研究论文

脉冲水解酸化-A/O生物反应器处理石化废水的中试研究及微生物群落结构解析

  • 施云芬 ,
  • 郑蕾 ,
  • 马慧 ,
  • 丁鹏元 ,
  • 初里冰
展开
  • 1. 东北电力大学化工学院, 吉林 132012;
    2. 北京市规划委员会通州分局, 北京 101101;
    3. 清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院先进核能技术创新中心, 北京 100084
施云芬,教授,研究方向为污水处理,电子信箱:shiyunfen0220@163.com

收稿日期: 2017-05-16

  修回日期: 2017-08-04

  网络出版日期: 2017-12-16

基金资助

国家水体污染控制与治理重大专项(2012ZX07201-005-06-01)

Pilot-scale study on treatment of petrochemical wastewater by hydrolysis-acidification with pulse water allocation and anoxic/oxic processes and analysis of microbial community

  • SHI Yunfen ,
  • ZHENG Lei ,
  • MA Hui ,
  • DING Pengyuan ,
  • CHU Libing
Expand
  • 1. School of Chemical Engineering, Northeast Dianli University, Jilin 132012, China;
    2. Beijing Municipal Commission of Urban Planning Tongzhou District Branch, Beijing 101101, China;
    3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received date: 2017-05-16

  Revised date: 2017-08-04

  Online published: 2017-12-16

摘要

采用自行设计的脉冲布水器,建造脉冲水解酸化-A/O(厌氧好氧工艺法)中试装置处理实际石化废水。水解酸化池和A/O的容积分别2.6 m3和3.9 m3;脉冲布水器的频次为10次/h;A/O池污泥龄25 d,污泥回流比100%,温度15~32℃。反应器稳定运行近7个月的结果表明:尽管进水化学需氧量(COD)和氨氮波动较大,但出水COD和氨氮的去除率保持稳定。在进水COD质量浓度为(458±107)mg·L-1,系统COD去除率为80%,其中脉冲水解酸化池(PHA)的COD去除率为29%。进水氨氮质量浓度为(35.9±11.3)mg·L-1,系统氨氮的去除率为86%。UV254和TN的平均去除率约为58%,TP去除率可达86%。PHA泥水混合良好,出水挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)浓度比进水提高近1倍,BOD5(5天生化需氧量)/COD值比进水提高35%,显示其良好的水解酸化效果,并可提高进水的可生化性。Ilumina Miseq测序结果表明:变形菌门(Proteobacteria)和拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)是主要的优势菌群,所占的比例在50%以上。在属的水平上,AnaerolineaceaeClostridiales在水解酸化池中丰度较高;A/O池中丰度较高的菌属为Flexibacter,Thiobacillu,NitrosomonadaceaeNitrospira。通过反应器各段不同微生物种群的共同作用,石化废水中复杂的有机污染物得以有效降解。结果表明,脉冲布水水解酸化-A/O工艺是一种很有前途的石化废水处理技术,并可应用于其他工业废水的处理。

本文引用格式

施云芬 , 郑蕾 , 马慧 , 丁鹏元 , 初里冰 . 脉冲水解酸化-A/O生物反应器处理石化废水的中试研究及微生物群落结构解析[J]. 科技导报, 2017 , 35(23) : 39 -45 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2017.23.006

Abstract

In the present study, a pilot-scale process of anaerobic hydrolysis-acidification with pulse water allocation (PHA) and anoxic/oxic (A/O) reactors was developed to treat actual petrochemical wastewater. The effective volume of PHA and A/O reactor was 2.6 m3 and 3.9 m3, respectively. The impulse frequency of the pulse tank was 10 times per hour. The sludge retention time of A/O reactor maintained at 25 d. The sludge from the settling tank was recycled into the anoxic tank with a recirculation ratio of 100%. The temperatures of the system ranged 15~32℃. The results during nearly 7-months operation showed that the removal efficiency of COD and ammonium remained stable although the influent COD and ammonium fluctuated. At the influent COD concentration of (458 ±107) mg·L-1, the COD removal efficiency reached 80% on average, in which the PHA reactor contributed around 29% COD removal. The average ammonium removal was 86% at the influent ammonium concentration of (35.9 ±11.3) mg·L-1. The removal efficiency of UV254 and TN was around 58%. The TP removal could reach 86%. The PHA reactor exhibited good mixing of wastewater and sludge and a higher efficiency of acidogenic fermentation. The VFA levels in the PHA effluent were higher nearly twice than that in the influent. The ratio of BOD5/COD of PHA effluent increased by 35% compared to that in influent, indicating that the biodegradability of the petrochemical wastewater was improved by PHA treatment. Results of Ilumina Miseq pyrosequencing demonstrated that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were highly enriched in the system with abundance of more than 50% at the phylum levels. The predominant genera in PHA and A/O tanks were Anaerolineaceae and Clostridiales, Flexibacter, Thiobacillus, Nitrosomonadaceae and Nitrospira, respectively. The complex petrochemical wastewater was degraded efficiently owing to combined contribution of different bacteria in each tank. The above results demonstrate that the PHA-A/O process is a promising technique to treat petrochemical wastewater and could be applied in the treatment of other industrial wastewater.

参考文献

[1] Liu S, Ma Q S, Wang B Z, et al. Advanced treatment of refractory organic pollutants in petrochemical industrial wastewater by bioactive enhanced ponds and wetland system[J]. Ecotoxicology, 2014, 23(4):689-698.
[2] Hami M L, Al-Hashimi M A, AL-Doorri M M. Effect of activated carbon on BOD and COD removal in a dissolved air flotation unit treating refinery wastewater[J]. Desalination, 2007, 216(1-3):116-122.
[3] 胡艳东. 气浮-水解酸化-反应沉淀-接触氧化处理石化废水[J]. 环境工程, 2012, 30(S2):127-129. Hu Yandong. Treatment of petrochemical wastewater by flotation-hydrolysis acidification-coagulant sedimentation-aerobic oxidation processes[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2012, 30(S2):127-129.
[4] Shokrollahzadeh S, Azizmohseni F, Golmohammad F, F et al. Biodegradation potential and bacterial diversity of a petrochemical wastewater treatment plant in Iran[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(14):6127-6133.
[5] Guo J, Ma F, Chang C, et al. Start-up of a two-stage bioaugmented anoxic-oxic (A/O) biofilm process treating petrochemical wastewater under different DO concentrations[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(14):3483-3488.
[6] Ma F, Guo J, Zhao L, et al. Application of bioaugmentation to improve the activated sludge system into the contact oxidation system treating petrochemical wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(2):597-602.
[7] Qin J, Oo M H, Tao G, et al. Feasibility study on petrochemical wastewater treatment and reuse using submerged MBR[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 293(1):161-166.
[8] 宋梦琪, 周春江, 马鲁铭. 水解酸化工艺处理印染废水的机理[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(1):102-106. Song Mengqi, Zhou Chunjiang, Ma Luming. Mechanism of printing and dyeing wastewater treatment by hydrolysis and acidification process[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(1):102-106.
[9] Wang K, Li W, Gong X, et al. Biological pretreatment of tannery wastewater using a full-scale hydrolysis acidification system[J]. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 2014, 95:41-45.
[10] 沈连峰, 申艳萍, 刘文霞, 等. 物化-水解酸化-A/O组合法处理焦化废水[J]. 水处理技术, 2007, 33(9):90-93. Shen Lianfeng, Shen Yanxia, Liu Wenxia, et al. Treatment of coking wastewater by physicochemical hydrolysis-acidification-A/O combined process[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2007, 33(9):90-93.
[11] Lei G, Ren H, Ding L, et al. A full-scale biological treatment system application in the treated wastewater of pharmaceutical industrial park[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(15):5852-5861.
[12] 王星, 初里冰, 丁鹏元, 等. 微氧水解酸化处理石化废水的生物降解特性[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(1):161-167. Wang Xing, Chu Libing, Ding Pengyuan, et al. Biodegradation characteristics of petrochemical wastewater by micro-aerobic hydrolysis acidification[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015, 35(1):161-167.
[13] Bai J, Xu H, Zhang Y, et al. Combined industrial and domestic wastewater treatment by periodic allocating water hybrid hydrolysis acidification reactor followed by SBR[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 70:115-119.
[14] 徐灏龙, 白俊跃, 王付超, 等. 升流式复合水解酸化工艺处理印染废水[J]. 环境工程, 2009, 27(S1):617-619. Xu Jinglong, Bai Junyue, Wang Fuchao, et al. Treatment of printing and dyeing wastewater by upflow anaerobic hybrid reactor[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2009, 27(S1):617-619.
[15] 贾明昊. 脉冲布水厌氧流化床处理麦草制浆中段废水技术研究[D]. 山东大学, 2010. Jia Minghao. Study on straw pulp waste water treatment by anaerobic fluidized bed with pulse water distribution[D]. Shangdong University, 2010.
[16] 郭迎庆. 水解酸化-生物接触氧化-混凝气浮工艺处理印染废水[J]. 环境工程, 2005, 23(6):30-32. Guo Yingqing. Treatment of printing and dyeing wastewater by hydrolytic acidification contact oxidation-air flotation process[J]. 4 ed. Environmental Engineering, 2005, 23(6):30-32.
[17] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水检测分析方法[M]. 第四版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Water and wastewater monitoring methods[M]. Beijing:Chinese Environmental Science Publishing House, 2002.
[18] 贺延龄. 废水的厌氧生物处理[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社, 1998. He Yanling. Anaerobic biological treatment of wastewater[M]. Beijing:China Light Industry Press, 2002.
[19] 丁鹏元, 初里冰, 张楠, 等. O池溶解氧水平对石化废水A/O工艺污染物去除效果和污泥微生物群落的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(2):604-611. Ding Pengyuan, Chu Libing, Zhang Nan, et al. Effects of dissolved oxygen in the oxic parts of A/O reactor on degradation of organic pollutants and analysis of microbial community for treating petrochemical wastewater[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(2):604-611.
[20] Snaidr J, Amann R, Huber I, et al. Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of bacteria in activated sludge[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1997, 63(7):2884-2896.
[21] Nakansak K, Idemoto Y, Abe M, et al. Comparison of organic matter degradation and microbial community during thermophilic composting of two different types of anaerobic sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(2):676-682
[22] Narihiro T, Terda T, Ohashi A, et al. Quantitative detection of previously characterized syntrophic bacteria in anaerobic wastewater treatment systems by sequence-specific rRNA cleavage method[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(7):2167-2175.
[23] Chu C, Ebie Y, Xu K, et al. Characterization of microbial community in the two-stage process for hydrogen and methane production from food waste[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(15):8253-8261
[24] Cao J, Lai Q, Liu Y, et al. Ottowia beijingensis sp. nov., isolated from coking wastewater activated sludge, and emended description of the genus Ottowia[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2014, 64(3):963-967
文章导航

/