核心技术受制于人已成为影响中国经济安全的重中之重，技术经济安全问题亟需关注。借鉴相互依赖理论的“敏感性”与“脆弱性”概念，从技术经济安全风险的视角提出中国工业行业技术敏感性、经济敏感性、技术脆弱性与经济脆弱性4类属性和相应指标。通过因子分析法提炼出敏感性与脆弱性公共因子，将38个工业行业分为高敏感性高脆弱性、高敏感性低脆弱性、低敏感性高脆弱性、低敏感性低脆弱性4类，为开展分类监测和评估各行业技术经济安全状况，更好地保障国家经济安全提供依据。
Core technologies subject to foreign countries have become the top priority of China's economic security. The issue of techno-economic security needs urgent attention. This study draws on the concepts of "sensitivity" and "vulnerability" from interdependence theory, and proposes four categories of attributes and corresponding indicators of technological sensitivity, economic sensitivity, technological vulnerability and economic vulnerability for China's industrial sectors based on the perspective of techno-economic security. Factors of sensitivity and vulnerability are extracted using the factor analysis method and 38 industrial sectors are divided into four categories:High sensitivity and high vulnerability, high sensitivity and low vulnerability, low sensitivity and high vulnerability, low sensitivity and low vulnerability. This classification can provide a basis for conducting classified monitoring and evaluation of the techno-economic security status of various industries as well as for better safeguarding national economic security.
[1] 刘志鹏, 代涛, 李晓轩, 等. 技术经济安全的概念与内涵——从新兴学科建设的视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(3):410-417. Liu Zhipeng, Dai Tao, Li Xiaoxuan. et al. Concept and connotation of techno-economic security:From the perspective of emerging discipline construction[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(3):410-417.
[2] 岑丽君. 中国在全球生产网络中的分工与贸易地位——基于TiVA数据与GVC指数的研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2015(1):3-13, 131. Cen Lijun. China's division of labor and trade status in GPNs:a research based on TiVA data and GVC index[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2015(1):3-13, 131.
[3] 李艳芳, 杜康, 杜为公. 产业分类方法与我国轻工业发展现状[J]. 武汉工业学院学报, 2012, 31(3):83-87. Li Yanfang, Du Kang, Du Weigong. Industrial classification method and situation of light industry development in China[J]. Journal of Wuhan Polytechnic University, 2012, 31(3):83-87.
[4] OECD. The knowledge-based economy[R]. Paris:OECD, 1996:36.
[5] Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change:Towards a taxonomy and a theory[J]. Research Policy, 1984, 13(6):343-373.
[6] 姜红, 陆晓芳. 基于产业技术创新视角的产业分类与选择模型研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010(9):47-56. Jiang Hong, Lu Xiaofang. Study on industry classification and selection model based on the view of industrial technology innovation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2010(9):47-56.
[7] 罗伯特·基欧汉, 约瑟夫·奈. 权力与相互依赖[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2012. Keohane R O, Nye J S. Power and interdependence[M]. Beijing:Peking University Press, 2012.
[8] 郭铁成, 张赤东. 我国对外技术依存度究竟是多少?——基于全球化视角的测算[J]. 中国软科学, 2012(2):35-41. Guo Tiecheng, Zhang Chidong. What is the extent of china's depen-dence on foreign technology:A new global perspective[J]. China Soft Science, 2012(2):35-41.
[9] Green E M. Economic security and high technology competition in an age of transition:The case of the semiconductor industry[M]. Westport:Praeger, 1996.
[10] 柳卸林. 技术创新经济学[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2014. Liu Xielin. Economics of technological innovation[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2014.
[11] 何晓群. 现代统计分析方法与应用[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2012. He Xiaoqun. Modern statistical analysis methods and applications[M]. Beijing:China Renmin University Press, 2012.
[12] 马瑞映, 杨松. 工业革命时期英国棉纺织产业的体系化创新[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(8):183-203. Ma Ruiying, Yang Song. Systemic innovation in the British cotton textile industry during the industrial revolution[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2018(8):183-203.
