专题论文

意识障碍患者的床旁脑电测试与功能恢复预后研究

  • 徐珑 ,
  • 王波 ,
  • 王泳 ,
  • 赵继宗
展开
  • 1. 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科, 北京 100050;
    2. 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心, 北京 100050;
    3. 中国科学院生物物理研究所脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101;
    4. 首都医科大学附属复兴医院高压氧科, 北京 100038
徐珑,主治医师,研究方向为神经外科学、神经损伤、神经重症和脑认知科学,电子信箱:forrest1204@139.com

收稿日期: 2016-12-27

  修回日期: 2017-01-17

  网络出版日期: 2017-02-28

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2012CB825505)

Study on the prognosis and functional recovery of patients with disorder of consciousness by bedside electroencephalogram test

  • XU Long ,
  • WANG Bo ,
  • WANG Yong ,
  • ZHAO Jizong
Expand
  • 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China;
    2. China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    4. Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China

Received date: 2016-12-27

  Revised date: 2017-01-17

  Online published: 2017-02-28

摘要

针对意识障碍患者残余脑功能的检测和预后相关性研究是重要的科学问题。本文探讨了事件相关电位中的失匹配负波(MMN)在预测重症颅脑损伤后意识障碍(DOC)患者意识恢复及远期预后中的临床价值。通过对6例重症颅脑损伤后意识障碍患者进行MMN检测,之后长期随访其意识水平变化,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。微意识状态(MCS)较植物状态(VS)患者出现MMN的可能性更大,而出现MMN的微意识状态患者远期较恢复意识的可能性更大,未出现MMN的植物状态患者恢复意识可能性最小。因此,作为事件诱发脑电的经典范式,MMN有可能预测意识障碍患者意识恢复,并与长期预后相关。

本文引用格式

徐珑 , 王波 , 王泳 , 赵继宗 . 意识障碍患者的床旁脑电测试与功能恢复预后研究[J]. 科技导报, 2017 , 35(4) : 68 -73 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2017.04.012

Abstract

The relationship between the testing results of remnant functions of patients with consciousness disorder and their prognosis is an important issue. Our study focuses on the clinical value of the mismatch negativity(MMN) applied for predicting the consciousness recovery and the long-term prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury patients. A retrospective research considers 6 cases of DOC, induced by severe brain injury. The Mismatch Negativity (MMN) is tested and the long-term follow-up is made to record the variation of consciousness. A higher incidence rate of the MMN can be observed in MCS cases than in VS cases. In the long-term recovery, the MCS cases with MMN have more possibility of recovering to consciousness, but not the VS cases without MMN. Thus, as one of classical protocols of the event related potential(ERP), the MMN might be a method for predicting the consciousness recovery in the DOC cases, related with their prognosis.

参考文献

[1] Laureys S, Owen A M, Schiff N D. Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders[J]. Lancet Neurology, 2004, 3(9):537-546.
[2] Braakman R, Jennett W B, Minderhoud J M. Prognosis of the posttrau-matic vegetative state[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1988, 95(1/2):49-52.
[3] Pagani M, Leonardi M, Covelli V, et al. Risk factors for mortality in 600 patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states[J]. Journal of Neurology, 2014, 261(6):1144-1152.
[4] Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, et al. Late recovery after traumatic, an-oxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative 8 tate[J]. Neurology, 2010, 75(3):239-245.
[5] Sazbon L, Zagreba F, Ronen J, et al. Course and outcome of patients in vegetative state of nontraumatic aetiology[J]. Journal of Neurology, Neu-rosurgery & Psychiatry, 1993, 56(4):407-409.
[6] Boveroux P, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno M A, et al. Breakdown of with-in-and between-network resting state functional magnetic resonaneejmag-ing connectivity during propofol-included loss of consciousness[J]. Anesthesiology, 2010, 113(5):1038-1053.
[7] Bricolo A, Turazzi S, Feriotti G. Prolonged posttraumatic uuconscious-ness:Therapeutic assets and liabilities[J]. Journal of Neurology, 1980, 52(5):625-634.
[8] Levy D E, Knill-Jones R P, Plum F. The vegetative state and its prog-nosis following nontraumatic coma[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1978, 315(1):293-306.
[9] Sattin D, Covelli V, Pagani M, et al. Do diagnostic differences between vegetative slate and minimally conscious state patients correspond to differences in functioning and disability profiles? Results from an obser-vational multi-center study on patients with DOC[J]. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2014, 50(3):309-321.
[10] Eilander H J, van Heugten C M, Wijnen V J, et al. Course of recovery and prediction of outcome in young patients in a prolonged vegetative or minimally eonscious state after severe brain injury:An exploratory study[J]. Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 2013, 6(2):73-83.
[11] Luaute J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L, et al. Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states[J]. Neurology, 2010, 75(3):246-252.
[12] Gusnard D A, Raichle M E, Raicllle M E. Searching for a baseline:Functional imaging and the resting human brain[J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2001, 2(10):685-694.
[13] Boly M, Tshibanda L, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Functional connectivi-ty in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegeta-tive but not in a brain dead patient[J]. Human Brain Mapping. 2009, 30(8):2393-2400.
[14] Di H B, Yu S M, Weng X C, et al. Cerebral response to patient's own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states[J]. Neurology, 2007, 68(12):895-899.
[15] Owen A M, Coleman M R, Boly M, et al. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state[J]. Science, 2006, 313(5792):1221-1221.
[16] Lehembre R, Marie A B, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Resting-state EEG study of comatose patients:A connectivity and frequency analy-sis to 6th differences between vegetative and minimally conscious states[J]. Functional Neurology, 2012, 27(1):41-47.
[17] Fischer C, Luaute J, Morlet D. Even-relaled potentials (MMN and nov-elty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states[J]. Clin-ical Neurophysiology, 2010, 121(7):1032-1042.
[18] Näätänen R, Gaillard A W, Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attentionef-fect on evoked potential reinterpreted[J]. Acta Psychologica, 1978, 42(4):313-329.
[19] Kane N M, Curry S H, Rowlands C A, et al. Event-related poten-tials-Neurophysiological tools for predicting emergence and early out-come from traumatic coma[J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 1996, 22(1):39-46.
[20] Kotchoubey B, Lang S, Mezger G, et al. Information processing in se-vere disorders of consciousness:Vegetative state and minimally con-scious stale[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2005, 116(10):2441-2453.
[21] Wijnen V J, van Boxtel G J, Eilander H J, et al. Mismatch negativity predicts recovery from the vegetative state[J]. Clinical Neurophysiolo-gy, 2007, 118(3):597-605.
[22] Pegado F, Bekinschtein T, Chausson N, et al. Probing the lifetimes of auditory novelty detection processes[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2010, 48(10):3145-3154.
[23] Laureys S. The neural correlate of (un)awareness:Lessons from the vegetative state[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2005, 9(12):556-559.
[24] Di Perri C, Thibaut A, Heine L, et al. Measuring consciousness in co-ma and related states[J]. World journal of radiology, 2014, 6(8):589-597.
[25] Shen X, Luo H. Studies on the mismatch negative wave andits clinical applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases, 2014, 17(8):127-129.
[26] Fischer C, Morlet D, Bouchet P, et al. Mismatch negativity and late au-ditory evoked potentials in comatose patients[J]. Clinical Neurophysiol-ogy, 1999, 110(9):1601-1610.
[27] Luauté J, Fischer C, Adeleine P, et al. Late auditory and event-relat-ed potentials can be useful to predict good functional outcome after co-ma[J]. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2005, 86(5):917-923.
[28] Tzovara A, Rossetti A O, Spierer L, et al. Progression of auditory dis-crimination based on neural decoding predicts awakening from coma[J]. Brain, 2013, 136(1):81-89.
[29] Rossetti A O, Tzovara A, Murray M M, et al. Automated auditory mis-match negativity paradigm improves coma prognostic accuracy after cardiac arrest and therapeutic hypothermia[J]. Journal of Clinical Neu-rophysiology Official Publication of the American Electroencephalo-graphic Society, 2014, 31(4):356-361.
[30] Schall U. Is it time to move mismatch negativity into the clinic?[J]. Biological Psychology, 2016(116):41-46.
文章导航

/