大学拥有丰富的科学技术知识资源、研究资源、设施资源和人力资源,在科普方面拥有独具特色的科普优势,可以在科普领域发挥重要作用、扮演关键角色。科普事业的繁荣发展离不开大学这支生力军。但就整体而言,中国大学科普的发展状况还很不理想,存在许多亟待解决的问题。本文认为推进大学科普需要系统的思考和模式设计,并从政府部门、大学、大学科普评价3个层面,对如何推进中国大学科普发展的问题进行了初步探讨,提出了大学科普推进模式选择的宏观思路。
A university enjoys abundant S&T knowledge resources, facilities and human resources so as to have advantages in science popularization. Generally speaking, its development so far is unsatisfactory with many problems demanding a prompt solution. During past few years, the science popularization policy of China stipulates the university science popularization and scholars put forward several suggestions. This paper points out that the systematic consideration and the model design should be used to promote the university science popularization. From the perspective of a 3 level evaluation, including the government, the university and the university science popularization, this paper discusses how to promote the university science popularization and put forward a macroscopical solution.
[1] 翟杰全, 任福君. 大学科普的动力、优势、途径和价值——对大学科普 相关问题的一个经验分析[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(32): 78-84. Zhai Jiequan, Ren Fujun. The motivation, superiority, approach and significance of university science popularization:The empirical analysis of related issues in university science popularization[J]. Science and Technology Review, 2014, 32(32): 78-84.
[2] 张增一, 李亚宁. 把科技传播给公众:MIT 案例分析[J]. 科普研究, 2009(3): 5-11. Zhang Zengyi, Li Yaning. Communicating science & technology to the public: A case study of MIT[J]. Science Popularization, 2009(3): 5-11.
[3] Ulrike Felt. Optimising public understanding of science and technology [R/OL].
[2014-08-01]. http://www.univie.ac.at/virusss/opus/OPUS% 20 Report%20Final.pdf.
[4] 让-皮埃尔·卡纳. 大学的新任务[J]. 外国教育资料, 1985(3): 48-50. Jean-Pierre Connor. The new task for university[J]. Foreign Education, 1985(3): 48-50.
[5] 翟杰全, 任福君. 大学科普的现状、问题及原因——对大学科普问题 的微观政治学分析[J]. 科技导报, 2015, 33(2): 113-119. Zhai Jiequan, Ren Fujun. Current situation, problems and reasons of university science popularization:The micro-political analysis of issues in university science popularization[J]. Science and Technology Review, 2015, 33(2): 113-119.
[6] 舒志彪, 詹正茂. 大学向社会开放开展科普活动现状分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2009(10): 221-223. Shu Zhibiao, Zhan Zhengmao. The studies of current situation of university open to society in science popularization[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2009(3): 221-223.
[7] 赵大中. 对加强高校科普工作的思考[J]. 南京工程学院学报: 社会科 学版, 2006(3): 45-48. Zhao Dazhong. The consideration of strengthen university science popularization[J]. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Technology: Social Science Edition, 2006(3): 45-48.
[8] 李云庆, 王慧兰. 新时期高校介入科普工作的意义和有效途径[J]. 天 津科技, 2008(6): 69-70. Li Yunqing, Wang Huilan. The significance and effective way of university participating in science popularization[J]. Tianjing Science and Technology, 2008(6): 69-70.
[9] 袁勇. 高校教师科普激励机制的建立与完善[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2006. Yuan Yong. Establishing and perfecting of science and technology popularization motivation system for college teachers[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2006.
[10] 党伟龙,刘萱. 英美科学传播奖项述评[J]. 科普研究, 2012(4): 67-76. Dang Weilong, Liu Xuan. The review of science communication awards in Britain and America[J]. Science Popularization, 2012(4): 67-76.
[11] 任福君, 张志敏, 翟立原. 科普活动概论[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出 版社, 2013: 14-26. Ren Fujun, Zhang Zhiming, Zhai Liyuan. Introduction of science popularization activity[M]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 2013: 14-26.
[12] 游晓欢, 陈兴明. 国内外大学教师绩效评价现状研究述评[J]. 当代教 育论坛, 2010(10): 49-51. You Xiaohuan, Chen Xingming. The review of current situation in world wide university teachers'performance evaluation[J]. Forum on Contemporary Education, 2010(10): 49-51.
[13] 夏妍, 张怀菊. 美国大学教师绩效评价研究[J]. 世界教育信息, 2006 (9): 51-53. Xia Yan, Zhang Huaiju. The study of American university teachers' performance evaluation[J]. World Education Information, 2006(9): 51-53.
[14] 郭文臣, 杨宁, 何婷婷. 研究型大学教授考评指标体系研究[J]. 管理 学报, 2011(3): 423-428. Guo Wenchen, Yang Ning, He Tingting. Performance evaluation index system of professors based on different sorts in research-oriented universities[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2011(3): 423-428.
