中国地形地质条件复杂，是世界上地质灾害最严重的国家之一。随着新型城镇化规划布局的实施，地质灾害风险格局将发生新的改变。结合国际社会防灾减灾领域科技发展的新趋势，从推动科技创新、创新调查评价、强化风险管理3个方面提出对策建议，以期提质增效，提升防灾减灾科技支撑能力，减缓新型城镇化进程中的地质灾害风险。
Geological conditions are complex in China, and China is one of the countries suffering most serious geological disasters in the world. With the implementation of the new urbanization planning, the geological disaster risk pattern will change. Based on the analysis of overall situation of national geo-disasters and new urbanization planning and the international development trend of science and technology of disaster prevention and mitigation, this paper proposes a series of suggestions in terms of promoting scientific and technological innovation, innovative geo-disaster survey and risk assessment, and strengthening risk management. These suggestions may enhance the quality and efficiency of geo-disaster prevention and risk mitigation, strengthen the capacity of technology support for geo-disaster risk mitigation, and reduce the geo-disaster risk during the process of new urbanization of China.
[1] International Council for Science. A science plan for integrated re-search on disaster risk:Addressing the challenge of natural and humaninduced environmental hazards[R]. Paris:ICSU, 2008.
[2] International Centre for Geohazards(ICG) at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) in Norway. Summary report of Safeland-Living with land-slide risk in Europe:Assessment, effects of global change, and risk man-agement strategies[R]. Oslo:NGI, 2012.
[3] Holmes R R, Jr, Jones L M, Eidenshink J C, et al. U.S. Geological Sur-vey natural hazards science strategy:Promoting the safety, security, and economic well-being of the Nation:U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1383-F[R]. Reston, United States:USGS, 2012.
[4] The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai frame-work for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030[R]. Sendai:United Nations, 2015.
[5] Ng K C, Parry S, King J P, et al. Guidelines for natural terrain hazard studies[R]. Hong Kong:GEO, 2003.
[6] Trigila A, Iadanza C, Spizzichino D. Quality assessment of the Italian Landslide Inventory using GIS processing[J]. Landslide, 2010, 7(4):455-470.
[7] Burns W J, Coe J A, Kaya B S, et al. Analysis of elevation changes de-tected from multi-temporal LiDAR Surveys in Forested landslide ter-rain in western Oregon[J]. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 2010, 16(4):315-341.
[8] The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. Statewide landslide information database for Oregon(SLIDO)[EB/OL]. (2014-12-29)[2016-06-20]. http://www.oregongeology.org/slido/index.html.
[9] The California Geological Survey. CGS information warehouse:Regulato-ry maps[EB/OL].[2016-06-20]. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/in-formationwarehouse/index.html.
[10] Corominas J, Van Westen C J, Frattini P, et al. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2014, 73(2):209-263.
[11] Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, et al. Guidelines for landslide suscep-tibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning[J]. Engineering Geology, 2008, 102(3):85-98.
[12] Chacón J, Irigaray C, Fernández T, et al. Engineering geology maps:Landslides and geographical information systems[J]. Bulletin of Engi-neering Geology and the Environment, 2006, 65(4):341-411.
[13] Pennington C, Freeborough K, Dashwood C, et al. The national land-slide database of Great Britain:Acquisition, communication and the role of social media[J]. Geomorphology, 2015, 249:44-51.
[14] Van Westen C J, Castellanos E, Kuriakose S L. Spatial data for land-slide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment:An overview[J]. Engineering Geology, 2008, 102(3-4):112-131.
[15] Coe J A, Baum R L,Allstadt K E, et al. Rock-avalanche dynamics re-vealed by large-scale field mapping and seismic signals at a highly mobile avalanche in the West Salt Creek valley, western Colorado[J]. Geosphere, 2016, 12(2):607-631.
[16] LaHusen S R, Duvall A R, Booth A M, et al. Surface roughness dating of long-runout landslides near Oso, Washington (USA), reveals persis-tent postglacial hillslope instability[J]. Geological Society of America, 2016, 44(2):111-114.
[17] Wasowski J, Keefer D K, Lee C T. Toward the next generation of re-search on earthquake-induced landslides:Currentissues and future challenges[J]. Engineering Geology, 2011, 122(1):112-131.
[18] Marc O, Hovius N, Meunier P, et al. Transient changes of landslide rates after earthquakes[J]. Geological Society of America, 2015, 43(10):883-886.
