专题:科技评估

科学技术指标体系设计及评价

  • 武宇 ,
  • 李牧知 ,
  • 李延通
展开
  • 军事科学院评估论证研究中心, 北京 100091
武宇,助理研究员,研究方向为战略规划与科技评估,电子信箱:cestlavie_wuyu@yeah.net

收稿日期: 2019-05-15

  修回日期: 2019-07-10

  网络出版日期: 2019-10-19

基金资助

2019国家高端智库课题

Study of science and technology indicators system and evaluation

  • WU Yu ,
  • LI Muzhi ,
  • LI Yantong
Expand
  • Centre for Assessment and Demonstration Research, Academy of Military Science, Beijing 100091, China

Received date: 2019-05-15

  Revised date: 2019-07-10

  Online published: 2019-10-19

摘要

国际上关于国家科技活动投入产出的评价指标体系建设及其评价研究已有较长历史,产生了一些具有重要影响力的代表性研究成果。通过对世界主要科学技术指标体系进行梳理与分析,总结其研究共识与特征,分析存在问题与不足,并基于中国现有的科学技术指标研究框架,针对跻身创新型国家前列、建设世界科技强国的战略目标,提出指标体系设计、数据采集分析以及国际交流合作等方面的发展建议。

本文引用格式

武宇 , 李牧知 , 李延通 . 科学技术指标体系设计及评价[J]. 科技导报, 2019 , 37(19) : 12 -18 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2019.19.002

Abstract

There is a long history of evaluation indicator system and research about input-output of national science and technology activities, some representational research results with important influence have been achieved. In this paper, the main international scientific and technological indicators are analyzed, the characteristics are summarized and the deficiencies are discussed. Based on the existing scientific and technological indicator research framework of our country, some suggestions focusing on indicator system design, data analysis and international cooperation are proposed according to the strategic target of being in the forefront of innovative countries and building a powerful country in science and technology.

参考文献

[1] 张志强, 田倩飞, 陈云伟. 科技强国主要科技指标体系比较研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(10):1052-1063. Zhang Zhiqiang, Tian Qianfei, Chen Yunwei. Research on main scientific and technological indicators of science and technology power[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(10):1052-1063.
[2] Klaus S. The global competitiveness report:2018[EB/OL].[2018-10-29]. https://www.weforum.org/gcr.
[3] Soumitra D, Bruno L. The global innovation index 2018[EB/OL].[2018-09-19]. https://Creativecommons.Org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/lgo.
[4] National Science Board. Science and engineering indicators 2018[EB/OL].[2018-09-19]. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf.
[5] 陈钰, 徐英华. 从《科学与工程指标》 看世界科技创新格局[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望,2018, 33(1):52-57. Chen Yu, Xu Yinghua. A study of world S&T innovation development based on SEI report[J]. Global Science, Technology and Economy Outlook, 2018, 33(1):52-57.
[6] 方陵生, 梁偲. 美国《2018科学与工程指标》:全球发展趋势[J]. 世界科学, 2018(3):31-36. Fang Lingsheng, Liang Si. America《2018 Science & Engincering Indicators》:The global development trend[J]. Global Science, 2018, 3:31-36.
[7] 文部科学省科学技術·学術政策研究所. 科学技術指標2018[R/OL]. http://data.nistep.go.jp/dspace/bitstream/1103-5/3071/182/NISTEP-RM238-FullJ.pdf. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Tokyo. Japanese science and technology indicators 2018[R/OL]. http://data.nistep.go.jp/dspace/bitstream/11035/3071/182/NISTEP-RM238-FullJ.pdf.
[8] 徐婕. 日本科学技术指标概览及对中国的启示[J].全球科技经济瞭望, 2016, 31(3):51-57. Xu Jie. Introduction and enlightenment of Japanese S&T indicators[J]. Global Science, Technology and Economy Outlook, 2016, 31(3):51-57.
[9] OECD. Science, technology and industry scoreboard 2017.[2018-09-19]. http://www.oecd.org/sti/oecd-science-tech-nologyand-industry-scoreboard-20725345.htm.
[10] 中国科协创新战略研究院. 中国科学技术与工程指标[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2018. Institute of Innovation Strategies, China Association of Science and Technolog. China science, technology and engineering indicators[M]. Beijing:Tsing University Press, 2018.
文章导航

/