研究论文

大孔道内流体流动规律的物理模拟实验

  • 顾文欢 ,
  • 刘月田 ,
  • 杨宝泉 ,
  • 尚凡杰 ,
  • 苑志旺
展开
  • 1. 中海油研究总院, 北京100027;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程教育部重点实验室, 北京102249
顾文欢, 工程师, 研究方向为油气田开发理论, 电子信箱: guwenhuan20@163.com

收稿日期: 2014-07-02

  修回日期: 2014-09-17

  网络出版日期: 2015-01-09

基金资助

国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05030-005)

Fluid Flow Mechanism in Large Pore Paths Investigated Using Physical Simulation

  • GU Wenhuan ,
  • LIU Yuetian ,
  • YANG Baoquan ,
  • SHANG Fanjie ,
  • YUAN Zhiwang
Expand
  • 1. CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100027, China;
    2. MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received date: 2014-07-02

  Revised date: 2014-09-17

  Online published: 2015-01-09

摘要

油藏大孔道内部形态结构既不同于多孔介质也不同于常见管道, 因此, 大孔道内流体流动规律也应不同于常规渗流及粗糙管流, 为方便表述, 本文定义流体通过大孔道的流动为“洞流”。为深入研究大孔道洞流规律, 以因次分析法为基础, 建立大孔道洞流规律物理模型的相似准数, 通过采用不同比例目数的砂粒, 制备了9 个大孔道洞流规律物理模型, 研究不同壁面突出度条件下大孔道的压降及流量关系。研究结果表明:随着流量的增加, 9 个不同突出度大孔道洞流物理模型的流体流动阻力压力梯度均随流量的增加而逐渐增大, 且突出度越大, 压力梯度的增幅越大;当流速增加到一定程度时, 大孔道洞流规律由线性流转变为非线性流;在相同横截面积及相同流动截面积条件下, 洞流的压降梯度小于渗流, 但大于粗糙管流。

本文引用格式

顾文欢 , 刘月田 , 杨宝泉 , 尚凡杰 , 苑志旺 . 大孔道内流体流动规律的物理模拟实验[J]. 科技导报, 2014 , 32(36) : 75 -79 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.36.012

Abstract

The inner morphological structure of large pore paths is different from neither porous media nor pipes, thus the fluid flow mechanism in them is different from seepage flow and pipe flow. This paper aims to study the law governing fluid flow in large pore paths in unconsolidated sandstone reservoir. The similar number of the physical models of large pore path fluid flow was established based on dimensional analysis. Nine physical models were established with different mesh numbers of sand grains to investigate the relationship between differential pressure and flow rate in large pore paths under different extruding conditions of walls. The results show that the pressure gradient of flow resistance in the nine psychical models increased with the increasing of flow rate, and the higher the extruding degree of the wall, the larger the amplification of the pressure gradient. When the flow rate was increased to a certain value, the fluid flow changed from linear to nonlinear. Fluid flow in large pore paths, porous media and pipes was compared under the same cross-sectional area and same flow cross-sectional area, and the pressure gradient in large pore paths was lower than that of seepage flow but higher than that of pipe flow.

参考文献

[1] 崔庆东. 砂岩油藏大孔道的识别方法[J]. 油气井测试, 2009, 18(3): 29-31. Cui Qingdong. Identification method of big channel in sandstone reservoir[J]. Well Testing, 2009, 18(3): 29-31.
[2] 胡书勇, 张烈辉, 罗建新, 等. 砂岩油藏大孔道的研究——回顾与展望[J]. 特种油气藏, 2006, 13(6): 10-14. Hu Shuyong, Zhang Liehui, Luo Jianxin, et al. Study on large pore path in sandstone reservoirs-review and prospect [J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2006, 13(6): 10-14.
[3] 李科星, 蒲万芬, 赵军, 等. 疏松砂岩油藏大孔道识别综述[J]. 西南石 油大学学报, 2007, 29(5): 42-44. Li Kexing, Pu Wanfen, Zhao Jun, et al. Summarization of Identification of Macro-Pores in Unconsolidated Sandstone Oil Reservoir [J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, 2007, 29(5): 42-44.
[4] 窦之林, 曾流芳, 张志海, 等. 大孔道诊断和描述技术研究[J]. 石油勘 探与开发, 2001, 28(1): 75-77. Dou Zhilin, Zeng Liufang, Zhang Zhihai, et al. Research on the diagnosis and description of wormhole [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2001, 28(1): 75-77.
[5] 曾流芳, 赵国景, 张子海, 等. 疏松砂岩油藏大孔道形成机理及判别方 法[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2002, 10(3): 268-275. Zeng Liufang, Zhao Guojing, Zhang Zhihai, et al. The macroscopic throats forming mechanism of unsolidated sand-reservior and their identyfying method[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2002, 10(3): 268-275.
[6] Wang X Z, Wang J Y, Wang C F, et al. Quantitative description of characteristics of high-capacity channels in unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs using in situ production data[J]. Petroleum Science, 2010, 7 (1): 106-111.
[7] Hu S Y, Zhang L H, Yao H S, et al. A simulation method for big channel formation in unconsolidated sandstone reservoir during waterflooding[ C]. Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, June 13-15, 2006.
[8] 刘月田, 孙保利, 于永生. 大孔道模糊识别与定量计算方法[J]. 石油钻 采工艺, 2003, 25(5): 54-59. Liu Yuetian, Sun Baoli, Yu Yongsheng. Fuzzy identification and quantative calculation method for big pore throat [J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2003, 25(5): 54-59.
[9] 李传亮, 张学磊. 管流与渗流的统一[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2007, 28(2): 252-253. Li Chuanliang, Zhang Xuelei. Unification of flow equations in tubes and in porous media[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28(2): 252-253.
[10] 崔传智, 杨勇, 曹刚, 等. 疏松砂岩油藏大孔道中高速非达西渗流对 产能的影响分析[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2009, 31(3): 122-129. Cui Chuanzhi, Yang Yong, Cao Gang, et al. Effect of high velocity non-darcy flow on productivity in wormhole of unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2009, 31(3): 122-129.
[11] 杜东兴. 可压缩性及粗糙度对微细管内流动及换热特性的影响[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2000. Du Dongxing. Effect of compressibility and roughness on flow and heat transfer characteristics in mircrotubes[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2000.
[12] Kandlikar S G. Roughness effects at microscale-reassessing Nikukadse's experiments on liquid flow in rough tubes[J]. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences, 2005, 53(4): 343-348.
[13] 邹江, 彭晓峰, 颜维谋. 壁面粗糙度对通道流动特性的影响[J]. 化工 学报, 2008, 59(1): 25-31. Zou Jiang, Peng Xiaofeng, Yan Weimou. Effects of roughness on fluid flow behavior in ducts[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2008, 59(1): 25-31.
文章导航

/