研究论文

基于压汞系数的储层评价分类方法

  • 杨玲 ,
  • 程道解 ,
  • 刘保磊 ,
  • 白松涛
展开
  • 1. 中国石油集团测井有限公司油气评价中心, 西安 710077;
    2. 长江大学石油工程学院, 武汉 430100
杨玲,工程师,研究方向为油气测井储层评价,电子信箱:yanglinglbl@163.com

收稿日期: 2014-04-08

  修回日期: 2014-06-12

  网络出版日期: 2014-08-27

Reservoir Classification and Application Based on Mercury Injection Coefficient

  • YANG Ling ,
  • CHENG Daojie ,
  • LIU Baolei ,
  • BAI Songtao
Expand
  • 1. Reservoir Evaluation Center, China Petroleum Logging Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710077, China;
    2. School of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China

Received date: 2014-04-08

  Revised date: 2014-06-12

  Online published: 2014-08-27

摘要

针对复杂储层评价这一难题,根据压汞特征参数能够表征储层孔隙结构进而有效反映储层渗透性原理,提出基于压汞资料的储层分类方法。在确定目的层孔隙度下限和优选敏感压汞特征参数并构建能够描述储层有效性的压汞系数的基础上,建立研究区储层的压汞分类标准,最终将区内储层分为四类,其中Ⅰ类储层品质最好,为自然高产区;Ⅳ类储层品质最差,为无效储层区。利用该分类方法对实例井进行处理,并从孔渗、粒度及试油资料等方面进行效果验证,结果均证明这一方法合理、可靠。

本文引用格式

杨玲 , 程道解 , 刘保磊 , 白松涛 . 基于压汞系数的储层评价分类方法[J]. 科技导报, 2014 , 32(24) : 46 -50 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.24.006

Abstract

This paper proposes a reservoir classification method based on mercury injection data, according to the principle that the characteristic parameters in mercury injection method reflect the pore structure and permeability of the reservoir. Firstly, the lower limit of porosity was determined and the sensitive characteristic parameters were selected from the mercury injection data. The relationship map of property and oiliness of the study area shows that the lower limit of porosity of Kong 2 Member is 11%, namely the upper limit of the forth type of reservoir. However, the relationship map between electricity and oiliness shows that the lower limit of porosity of Kong 2 Member is 15%, namely the upper limit of the third type of reservoir. Relationship analysis of the mercury injection parameters and RQI shows the average pore throat radius, replacement pressure and sorting coefficient are the sensitive parameters that reflect effectiveness of the reservoir. The mercury injection coefficient that describes reservoir effectiveness was founded, and the classification standard based on mercury injection data was founded. Finally, the reservoirs are classified into four types. The quality of the first type is the best, and that of the fourth type is the worst. The logging data was processed by this method and the effect was checked by the physical property, particle size and oil test data. The results demonstrate that this method is reasonable and reliable.

参考文献

[1] 张龙海, 周灿灿, 刘国强, 等. 孔隙结构对低孔低渗储集层电性及测井 解释评价的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(6): 671-676. Zhang Longhai, Zhou Cancan, Liu Guoqiang, et al. Influence of pore structures on electric properties and well logging evaluation in low porosity and permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(6): 671-676.
[2] 钟大康, 朱筱敏, 张枝焕, 等. 东营凹陷古近系砂岩储集层物性控制因 素评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30 (3): 95-98. Zhong Dakang, Zhu Xiaomin, Zhang Zhihuan, et al. Origin of secondary porosity of paleogene sandstone in the Dongying Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(3): 95-98.
[3] 马明福, 李薇, 刘亚村. 苏丹Melut盆地北部油田储集层孔隙结构特征 分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(6): 121-124. Ma Mingfu, Li Wei, Liu Yacun. Pore structure characteristics analysis of the oilfield in north Melut Basin, Sudan[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(6): 121-124.
[4] 王允诚. 油层物理学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993. Wang Yuncheng. Reservoir physics[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1993.
[5] 卢明国, 童小兰. 江汉盆地新沟嘴组砂岩孔隙结构与产油潜力[J]. 大 庆石油地质与开发, 2007, 26(4): 31-34. Lu Mingguo, Tong Xiaolan. Characteristics of pore structures and oil production potential of sandstone reservoirof Paleogene Xingouzui formation in Jianghan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007, 26(4): 31-34.
[6] 冉新权, 吴胜和, 付晶, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组低渗透储层 孔隙结构分类研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(2): 77-85. Ran Xinquan, Wu Shenghe, Fu Jing, et al. Research on the pore structure classification of low permeability reservoir or the Yanchang Formation in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(2): 77-85.
[7] 李卫成, 侯加根, 焦巧平, 等. 舍女寺油田女14断块潜力区预测[J]. 断 块油气田, 2005, 12(1): 7-10. Li Weicheng, Hou Jiagen, Jiao Qiaoping, et al. The potential zone prediction of Nv-14 block in Shenvsi oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2005, 12(1): 7-10.
[8] 王贺强, 王仲军, 李志军, 等. 舍女寺油田油气成藏及分布规律研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2006, 13(3): 32-35. Wang Heqiang, Wang Zhongjun, Li Zhijun, et al. Oil and gas reservoir forming and distribution study in Shenusi Oilfield[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2006, 13(3): 32-35.
[9] 王新江, 张丽萍, 石京平. 海拉尔油田孔隙结构特征分析[J]. 大庆石油 地质与开发, 2007, 26(6) :91-94. Wang Xinjiang, Zhang Liping, Shi Jingping. Analysis of pore structure characteristics in Hailaer Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007, 26(6): 91-94.
[10] 张龙海, 刘忠华, 周灿灿, 等. 低孔低渗储集层岩石物理分类方法的 讨论[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(6): 763 -768. Zhang Longhai, Liu Zhonghua, Zhou Cancan, et al. A method for petrophysical classification of low porosity and low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(6): 763 -768.
文章导航

/