 295-366.
[6] Environment Agency. River habitat survey: 1997 field survey guidance manual incorporating sercon[R]. UK: Center for Ecology and Hydrology, National Environment Research Council, 1997.
[7] Raven P J, Holmes N T H, Naura M, et al. Using river habitat survey for environmental assessment and catchment planning in the UK[J]. Hydrolbiologia, 2000, 17(7): 359-367.
[8] Ladson A R, White L J. An index of stream condition: Reference manual (second edition)[M]. Melboume: Deparment of Natutal Resources and Environment, 1999: 1-65.
[9] 徐祖信. 河流污染治理规划理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版 社, 2003. Xu Zuxin. Planning theory and practice of river pollution control[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2003.
[10] 刘晓燕, 张建中, 张原锋. 黄河健康生命的指标体系[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(5): 451-460. Liu Xiaoyan, Zhang Jianzhong, Zhang Yuanfeng. Indicators of the healthy Yellow River[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(5): 451-460.
[11] 赵彦伟, 杨志峰. 城市河流生态系统健康评价初探[J]. 水科学进展, 2005, 16(3): 349-355. Zhao Yanwei, Yang Zhifeng. Preliminary study on assessment of urban river ecosystem health[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2005, 16 (3): 349-355.
[12] 李法云, 范志平, 张博, 等. 辽河流域水生态功能一级分区指标体系与技术方法[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2012, 28(5): 83-89. Li Fayun, Fan Zhiping, Zhang Bo, et al. An index system and a technical method for the first level aquatic ecoregion in the Liaohe river basin[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2012, 28(5): 83-89.
[13] 刘素萍. 辽河流域三级水生态功能分区研究[D]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2011: 1-81. Liu Suping. The third level aquatic eco-functional zoning of Liao River basin[D]. Shenyang: Liaoning University, 2011: 1-81.
[14] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国环 境科学出版社, 2002. State Environmental Protection Administration. Monitoring and analysis method of water and waste water [M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002.
[15] Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Snyder B D, et al. Rapidbio-assessment protocols for use in streams and wadeablerivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish[M]. 2nd ed. Washington D C: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 1999: 1-10.
[16] 张远, 徐成斌, 马溪平, 等. 辽河流域河流底栖动物完整性评价指标 与标准[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(6): 919-927. Zhang Yuan, Xu Chengbin, Ma Xiping, et al. Biotic integrity index and criteria of benthic organizms in Liao River Basin[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 2007, 27(6): 919-927.
[17] 宋智刚, 王伟, 姜志强, 等. 应用F-IBI对太子河流域水生态健康评价 的初步研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2010, 25(6): 481-487. Song Zhigang, Wang Wei, Jiang Zhiqiang, et al. An assessment of ecosystem health in Taizi River basin using F-IBI[J]. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2010, 25(6): 481-487.
[18] 郑丙辉, 张远, 李英博. 辽河流域河流栖息地评价指标与评价方法研 究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(6): 928-936. Zheng Binghui, Zhang Yuan, Li Yingbo. Study of indicators and methods for river habitat assessment of Liao River Basin[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 2007, 27(6): 928-936.
[19] 李凤青, 唐涛, 蔡庆华, 等. 基于河流环境与生物复合评价指标辽北 地区河流生态健康[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2010, 16(1): 38-45. Li Fengqing, Tang Tao, Cai Qinghua, et al. Research on river health comprehensive assessment: Based on river environment and aquatic organisms[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2010, 16(1): 38-45.
[20] 国家环境保护总局. GB 3838—2002 地表水环境质量标准[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002. State Environmental Protection Administration. GB 3838—2002 Environmental quality standard for surface water[S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002.
[21] 王心芳, 魏复盛. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京:中国环境科 学出版社, 2002. Wang Xinfang, Wei Fusheng. Water and wastewater monitoring analysis method[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002.
[22] 吴天福, 邓华强, 伍人涛. 基于主成分分析的力量结构指标权重计算[J]. 微计算机信息, 2009, 25(16): 264-265. Wu Tianfu, Deng Huaqiang, Wu Rentao. Calculation of the force structure's weight based on PCA[J]. Microcomputer Information, 2009, 25(16): 264-265.
[23] 韩广, 张桂芳. 风成沙丘固定程度的定量分析[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21 (7): 60-61. Han Guang, Zhang Guifang. A quantitative analysis on fixing extent of aeolian sand-dunes[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(7): 60-61.
[24] 孙雪岚, 胡春宏. 关于河流健康内涵与评价方法的综合评述[J]. 泥沙 研究, 2007(5): 74-80. Sun Xuelan, Hu Chunhong. Review on river health connotation and assessment method[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2007(5): 74-80.
文章导航

/