专题论文

燃煤电厂电除尘PM10和PM2.5的排放控制III:电除尘电源及小分区改造与PM10和PM2.5的排放(以4×330 MW机组为例)

  • 王仕龙 ,
  • 陈英 ,
  • 韩平 ,
  • 许兵 ,
  • 李增枝 ,
  • 郭占纬 ,
  • 郑钦臻 ,
  • 沈欣军 ,
  • 李树然 ,
  • 闫克平
展开
  • 1. 神华国能集团有限公司, 北京 100033;
    2. 天津大港发电厂, 天津 300272;
    3. 浙江大学生物质化工教育部重点实验室, 杭州 310027
王仕龙, 高级工程师, 研究方向为燃煤电厂复合污染控制和管理, 电子信箱: wangshilong@shenhua.cc

收稿日期: 2014-07-17

  修回日期: 2014-10-27

  网络出版日期: 2014-12-05

基金资助

国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2013AA065000);浙江省重点科技创新团队计划项目(2013TD07)

PM10 and PM2.5 Emission Control by Electrostatic Precipitator(ESP)for Coal-fired Power Plants III: Applications with A 4×330 MW Power Plant

  • WANG Shilong ,
  • CHEN Ying ,
  • HAN Ping ,
  • XU Bing ,
  • LI Zengzhi ,
  • GUO Zhanwei ,
  • ZHENG Qinzhen ,
  • SHEN Xinjun ,
  • LI Shuran ,
  • YAN Keping
Expand
  • 1. Shenhua Guoneng Energy Group Corporation Limited, Beijing 100033, China;
    2. Tianjin Dagang Power Plant, Tianjin 300272, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Received date: 2014-07-17

  Revised date: 2014-10-27

  Online published: 2014-12-05

摘要

讨论了4 台典型电除尘改造和细颗粒物(PM2.5)排放控制,对四电场电除尘器通过本体小分区和电源改造实现了颗粒物(PM10)和细颗粒物(PM2.5)的超低排放控制.仅对五电场电除尘器进行电源改造,即可实现PM10和PM2.5的超低排放,电除尘出口PM10和PM2.5可分别控制在15 和2 mg/m3以下.脱硫塔对PM10有较好的捕集效果,但对PM2.5的去除几乎没有效果.电除尘振打引起的二次飞扬过程及烟气温度也影响PM10和PM2.5的排放,当烟气温度从150~160℃降低到约110℃时,电除尘出口及脱硫塔出口的PM2.5均在2 mg/m3以下.

本文引用格式

王仕龙 , 陈英 , 韩平 , 许兵 , 李增枝 , 郭占纬 , 郑钦臻 , 沈欣军 , 李树然 , 闫克平 . 燃煤电厂电除尘PM10和PM2.5的排放控制III:电除尘电源及小分区改造与PM10和PM2.5的排放(以4×330 MW机组为例)[J]. 科技导报, 2014 , 32(33) : 39 -42 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.33.004

Abstract

This paper discusses how to upgrade electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) with four 330 MW coal-fired generators. For the two four-field ESPs, the upgrading includes replacement of high-voltage electrodes and the high-voltage power sources. For the two five-field ESPs, only the power sources are retrofitted. The ESP outlet PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are less than 15 and 2 mg/m3, respectively. The flue gas desulfurization (FGD) can be effective for PM10 emission reduction, but not for PM2.5. This paper also presents the rapping and gas temperature effects on particle emission. When reducing the gas temperature from 150-160℃ to about 110℃, PM2.5 emission from the ESP or FGD is always less than 2 mg/m3.

参考文献

[1] 王仕龙, 陈英, 韩平, 等. 燃煤电厂电除尘PM10和PM2.5的排放控制Ⅰ:电除尘选型及工业应用[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(33): 23-33.Wang Shilong, Chen Ying, Han Ping, et al. PM10 and PM2.5emissioncontrol by electrostatic precipitator (ESP) for coal-fired power plants I:ESP sizing and applications[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2014, 32(33): 23-33.
[2] 王仕龙. 燃煤电厂电除尘PM10和PM2.5的排放控制Ⅱ: 电除尘电源改造与PM10和PM2.5的排放(以660 MW机组为例)[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(33): 34-38.Wang Shilong. PM10 and PM2.5 emission control by electrostaticprecipitator (ESP) for coal- fired power plants II: Evaluation of ESPupgrading in terms of PM10 and PM2.5 emission reduction with a 660MW generator[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2014, 32(33): 34-38.
[3] 中国环境保护产业协会电除尘委员会. 电除尘器选型设计指导书[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2013.Committee of Electrical Dust Removal, CAEPI. Guide book of ESPdesign[M]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2013.
[4] 马晋辉, 王荣华, 闫克平. 燃煤电厂电除尘器的节能和提效[J]. 电力环境保护, 2008, 24(6): 33-35.Ma Jinhui, Wang Ronghua, Yan Keping. Energy- saving measures ofelectrostatic precipitator in coal- fired power plants[J]. Electric PowerEnvironmental Protection, 2008, 24(6): 33-35.
[5] Zhang B, Wang R, Yan K. Industrial applications of three-phase T/Rfor upgrading ESP perfor mAnce[M]// Yan K. Electrostatic Precipitation.Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co, K, 2008:276-280.
[6] Hall H J. History of pulse energization in electrostatic precipitation[J].Journal of electrostatics, 1990, 25(1): 1-22.
[7] Grass N, Hartmann W, Klockner M. Application of different types ofhigh-voltage supplies on industrial electrostatic precipitators[J]. IndustryApplications, IEEE Transactions on, 2004, 40(6): 1513-1520.
[8] 聂孝峰, 李东阳, 郭斌. 燃煤电厂电袋复合除尘器技术优势[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2013, 29(1): 25-27.Nie Xiaofeng, Li Dongyang, Guo Bin. The advantage of electrostaticand fabric composite filter on coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric PowerEnvironmental Protection, 2013, 29(1): 25-27.
[9] 江得厚, 王贺岑, 张营帅, 等. 燃煤电厂电-袋复合除尘器的应用及问题分析[J]. 中国环保产业, 2012(2): 15-19.Jiang Dehou, Wang Heceng, Zhang Yingshuai, et al. Current situationand problem analysis on electrostatic- bag integrated precipitator incoal- fired power plants[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry,2012(2): 15-19.
[10] Li S, Li X, Huang Y, et al. Fly ash resistivity: Influencing factors,predicting models and its impacts on electrostatic precipitator performAnce[M]//Sarker P K. Fly Ash, Sources, Applications and PotentialEnvironmental Impacts. New Yorks: NOVA Science Publishers, 2014:91-144.
[11] 朱继保, 章旭明, 胡行伟, 等. 电除尘器电极结构与灰堆积特性相关性研究[J]. 科技导报, 2008, 26(9): 30-33.Zhu Jibao, Zhang Xuming, Hu Hangwei, et al. Characteristics ofcollected dust layer in a laboratory electrostatic precipitator[J]. Science& Technology Review, 2008, 26(9): 30-33.
[12] Oglesby S. Electrostatic precipitation[M]. New York: Marcel DekkerInc Press, 1978.
[13] 曾宇翾, 沈欣军, 章旭明, 等. 电除尘器中离子风的实验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2013, 47(12): 2208-2211.Zeng Yuxuan, Shen Xinjun, Zhang Xuming, et al. Experimental studyof ionic wind in an electrostatic precipitator[J]. Journal of ZhejiangUniversity: Engineering Science, 2013, 47(12): 2208-2211.
[14] 沈欣军, 王仕龙, 韩平, 等. 电除尘器内亚微米细颗粒物动态的可视化测试[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版. (待发表)Shen Xinjun, Wang Shilong, Han Ping, et al. Visualizationmeasurements of submicron particles motion in electrostatic precipitator[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science. (in press)
文章导航

/