低渗透储层逐渐成为海上油田开发技术攻关的重点，它的渗透率受控于孔隙结构。目前低渗透储层渗透率的定量表征主要依据孔隙度建立孔渗关系，因低渗储层孔渗关系差，所以传统方法存在计算精度低的问题。为此提出基于孔喉分布约束的渗透率定量表征方法，在表征过程中考虑孔隙结构影响，依据孔喉半径将孔隙空间划分为不同类型，通过将不同类型孔隙空间赋予不同的权值，表征不同孔喉半径对孔隙空间影响，并将各类孔隙空间加权后之和定义为各类孔喉体积综合系数。与传统方法比较，该系数与渗透率具有更好的相关性。通过在新方法中引入核磁共振测井，可实现渗透率解释结果的连续分布。应用结果表明，新方法解释渗透率具有较高精度，为低渗储层渗透率表征提供了一种切实可行的技术方法。
Low permeability reservoirs are becoming a focus of the offshore oilfield development technologies. The permeability can be controlled by the pore structure, and the quantitative characterization of the permeability can be established based on the relationship between the porosity and the permeability However, this kind of relationship is not very reliable, which reduces the accuracy of the permeability calculation. This paper proposes a new method of the permeability quantitative characterization based on the pore and throat distribution constraints. The pore space is divided into different types based on the size of the pore throat radius, which are given different weights to characterize the effect of the pore throat radius, and the sum of all weighted pore spaces is defined as the pore throat volume coefficient. Compared with the traditional method, the coefficient of the permeability has a better correlation. Through the introduction of the NMR logging in the new method, for a continuous distribution of the permeability interpretation, the application results show that the permeability explained by the new method enjoys a high accuracy, therefore, this method provides a viable technology for the permeability characterization of low permeability reservoirs.
[1] 蒋凌志, 顾家裕, 郭彬程. 中国含油气盆地碎屑岩低渗透储层的特征 及形成机理[J]. 沉积学报, 2004, 22(1): 13-18. Jiang Lingzhi, Gu Jiayu, Guo Bincheng. Characteristics and mechanism of low permeability clastic reservoir in chinese petroliferous basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2004, 22(1)：13-18.
[2] 何更生. 油层物理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1994. He Gengsheng. Petrophysics[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1994.
[3] Wyllie M R J, Gardnen G H F. The generalized Kozeny-Carman equation[J]. AIME, 1958, 32(1): 101-124.
[4] 李道品. 低渗透砂岩油田开发[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1997． Li Daopin. The development of the low permeability sandstone oil field[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1997.
[5] 何雨丹, 毛志强, 肖立志, 等. 核磁共振T2分布评价岩石孔径分布的改 进方法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2005, 48(2): 373-378. He Yudan, Mao Zhiqiang, Xiao Lizhi, et al. An improved method of using NMRT 2 distribution to evaluate pore size distribution[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2005, 48(2): 373-378.
[6] 查传钰, 车文华, 顾伟康. 用核磁测井资料评价岩石孔径分布[J]. 江汉 石油学院学报, 1998, 20(2): 38-42. Zha Chuanyu, Che Wenhua, Gu Weikang. Evaluating pore size distribution with nuclear magnetic log data[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 1998, 20(2): 38-42.
[7] 肖立志. 核磁共振成像测井与岩石核磁共振及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学 出版社, 1998: 56-73. Xiao Lizhi. Magnetic resonance imaging logging and rock's magnetic resonance and its application[M]. Beijing: Science Press,1998: 56-73.
[8] Yakov V, Win L S. A practical approach to obtain primary drainage capillary pressure curves from NMR core and log data[J]. Petrophysics, 2001, 42(4)：334-343.
[9] 运华云, 赵文杰, 刘兵开, 等. 利用T2分布进行岩石孔隙结构研究[J]. 测井技术, 2002, 26(1)：18-25. Yun Huayun, Zhao Wenjie, Li Bingkai, et al. Researching rock pore structure withT 2 distribution[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2002, 26(1): 18-25.
[10] 刘堂宴, 马在田, 傅容珊. 核磁共振谱的岩石孔喉结构分析[J]. 地球 物理学进展, 2003, 18(4)：737-742. Liu Tangyan, Ma Zaitian, Fu Rongshan. Analysis of rock pore structure with NMR spectra[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2003, 18(4): 737-742.
