专题论文

相关推论与强相关逻辑

  • 程京德
展开
  • 日本国立埼玉大学, 日本埼玉 338-8570
程京德,教授,研究方向为软件工程,知识工程,信息安全性工程,相关逻辑等,电子信箱:cheng@ics.saitama-u.ac.jp

收稿日期: 2016-03-25

  网络出版日期: 2016-04-28

摘要

推论的能力,尤其是抽象推论的能力,无疑是人类智能最本质的特征之一,因而应该是任何以实现人工人类智能为目标的计算智能系统都应该提供的必不可少的功能。本文简要介绍相关推论和相关逻辑。分析表明,为相关推论提供逻辑有效性保证的强相关逻辑,对于以发现或预测为最基本功能的各种计算智能系统来说,具有无可替代的关键作用。

本文引用格式

程京德 . 相关推论与强相关逻辑[J]. 科技导报, 2016 , 34(7) : 39 -47 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2016.07.005

参考文献

[1] Anderson A R, Belnap Jr N D. Entailment. The logic of relevance and necessity (Vol. I)[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1975.
[2] Anderson A R, Belnap Jr N D, Dunn J M, Entailment. The logic of relevance and necessity (Vol. II)[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1992.
[3] Diaz M R. Topics in the logic of relevance[M]. Munchen:Philosophia Verlag, 1981.
[4] Dunn J M, Restall G. Relevance Logic[M]//Gabbay D, Guenthner F, ed. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd Ed, Vol 6. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic, 2002.
[5] Mares E D. Relevant logic:A philosophical interpretation[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[6] Read S. Relevant logic:A philosophical examination of inference[M]. Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1988.
[7] Cheng J D. Rc-A relevant logic for conditional relation representation and reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 1st Singapore International Conference on Intelligent Systems. Singapore, 1992:171-176.
[8] Cheng J D. A relevant logic approach to automated theorem finding[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Automated Theorem Proving attached to International Symposium on Fifth Generation Computer Systems 1994. Tokyo, Japan, 1994.
[9] Cheng J D. Entailment calculus as the logical basis of automated theorem finding in scientific discovery[R]//Valdes-Perez R ed. Systematic Methods of Scientific Discovery:Papers from the 1995 Spring Symposium. AAAI Press, 1995:AAAI Technical Report SS-95-03.
[10] Cheng J D. EnCal:An automated forward deduction system for general-purpose entailment calculus[C]//Terashima N, Altman E, ed. Advanced IT Tools, Proceedings IFIP World Conference on IT Tools, IFIP 9614th World Computer Congress. Chapman & Hall, 1996:507-514.
[11] Cheng J D. Epistemic programming:Toward a new programming paradigm for scientific discovery[C]//Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Annual International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,Vol. 3. IEEE, 1996:2400-2406.
[12] Cheng J D. A strong relevant logic model of epistemic processes in scientific discovery[C]//Kawaguchi E, Kangassalo H, Jaakkola H, et al. Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases XI, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol 61. IOS Press, F2000:136-159.
[13] Cheng J D. Strong relevant logic as the universal basis of various applied logics for knowledge representation and reasoning[C]//Kiyoki Y, Henno J, Jaakkola H, et al. Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XVII, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol 136. IOS Press, 2006:310-320.
[14] Gao Y, Cheng J D. Operational semantics for positive relevant logics without distribution[C]//Computation and Logic in the Real World, Third Conference on Computability in Europe, CiE 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 4497. Springer, 2007:325-335.
[15] Gao Y, Cheng J D. Semantics for a basic relevant logic with intensional conjunction and disjunction (and some of its extensions)[J]. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 2008, 18(1):145-164.
[16] Cheng J D. Automated knowledge appreciation:A relevant reasoning approach to expand our knowledge and increase its value automatically[C]//Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2015:175-183.
[17] Cheng J D, Nara S, Goto Y. FreeEnCal:A forward reasoning engine with general-purpose[C]//Apolloni B, Howlett R J, Jain L C, ed. Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 11th International Conference, KES 2007, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol 4693. Springer-Verlag, 2007:444-452.
[18] Wos L. Automated reasoning:33 basic research problems[J]. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA:Prentice Hall, 1988.
[19] Wos L. The problem of automated theorem finding[J]. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1993, 10(1):137-138.
[20] Gao H, Goto Y, Cheng J D. A systematic methodology for automated theorem finding[J]. Theoretical Computer Science, 2014, 554:2-21.
[21] Takahashi I, Nara S, Goto Y, et al. EPLAS:An epistemic programming language for all scientists[J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2007, 2:608-616.
[22] Cheng J D. Autonomous and continuous evolution of information systems[J]. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2005, 3681:758-767.
[23] Cheng J D. Evolutionary personal information partners[C]//Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008.
[24] Rosen R. Anticipatory systems:philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations[M]. 2nd ed. Springer, 2012.
[25] Dubois D M. Computing anticipatory systems with incursion and hyperincursion[C]//Computing Anticipatory Systems:CASYS-First International Conference, AIP Conference Proceedings. The American Institute of Physics, 1998.
[26] Cheng J D. Temporal relevant logic as the logical basis of anticipatory reasoning-reacting systems" (invited paper)[C]//Computing Anticipatory Systems:CASYS 2003 Sixth International Conference, AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, 2004.
[27] Kitajima N, Goto Y, Cheng J D. Development of a decision-maker in an anticipatory reasoning-reacting system for terminal radar control[C]//Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems, 4th International Conference, HAIS09. Springer, 2009.
[28] Shang F, Cheng J D. Anticipatory agents based on anticipatory reasoning[C]//Foundations of Intelligent Systems, 15th International Symposium, ISMIS 2005. Springer, 2005.
[29] Shi K, Goto Y, Zhu Z, et al. Anticipatory emergency elevator evacuation systems[C]//Intelligent Information and Database Systems, 5th Asian Conference, ACIIDS 2013. Springer, 2013.
[30] Shi K, Goto Y, Zhu Z, et al. Anticipatory runway incursion prevention systems[J]. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 2013, 96. D(11):2385-2396.
[31] Cheng J D. Deontic relevant logic as the logical basis for legal information systems[C]//Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. Dijon, France:ACM Press, 2006.
[32] Cheng J D. Deontic relevant logic as the logical basis for representing and reasoning about legal knowledge in legal information systems[C]//Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 12th International Conference, KES 2008. Springer, 2008.
[33] Cheng J D, Miura J. Deontic relevant logic as the logical basis for specifying, verifying, and reasoning about information security and information assurance[C]//Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2006.
[34] Wagatsuma K, Goto Y, Cheng J D. A formal analysis method with reasoning for key exchange protocols[J]. IPSJ Journal, 2015, 56(3):903-910.
[35] Wagatsuma K, Harada T, Anze S, et al. A supporting tool for spiral model of cryptographic protocol design with reasoning-based formal analysis[M]//Advanced Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering-Future Information Technology 2, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol 354. Springer, 2015.
[36] Cheng J D. Computing intentions dynamically in a changing world by anticipatory relevant reasoning[C]//Intelligent Information and Database Systems, 6th Asian Conference, ACIIDS 2014. Springer, 2014.
文章导航

/