专题论文

国外智库影响力的形成及传播过程——基于信息-解决方案链的视角

  • 李宏 ,
  • 杨文慧 ,
  • 冷伏海
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3. 中国科学院文献情报中心, 北京 100190
李宏,研究员,研究方向为科技政策与情报,电子信箱:lihong@casipm.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2018-05-16

  修回日期: 2018-07-31

  网络出版日期: 2018-08-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(71741029)

Generation and propagation of think tank influence: An information-solution chain based perspective

  • LI Hong ,
  • YANG Wenhui ,
  • LENG Fuhai
Expand
  • 1. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received date: 2018-05-16

  Revised date: 2018-07-31

  Online published: 2018-08-29

摘要

智库不断涌现,其竞争日趋激烈;智库影响力是智库的核心竞争力和建设成果,也是智库可持续发展的基石。以信息-解决方案链为引领,结合知识运用理论、精英理论和传播学理论,从影响力的构成要素着手,通过文献、网络调研和国外案例分析,构建了智库影响力形成及传播机制的5个阶段;分析了国外智库建设经验,提出智库应提高影响力建设意识,在增强自身实力的基础上关注受众需求,有计划地进行产品及服务的传导。

本文引用格式

李宏 , 杨文慧 , 冷伏海 . 国外智库影响力的形成及传播过程——基于信息-解决方案链的视角[J]. 科技导报, 2018 , 36(16) : 70 -77 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2018.16.008

Abstract

Chinese think tanks are thriving and facing a rat race. The think tank influence concerns the core competitiveness and the outcome of the think tank work, and is a cornerstone of the sustainable development of the think tanks. Based on the information-solution chain, combined with the knowledge utilization theory, the elite theory and the communication theory, this paper presents a five-stage mechanism of the generation and propagation of the think tank influence. Starting from the constitutive elements of the influence, the literature/network investigations and case studies, this paper reviews the think tank development and makes relevant suggestions. Think tanks are supposed to enhance their influence, to improve their strength and ability, to listen to the public demand and to provide their products and services systematically.

参考文献

[1] Scruton R. A dictionary of political thought[M]. London:MacMillan Press, 1982:224.
[2] Rich A. Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2004:152.
[3] 王莉丽. 旋转门:美国思想库研究[M]. 北京:国家行政学院出版社, 2010. Wang Lili. Revolving door:A study of American think tanks[M]. Beijing:National Administration Institute Press, 2010.
[4] 朱旭峰. 中国思想库:政策过程中的影响力研究[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2009.Zhu Xufeng. Chinese think tanks:a study of the influence of policy process[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2009.
[5] 陈媛媛, 李刚, 关琳. 中外智库影响力评价研究述评[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015(4):35-45. Chen Yuanyuan, Li Gang, Guan Lin. Review of research on influence evaluation of Chinese and foreign think tanks[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2015(4):35-45.
[6] 孔媛, 李宏. 从知识资本增值路径分析我国智库转型发展方向[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2017, 2(1):16-22. Kong Yuan, Li Hong. The reform path of China's think tanks from the perspective of the added-value path of knowledge capital[J]. Think Tanks:Theory and Practice, 2017, 2(1):16-22.
[7] 费雷德·昆斯, 刘柯兰, 冯胜, 等. 智库的传播与影响力指标[J]. 决策与信息, 2016(8):93-100. Ferred Kuns, Liu Kelan, Feng Sheng, et al. The dissemination and influence indicators of think tanks[J]. Decision and Information, 2016(8):93-100.
[8] 上海社会科学院智库研究中心项目组. 中国智库影响力的实证研究与政策建议[J]. 社会科学, 2014(4):4-21. The project group of the Research Center of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences. Empirical research on the influence of Chinese think tanks and policy recommendations[J]. Social Sciences, 2014(4):4-21.
[9] 帕雷托. 精英的兴衰[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2003. Pareto. The rise and fall of the elite[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2003.
[10] 梁战平. 情报学若干问题辨析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2003, 26(3):193-198. Liang Zhanping. Analysis of some problems in information science[J]. Information Theory and Practice, 2003, 26(3):193-198.
[11] 潘教峰. 科技智库研究的DⅡS理论方法[N]. 中国科学报, 2017-01-09(7). Pan Jiaofeng. The DⅡS theory for research of science and technology think tanks[N]. China Science Daily, 2017-01-09(7).
[12] Brookings. 2017 annual report[EB/OL].[2018-04-30]. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2017-annual-report.pdf.
[13] The Japan Institute of International Affairs. Resource library[EB/OL].[2018-07-28]. https://www.jiia-jic.jp/en/resourcelibrary/.
[14] The Japan Institute of International Affairs. Annual brochure February 2018[EB/OL]. (2018-05)[2018-07-28]. http://www2.jiia.or.jp/en/pdf/AnnualBrochure/AnnualBrochure2018.pdf.
[15] Brookings. Brookings books[EB/OL].[2018-07-28]. https://www.brookings.edu/search/?s=&post_type=book&topic=&pcp=&date_range=year&start_date=&end_date=.
[16] 朱猛. 日本智库的运作机制[D]. 北京:外交学院, 2015. Zhu Meng. The operation mechanism of Japanese think tanks[D]. Beijing:China Foreign Affairs University, 2015.
文章导航

/