综述文章

植物应答高温和干旱胁迫组学研究进展

  • 吴永波 ,
  • 薛建辉 ,
  • 李百炼
展开
  • 1. 南京林业大学江苏省林业生态工程重点实验室, 南京 210037;
    2. 美国加州大学河滨分校自然与农业科学学院, 美国洛杉矶 92521
吴永波,副教授,研究方向为树木生理生态,电子信箱:yongbowu0920@163.com

收稿日期: 2013-12-17

  修回日期: 2014-03-24

  网络出版日期: 2014-05-19

基金资助

江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2012819);江苏高校生物学优势学科建设工程项目(2010-PAPD)

Progress in Omic of Plant Responses to Elevated Temperature and Drought Stress

  • WU Yongbo ,
  • XUE Jianhui ,
  • LI Bailian
Expand
  • 1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecological Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
    2. College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of California Riverside, Los Angeles 92521, USA

Received date: 2013-12-17

  Revised date: 2014-03-24

  Online published: 2014-05-19

摘要

近20多年来,基于高通量分析的系统生物学研究飞速发展,组学研究不断拓展。组学研究涉及核酸、蛋白、代谢物、表型等各个层次,包括基因组学、转录组学、蛋白组学、代谢组学等一系列组学技术。非生物环境胁迫严重影响植物的生长发育,植物组学的技术方法有助于研究植物对非生物环境胁迫的应答机制。高温和干旱是全球气候变化的两个重要表征,亦是最可能同时出现的两个因子。本文综述基因组学、蛋白组学与代谢组学等组学技术用于分析植物应答高温和干旱胁迫的研究进展,以期为植物应答高温和干旱胁迫研究的未来发展提供参考。

本文引用格式

吴永波 , 薛建辉 , 李百炼 . 植物应答高温和干旱胁迫组学研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2014 , 32(13) : 70 -73 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.13.012

Abstract

For the past two decades the system biology based on high throughput analysis has been developed rapidly, as well as the research fields of omics, which include genomics, transcriptomic and proteomic, metabolic techniques. Plants are subjected to different levels of abiotic stresses throughout the life process, which seriously affect their growth and development. The technology of omic is crucial to the study of mechanism of plants response to abiotic stress. Elevated temperature and drought, the two most simultaneously occurring abiotic factors, are the important characteristics of global climate change. This paper reviews the recent advances in omic analyses in plant response to elevated temperature and drought abiotic stresses, as well as the further research perspective in the field, to provide a reference for the future study of plant responses to elevated temperature and drought stresses.

参考文献

[1] Allen C D , Macalady A K, Chenchouni H, et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259 (4): 660-684.
[2] Godoy O, de Lemos-Filho J P, Valladares F, et al. Invasive species can handle higher leaf temperature under water stress than Miditerranean natives[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2011, 71(2): 207-214.
[3] Schramm F, Ganguli A, Kiehlmann E, et al. The heat stress transcription factor HsfA2 serves as a regulatory amplifier of a subset of genes in the heat stress response in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2006, 60(5): 759-772.
[4] Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance[J]. Journal of Expriemental Botany, 2007, 58(2): 221-227.
[5] Thomashow M F. Molecular basis of plant cold acclimation: insights gained from studying the CBF cold response pathway[J]. Plant Physiology, 2010, 154(2): 571-577.
[6] Dietz K J, Vogel M O, Viehhauser A. AP2/EREBP transcription factors are part of gene regulatory networks and integrate metabolic, hormonal and environmental signals in stress acclimation and retrograde signalling[J]. Protoplasma, 2010, 245(1-4): 3-14.
[7] Tang W, Charles T M, Newton R J. Overexpression of the pepper transcription factor CaPF1 in transgenic Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.) confers multiple stress tolerance and enhances organ growth[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2005, 59(4): 603-617.
[8] Chen L, Song Y, Li S, et al. The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2012, 1819(2): 120-128.
[9] Swindell W R. The association among gene expression responses to nine abiotic stress treatments in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Genetics, 2006, 174(4): 1811-1824.
[10] Huang D, Wu W, Abrams, S R, et al. The relationship of drought-related gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana to hormonal and environmental factors[J]. Journal of Expriemental Botany, 2008, 59(11): 2991-3007.
[11] Umezawa T, Fujita M, Fujita Y, et al. Engineering drought tolerance in plants: Discovering and tailoring genes to unlock the future[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2006, 17(2): 113-122.
[12] Debnath M, Pandey M, Bisen, P S. An omics approach to understand the plant abiotic stress[J]. Omics, 2011, 15(11): 739-762.
[13] Ahsan N, Renaut J, Komatsu S. Recent developments in the application of proteomics to the analysis of plant responses to heavy metals[J]. Proteomics, 2009, 9(10): 2602-2621.
[14] Timperio A M, Egidi M G, Zolla L. Proteomics applied on plant abiotic stresses: Role of heat shock proteins (HSP) [J]. Journal of Proteomics, 2008, 71(4): 391-411.
[15] Gazanchian A, Hajheidari M, Khoshkholgh Sima N, et al. Proteome response of Elymus elongatum to severe water stress and recovery[J]. Journal of Expriemental Botany, 2007, 58(2): 291-300.
[16] Hajheidari M, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Askari H, et al. Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress[J]. Proteomics, 2005, 5(4): 950-960.
[17] Renaut J, Hausman J F, Wisniewski M E. Proteomics and low-temperature studies: Bridging the gap between gene expression and metabolism[J]. Plant Physiology, 2006, 126(1): 97-109.
[18] Larkindale J, Vierling E. Core genome responses involved in acclimation to high temperature[J]. Plant Physiology, 2008, 146(2): 748-761.
[19] Kim J M, To T K, Ishida J, et al. Alterations of lysine modifications on the histone H3 N-tail under drought stress conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2008, 49(10): 1580-1588.
[20] Mlynarova L, Nap J P, Bisselin T. The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling gene AtCHR12 mediates temporary growth arrest in Arabidopsis thaliana upon perceiving environmental stress[J]. Plant Journal, 2007, 51(5): 874-885.
[21] Liu J, Li Y, Gao J, et al. The progress of the proteomic technology[J]. Space Medicine & Medical Engineering, 2009, 22(2): 151-156.
[22] Krenkova J, Foret F. On-line CE/ESI/MS interfacing: Recent developments and applications in proteomics[J]. Proteomics, 2012, 12(19/20): 2978-2990.
[23] Fiehn O. Metabolomics-the link between genotypes and phenotypes[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2002, 48(1/2): 155-171.
[24] Shulaev V, Cortes D, Miller G, et al. Metabolomics for plant stress response[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2008, 132(2): 199-208.
[25] Cramer G R, Ergul A, Grimplet J, et al. Water and salinity stress in grapevines: Early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles[J]. Functional and Integrative Genomics, 2007, 7(2): 111-134.
[26] Urano K, Maruyama K, Ogata Y, et al. Characterization of the ABAregulated global responses to dehydration in Arabidopsis by metabolomics[J]. Plant Journal, 2009, 57(6): 1065-1078.
[27] Krasensky J, Jonak C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks[J]. Journal of Expriemental Botany, 2012, 63(4): 1593-1608.
[28] Hirayama T, Shinozaki K. Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: Past, present and future[J]. Plant Journal, 2010, 61(6): 1041-1052.
[29] Shulaev V. Metabolomics technology and bioinformatics[J]. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2006, 7(2): 128-139.
[30] Sumner L W, Mendes P, Dixon R A. Plant metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era[J]. Phytochemistry, 2003, 62(6): 817-836.
[31] Roessner U, Wagner C, Kopka J, et al. Simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. Plant Journal, 2000, 23(1): 131-142.
[32] Bajad S, Shulaev V. Highly-parallel metabolomics approaches using LC-MS2 for pharmaceutical and environmental analysis[J]. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2007, 26(6): 625-636.
[33] Rizhsky L, Liang H J, Shuman J, et al. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress[J]. Plant Physiology, 2004, 134(4): 1683-1696.
[34] Mittler R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2006, 11(1): 15-19.
[35] Sims K J, Alvarez-Vasquez F, Voit E O, et al. A guide to biochemical systems modeling of sphingolipids for the biochemist[J]. Methods in Enzymology, 2007, 432: 319-350.
[36] Morioka R, Kanaya S, Hirai M, et al. Predicting state transitions in the transcriptome and metabolome using a linear dynamical system model[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007, 8: 343.
[37] Hirai M Y, Klein M, Fujikawa Y, et al. Elucidation of gene-to-gene and metabolite-to-gene networks in Arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2005, 280(27): 25590-25595.
[38] Le Lay P, Isaure M P, Sarry J E. Metabolomic, proteomic and biophysical analyses of Arabidopsis thaliana cells exposed to a caesium stress. Influence of potassium supply[J]. Biochimie, 2006, 88(11): 1533-1547.
[39] Williams Thomas C R, Poolman Mark G, Howden Andrew J M. A genome-scale metabolic model accurately predicts fluxes in central carbon metabolism under stress conditions[J]. Plant Physiology, 2010, 154 (1): 311-323.
[40] Mehrotra B, Mendes P. Bioinformatics approaches to integrate metabolomics and other systems biology data[M]//Saito K, Dixon R A, Willmitzer L. 57 Plant Metabolomics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006: 105-115.
[41] Martins A M, Sha W, Evans C, et al. Comparison of sampling techniques for parallel analysis of transcript and metabolite levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Yeast, 2007, 24(3): 181-188.
[42] Srivastava S, Pathak A D, Gupta P S. Hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzymes impart tolerance to high temperature induced oxidative stress in sugarcane[J]. Journal of Environmental Biology, 2012, 33(3): 657-661.
文章导航

/