通过对烟粉虱Bemisia tabaci Gennadius 的两种优势寄生蜂浅黄恩蚜小蜂Encarsia sophia Girault & Dodd 和海氏桨角蚜小蜂Eretmocerus hayati Zolnerowich & Rose 的生殖系统结构与卵巢发育特点的研究,明确了影响两种寄生蜂不同寄主处理行为的生理机制。两种寄生蜂雌性生殖系统各包括1 对卵巢、1 对侧输卵管、中输卵管、受精囊、产卵管和产卵鞘。浅黄恩蚜小蜂的产卵器细长笔直较锋利,海氏桨角蚜小蜂产卵器扁平且尖端向上弯曲,这与两种寄生蜂不同的产卵机制相吻合。浅黄恩蚜小蜂和海氏桨角蚜小蜂雌蜂初羽化时体内成熟卵子数量存在明显差异,但随着时间的推移和营养的补充,两种寄生蜂卵巢内成熟卵子的数量都会显著增加。两种寄生蜂均为卵育型寄生蜂。
The female reproductive system structures and ovary developmental traits of two parasitoids, Encarsia sophia (Girault & Dodd) and Eretmocerus hayati (Zolnerowich & Rose), of whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) were studied to explain the differences of host handling strategies between these two parasitoid species. The female reproductive system of both En. sophia and Er. hayati each consisted of a pair of ovaries and lateral oviducts, common oviduct, spermatheca, ovipositor and ovipositor sheath. The ovipositor of En. sophia is straight and has an apparently hard and sharply pointed upper valve, while that of Er. hayati is curved, thick-walled, but has a blunt and apparently flexible tip. These features correlated well with the oviposition mechanisms of En. sophia and Er. hayati. Significant difference was found in the number of mature ova between En. sophia and Er. hayati when they emerged. The number of mature ova of both parasitoids increased with the age of adult female when the available nutrition was enough. Both En. sophia and Er. hayati are synovigenic.
[1] 罗晨, 张君明, 石宝才, 等. 北京地区烟粉虱Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) 调查初报[J]. 北京农业科学, 2000, 18(增1): 42-47. Luo Chen, Zhang Junming, Shi Baocai, et al. Preliminary investigation of host- plant of Bemisia tababi (Gennadius) in Beijing[J]. Beijing Agricultural Sciences, 2000, 18(Suppl 1): 42-47.
[2] 万方浩, 郑小波, 郭建英. 重要农林外来入侵物种的生物学与控制[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005: 44-55. Wan Fanghao, Zheng Xiaobo, Guo Jianying. Biology and management of invasive alien species in agriculture and forestry[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005: 44-55.
[3] Hoelmer K A, Roltsch W J. Evaluation of exotic parasitoids and predators in field cages in California: Classical biological control of Bemisia tabaci in the United States: A review of interagency research and implementation[M]. Gould J, Hoelmer K, Goolsby J. The Netherlands: Springer, 2008: 129-145.
[4] 王继红, 张帆, 李元喜. 烟粉虱寄生蜂种类及繁殖方式多样性[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2011, 27(1): 115-123. Wang Jihong, Zhang Fan, Li Yuanxi. Diversity of species and reproductive mode of Bemisia tabaci parasitoids[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2011, 27(1): 115-123.
[5] Yang N W, Ji L L, Lovei G L, et al. Shifting preference between oviposition vs. host- feeding under changing host densities in two aphelinid parasitoids[J]. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7: e41189.
[6] Xu H Y, Yang N W, Wan F H. Competitive interactions between parasitoids provide new insight into host suppression[J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(11): e82003.
[7] 冀禄禄, 杨念婉, 万方浩, 等. 海氏桨角蚜小蜂和浅黄恩蚜小蜂雌性生殖系统的解剖结构[J]. 中国生物防治, 2012, 28(3): 303-307. Ji Lulu, Yang Nianwan, Wan Fanghao, et al. Female reproductive system of Eretmocerus hayati (Zolnerowich & Rose) and Encarsia sophia (Girault & Dodd), parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2012, 28(3): 303-307.
[8] 方美娟. 三种烟粉虱寄生蜂感觉系统及其寄生发育习性的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2012. Fang Meijuan. Studies on sense organ and parasitic development characters of three parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci Gennadius[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2012.
[9] 王青, 严毓骅. 丽蚜小蜂雌雄生殖系统的形态研究[J]. 北京农业大学学报, 1992, 18(2): 207-209. Wang Qing, Yan Yuhua. Study on the female reproductive system of Encarsia formosa Gahan[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1992, 18(2): 207-209.
[10] Jervis M A, Heimpel G E, Ferns P N, et al. Life-history strategies in parasitoid wasps: A comparative analysis of‘ovigeny’[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2001, 70: 442-458.
[11] Jervis M A, Ellers J, Harvey J A. Resource acquisition, allocation, and utilization in parasitoid reproductive strategies[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2008, 53: 361-385.
[12] Jervis M A, Copland M J W. The life cycle. Insect natural enemies: Practical approaches to their study and evaluation[M]. Jervis M, Kidd N. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996: 63-161.
[13] Heimpel G E, Rosenheim J A. Egg limitation in insect parasitoids: A review of the evidence and a case study[J]. Biological Control, 1998, 11: 160-168.
[14] Goldson S L, McNeill M R, Proffitt J R, et al. An investigation into the reproductive characteristics of Microtonus hyperodae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Listronotus bonariensis (Kuschel) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)[J]. Entomophaga, 1995, 40(34): 413-426.
[15] Potting R P J, Overholt W A, Osae-Danso F O, et al. Foraging behavior and life history of the stemborer parasitoid Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)[J]. Journal of Insect Behavior, 1997, 10: 13- 29.
[16] Pak G A, Oatman E R. Biology of Trichogramma brevicapillum[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1982, 32: 61-67.
[17] Waage J K, Ming N S. The reproductive strategy of a parasitic wasp. IV. Optimal progeny and sex allocation in Trichogramma evanescens[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1984, 53: 401-415.
[18] Bai B, Luck R F, Forster L, et al. The effect of host size on quality attributes of the egg parasitoid, Trichogramma pretiosum[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1992, 64: 37-48.
[19] Hohmann C L, Luck R F, Oatman E R. A comparison of longevity and fecundity of adult Trichogramma platneri (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) reared from eggs of the Cabbage looper and the Angoumois grain moth, with and without access to honey[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1988, 81: 1307-1312.
[20] Bourchier R S, Smith S M, Song S J. Host acceptance and parasitoid size as predictors of parasitoid quality for mass-reared Trichogramma minutum[J]. Biological Control, 1993, 3: 135-139.
[21] Pavlik J. The size of the female and quality assessment of mass-reared Trichogramma spp.[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1993, 66: 171-177.
[22] Gerling D, Quicke D L G, Orion T. Oviposition mechanisms in the whitefly parasitoids Encarsia transvena and Eretmocerus mundus[J]. Biological Control, 1998, 43: 289-297.
[23] van Lenteren J C, Nell H W, Sevenster-van der Lelie L A, et al. The parasite- host relationship between Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). III. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized hosts by the parasite[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2009, 81: 377-380.
