作为知识转化的重要平台，科技智库起着重要的决策支撑作用。选择科技发达国家典型科技智库，从面向决策的选题、知识转化过程中程序的标准化、团队组织及信息搜集、品牌化质量控制、社会化成果传播机制等方面进行分析，提出各阶段转化能力需求及机制。建议科技智库通过标准化咨询程序设计，系统组织专家、智库研究人员、管理人员开展咨询研究，加强数据搜集分析能力，提出行之有效的政策建议。
As an important platform for knowledge transformation, the science and technology think tanks play an important role in supporting the decision-making. Through the analysis of the typical government science and technology think tanks, this paper summarizes the decision-making-oriented issues, the standard process of knowledge transformation, the team organization and coordination, the information collection, the quality assurance of reports, and the achievement transmission mechanism, and proposes the needs for the knowledge transformation and mechanisms at each stage. It is recommended to systematically organize experts, think tank researchers, and managers through the design standardized consulting procedure, pay more attention to the data collection and the analysis skills, and provide effective policy advice.
[1] Dinesh D, Zougmore R B, Vervoort J, et al. Facilitating change for climate-smart agriculture through science-policy engagement[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(8):21.
[2] Van Lorrae K, Louis L. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2006, 31:445-477.
[3] Cook C N, Mascia M B, Schwartz M W, et al. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary[J]. Conservation Biology, 2013, 27(4):669-678.
[4] Dunn G, Brown R R, Bos J J, et al. The role of science-policy interface in sustainable urban water transitions:Lessons from Rotterdam[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2017, 73:71-79.
[5] 傅伯杰. 地理学:从知识、科学到决策[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11):5-14.
[6] Safford H D, Sawyer S C, Kocher S D, et al. Linking knowledge to action:The role of boundary spanners in translating ecology[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2017, 15(10):560-568.
[7] Guston D H. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science:The role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization[J]. Social Studies of Science, 1999, 29(1):87-111.
[8] 王雪, 褚鑫, 宋瑶瑶, 等, 中国科技智库建设发展现状及对策建议[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36(16):53-61.
[9] Lavis J N, Robertson D, Woodside J M. et al. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?[J]. Milbank Quarterly, 2003, 81(2):221-230.
[10] Leiss W. Development of the expert panel process in Canada 1995-2005[M]. 2008.
[11] Corporate LAND. Standards for high-quality research and analysis[M/OL].[2019-05-10]. https://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP413-2015-05.html.
[12] National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Our study process:Ensuring indepent, objective adivice[M/OL].[2019-05-10]. http://www.nationalacademies.org/site_assets/groups/nasite/documents/webpage/na_069618.pdf.
[13] Kenneth L, Boufadel M, Chen B, et al. Expert panel report on the behaviour and environmental impacts of crude oil released into aqueous environments[M/OL].[2019-05-10]. http://rsc-src.ca/en/behaviour-and-environmental-impacts-crudeoil-released-into-aqueous-environments.
[14] 亚历克斯·阿贝拉. 兰德公司与美国的崛起[M]. 北京:新华出版社, 2011.
[15] 王佩亨, 李国强. 海外智库——世界主要国家智库考察报告[M]. 北京:中国财政经济出版社, 2014.
[16] 万劲波, 李培楠. 科技智库功能定位与能力建设研究[J]. 情报工程, 2018, 4(4):15-24.
