新中国成立以来，中国教育事业蒸蒸日上，取得了令世人瞩目的巨大成就。但随着社会发展及科技进步，中国教育工作中也渐显出一些缺陷。2009年之后，“钱学森之问”的说法逐渐成为探讨中国教育的核心问题，然而认真分析钱学森谈话原始文本可以发现，他未曾心存疑虑并提出过需要后人解答的问题。他指出，学习加州理工大学等高校的人才培养模式即能解决中国高等教育存在的问题。事实上，中国也有成功培养创新人才的先例，彭桓武就是一位培养优秀科技人员的楷模。研究并借鉴彭桓武培养创新人才的成功经验，有利于为中国培养更多优秀科技创新人才。
In the past 70 years, the achievements of education in New China have been remarkable, but there are also some problems. The statement of "QIAN Xuesen's question" after 2009 has gradually become the core issue of Chinese education. However, a careful analysis of the original text of QIAN Xuesen's conversation reveals that he has not raised any doubts and asked questions that need to be answered by future generations. He pointed out that studying the talent training model of universities such as Caltech can solve the problems of Chinese higher education. In fact, China also has a precedent for successfully cultivating innovative talents. PENG Huanwu was a model for cultivating outstanding scientific and technical personnel. Studying and learning from PENG Huanwu's successful experience in cultivating innovative talents is conducive to cultivating more outstanding scientific and technological talents for China.
[1] 钱学森. 钱学森的最后一次系统谈话——谈科技创新人才的培养问题[N]. 人民日报, 2009-11-05(11).
[2] 温家宝. 钱学森之问对我是很大刺痛[EB/OL].[2019-08-18]. https://edu.qq.com/a/20100505/000104.htm
[3] 杨振宁. 曙光集[M]. 翁帆, 编译. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2008:389.
[4] 马大猷. 以科学的方法领导科研事业[J]. 群言, 2000(9):1.
[5] 靳晓燕, 齐芳."钱学森之问"引发的思考[N]. 光明日报, 2009-12-05(1).
[6] 中国科学院理论物理研究所, 北京应用物理与计算数学研究所. 百年彭桓武:"默默无闻"的大师[J]. 军工文化, 2015(11):52-57.
[7] 于敏. 新中国理论物理与核科学理论的奠基人:于敏发言[J]. 物理通报, 2005(9):4-5.
[8] 黄祖洽. 三杂集[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2004:93.
[9] 钱尚武. 缅怀彭桓武老师[J]. 大学物理, 2007, 26(4):2.
[10] 黄祖洽. 黄祖洽文存[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2002:177.
[11] 薛继军. 大家之理论物理学家彭桓武[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 2005:69-76.
[12] 朱光亚. 学习彭桓武, 培养创新性人才[J]. 物理, 2006, 35(12):991-992.
[13] 郑绍唐. 回忆彭桓武对核武器事业和物理科学的贡献[J]. 现代物理知识, 2014, 26(4):13.
