专题论文

从学术界和工业界两个视角看设计科学

  • 李响
展开
  • 上海图阅智能科技有限公司, 上海 200240
李响,首席研究员,研究方向为设计科学、设计方法学、智能设计等,电子信箱:xiang.lee@sysgraph.cn

收稿日期: 2017-09-15

  修回日期: 2017-10-23

  网络出版日期: 2017-11-29

The design science as seen from academic and industrial perspectives

  • LI Xiang
Expand
  • SysGraph Lab, Shanghai 200240, China

Received date: 2017-09-15

  Revised date: 2017-10-23

  Online published: 2017-11-29

摘要

阐述了设计科学的内涵,从学术界视角介绍了国外两种设计科学框架。分析了中国设计领域当前存在的问题,从工业界视角提出了新的"以模型为中心"的设计科学范式。提出设计科学研究应关注设计知识的数字化和模型化表达、模型的标准化、基于模型的知识流动机制、模型如何集成4个方面。

本文引用格式

李响 . 从学术界和工业界两个视角看设计科学[J]. 科技导报, 2017 , 35(22) : 19 -24 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2017.22.002

Abstract

This paper discusses the contents of the design science, and two kinds of design science models from the academic perspective. In view of some problems in the Chinese design domain, a novel digital model-based design science paradigm is proposed from the industrial perspective. It is suggested that the design science should include four research fields:(1) how to represent the design knowledge with a digital model; (2) the standard of the digital model; (3) the mechanism of the digital model-based knowledge flow; (4) how to integrate the digital model.

参考文献

[1] 谢友柏. 设计科学的争论和设计竞争力[J]. 中国工程科学, 2014(8):4-13.
[2] Simon H A. The sciences of the artificial[M]. The MIT Press, 1969.
[3] Vladimir Hubka, Ernst Eder. Design science, introduction to the needs, scope and organization of engineering design knowledge[M]. Springer, 1996.
[4] Aline Dresch, Daniel Pacheco Lacerda, Jose Antonio Valle Antunes. Design science research:A method for science and technology advancement[M]. Springer, 2015.
[5] Design Science[EB/OL]. 2017-10-22. http://www.designsciencejournal.org.
[6] Papalambros P Y. Design science:Why, what and how[J]. Design Science, 2015(1):1-38.
[7] Eekels J. On the fundamentals of engineering design science:The geography of engineering design science:Part 1[J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2000, 11(4):377-397.
[8] Eekels J. On the fundamentals of engineering design science:The geography of engineering design science:Part 2[J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2001, 12(3):255-281.
[9] Ho Chunheng. Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking:Differences between novices and experts[J]. Design Studies, 2001, 22(1):27-45.
[10] Ahmed S, Wallace K M, Blessing L T M. Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2003, 24(1):1-11.
[11] Nigel Cross. Expertise in design:An overview[J]. Design Studies, 2004, 25(5):427-441.
[12] Ralph P, Wang Y. A proposal for a formal definition of the design concept[C]//Lyytinen K, ed. Design requirement engineering:A ten-year perspective. Springer, 2009:103-136.
[13] Romme A G L. Making a difference:Organization as design[J]. Organization Science, 2003, 14(5):558-573.
[14] 刘玉生, 蒋玉芹, 高曙明. 模型驱动的复杂产品系统设计建模综述[J]. 中国机械工程, 2010(6):741-749.
[15] 刘玉生, 袁文强, 樊红日, 等. 基于SysML的模型驱动复杂产品设计的信息集成框架研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012(12):1438-1445.
[16] 刘玉生. 砥砺前行——与世界同步发展MBSE技术[N]. 中国航空报, 2016-07-21.
[17] About the OMG® specifications catalog[EB/OL]. 2017-10-22. http://www.omg.org/spec.
[18] 谢友柏. 设计科学中关于知识的研究——经济发展方式转变中要考虑的重要问题[J].中国工程科学, 2013(4):14-22.
[19] 谢友柏. 基于互联网的设计知识服务研究——分析中国工程科技知识中心(CKCEST)的功能[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017(6):631-641.
[20] 李响. 面向开放式创新的产品集成设计理论与方法研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2014.
[21] 李响, 曹远国, 张执南, 等. 基于智能规划的自动化概念设计综合方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2014(8):1134-1141.
[22] 李响, 张执南, 陈斌, 等. 面向开放式创新的知识服务平台的构建与实践[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2014(5):99-105.
[23] Open services for lifecycle collaboration[EB/OL]. 2017-10-22. http://open-services.net/.
[24] Koneksys:Open services for lifecycle collaboration[EB/OL]. 2017-10-22. https://oslc.github.io.
文章导航

/