研究论文

有效应力对不同阶煤渗透率影响的差异性分析

  • 薛培 ,
  • 郑佩玉 ,
  • 徐文君 ,
  • 任小龙 ,
  • 黄晨 ,
  • 杜江民
展开
  • 1. 中国矿业大学(北京)地球科学与测绘工程学院, 北京100083;
    2. 中石油青海分油田采油二厂, 海西816400;
    3. 西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室, 西安710069;
    4. 石家庄经济学院资源学院, 石家庄050031
薛培,博士研究生,研究方向为煤层气及油气地质,电子信箱:xuepei330@163.com

收稿日期: 2014-10-17

  修回日期: 2014-12-16

  网络出版日期: 2015-02-09

基金资助

国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05042-003)

Influence of effective stress on permeability of different rank coals

  • XUE Pei ,
  • ZHENG Peiyu ,
  • XU Wenjun ,
  • REN Xiaolong ,
  • HUANG Chen ,
  • DU Jiangmin
Expand
  • 1. College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. No.2 Oil Producing Plant, Qinghai Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Haixi 816400, China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China;
    4. College of Resources, Shijiazhuang University of Economics, Shijiazhuang 050031, China

Received date: 2014-10-17

  Revised date: 2014-12-16

  Online published: 2015-02-09

摘要

通过不同阶煤储层渗透率应力敏感性实验,对比分析了有效应力对不同阶煤渗透率影响的差异。结果显示,在相同有效应力变化范围内,低阶煤渗透率下降幅度大于中、高阶煤;低、高阶煤渗透率变化较中阶煤更符合指数函数变化规律;低有效应力阶段,低阶煤渗透率损害系数、应力敏感系数大于中、高阶煤;相同有效应力下,低阶煤割理压缩系数大于中、高阶煤;不同煤阶割理压缩系数随有效应力增加呈现下降趋势,不应将其视为常数。应力敏感性评价参数拟合结果显示,中、低阶煤渗透率损害系数、割理压缩系数符合指数函数变化规律,高阶煤渗透损害系数、割理压缩系数符合线性函数变化规律;不同阶煤渗透率应力敏感系数均符合指数变化规律。

本文引用格式

薛培 , 郑佩玉 , 徐文君 , 任小龙 , 黄晨 , 杜江民 . 有效应力对不同阶煤渗透率影响的差异性分析[J]. 科技导报, 2015 , 33(2) : 69 -73 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.02.010

Abstract

Based on the stress sensitivity experiments of various rank coals, the influence of the effective stress on the permeability of different rank coals is studied. It is shown that in the same range of the effective stress variation, the decrease of the low-rank coal permeability is larger than that of the medium-rank and high-rank coals; The permeability variations of the low-rank and high-rank coals more consistently follow an exponential law than the medium-rank coal; In the low effective stress range, the damage coefficient of the permeability and the stress sensitive coefficient of the low-rank coal are greater than those of the medium-rank and high-rank coals; Under the identical effective stress, the cleat compressibility of the low-rank coal is greater than that of the medium-rank and high-rank coals; The cleat compressibility decreases with the increase of the effective stress, and it is not constant. Fitting results of evaluation parameters of the stress sensitivity show that the damage coefficient of the permeability and the cleat comperssibility of the low-rank and medium-rank coals follow an exponential law, but for the high-rank coal, they follow a linear function; the stress sensitive coefficient of various rank coals follows an exponential law.

参考文献

[1] 秦勇, 叶建平, 林大扬, 等. 煤储层厚度与其渗透性及含气性关系初步 探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2000, 28(1): 24-27. Qin Yong, Ye Jianping, Lin Dayang, et al. Relationship of coal reservior thickness and its permeability and gas bearing property[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2000, 28(1): 24-27.
[2] 李培超, 孔祥言, 曾清红, 等. 煤层渗透率影响因素综述与分析[J]. 天 然气工业, 2002, 22(5): 45-49. Li Peichao, Kong Xiangyan, Zeng Qinghong, et al. Summarizing and analyzing the factors affecting the coefficient of permeability of coal beds[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(5): 45-49.
[3] 薄冬梅, 赵永军, 姜林. 煤储层渗透性研究方法及主要影响因素[J]. 油 气地质与采收率, 2008, 15(1): 18-21. Bo Dongmei, Zhao Yongjun, Jiang Lin. Reserch method and main influencing factors of coal reservir permeability[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(1): 18-21.
[4] 蔡东梅, 孙立东, 赵永军. 基于煤演化程度的煤储层渗透率发育机理 初探[J]. 山东科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 28(2): 22-27. Cai Dongmei, Sun Lidong, Zhao Yongjun. Research on development mechanism of coal seam permeability based on coal evolution degree[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology: Natural Science, 2009, 28(2): 22-27.
[5] 陈振宏, 王一兵, 郭凯, 等. 高煤阶煤层气藏储层应力敏感性研究[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(10): 1390-1395. Chen Zhenhong, Wang Yibing, Guo Kai, et al. Stress sensitivity of highrank coalbed methane reservoir[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(10): 1390-1395.
[6] 孟召平, 侯泉林. 高煤级煤储层渗透性与应力耦合模型及控制机理[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(2): 667-675. Meng Zhaoping, Hou Quanlin. Coupling model of stressdependentpermeability in high- rank coal reservoir and its control mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(2): 667-675.
[7] 孟召平, 侯泉林. 煤储层应力敏感性及影响因素的试验分析[J]. 煤炭 学报, 2012, 37(3): 430-437. Meng Zhaoping, Hou Quanlin. Experimental research on stress sensitivity of coal reservoir and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(3): 430-437.
[8] 黄远智, 王恩志. 低渗透岩石渗透率对有效应力敏感系数的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(2): 410-414. Huang Yuanzhi, Wang Enzhi. Experimental study on coefficient of sensitiveness between percolation rate and effective pressure for low permeability rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(2): 410-414.
[9] Shi J Q, Durucan S. Drawdown induced changes in permeability of coalbeds: A new interpretation of the reservoir response to primary recovery[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2004(56): 1-16.
[10] Shi J Q, Durucan S. A model for changes in coalbedpermeability during primary and enhanced methane recovery[J]. Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2005(4): 291-299.
[11] Cui X J, Bustin R M. Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coalseams[J]. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2005 (9): 1181-1202.
[12] Cui X J, Bustin R M, Chikatamarla L. Adsorption- induced coal swelling and stress: Implications for methane production and acid gas sequestration into coal seams[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007, 112(B10): 202.
文章导航

/