当前，科学技术诸多领域在交叉汇聚过程中呈现多源爆发，科技创新资源分配向多主体参与协商的方式转变，主要国家积极构建科学、高效的科技创新治理体系应对变化。中国科技创新治理尚处于初级阶段，国际经验研究对提高中国的科技创新治理能力具有重要参考价值。围绕国际科技创新治理所涉及的重要方面——风险预警、国民协商、公私合作、政策组合、创新监管以及智慧专业化等，分析了运用有关典型政策工具实现前瞻性规划、多元主体共治、多方利益共享、优化创新资源配置、高风险技术应用监管、科技创新驱动区域发展等治理实践，为中国科技创新治理体系的科学构建提供经验。
At present, multi-source outbreak appears in the process of cross convergence in many fields of science and technology. Allocation of scientific and technological innovation resources is changing to the way of multi-body participation in consultation. Major countries have actively built a scientific and efficient scientific and technological innovation governance system to cope with the change. In this article, we focus on the important aspects of international science and technology innovation governance, including risk early warning, national consultation, public-private partnership, policy combination, innovation supervision, and smart specialization. Moreover, typical policy tools such as forward-looking planning, multiagent cogovernance, multiparty benefit sharing, optimization of innovation resource allocation, high-risk technology application supervision, and science and technology innovation driven regional development are investigated. The practice abroad can provide the experience for the scientific construction of China's science and technology innovation governance system.
[1] 王志刚. 新时代建设科技强国的战略路径[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(10):1112-1116.
[2] 郭铁成. 近年来国外创新治理实践及启示[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(8):185-192.
[3] 赵胤. 从科技管理走向科技治理[J]. 人民论坛, 2019(7):86-87.
[4] European Commission. Open innovation 2.0[M]. Luxembourg:Publication Office of the European Union, 2014.
[5] 陈喜乐, 朱本用. 近十年国外科技治理研究述评[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016(10):148-153.
[6] Alan I. The politics of talk:Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2006, 36(2):299-320.
[7] Beth P, Tim M. Governance, science policy and regions:An introduction[J]. Regional Studies, 2007, 41(8):1039-1050.
[8] 钟成林, 陈运平, 张春艳, 等. 科技创新治理能力对治理绩效的影响研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(22):27-34.
[9] 万劲波. 坚持"三个有利" 提升科技创新治理效能[N]. 科技日报, 2019-11-25(001).
[10] 万广明. 扎实推进科技创新治理体系和治理能力建设[N]. 科技日报, 2019-12-13(001).
[11] 曾盛聪, 卞思瑶. 走向大数据治理:地方治理的政策工具创新趋势——基于多个经验性案例的考察[J]. 社会主义研究, 2018(5):86-95.
[12] Horizon Scanning Centre. Exploring the future:Tools for strategic thinking[R/OL].[2019-12-31]. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100210165623/http://www.foresight.gov.uk/microsites/hsctoolkit/Horizon-scanning.html.
[13] 郭金明. 中国高技术研发国家计划的组织管理问题研究[M]. 北京:科学技术文献出版社, 2014.
[14] Office of Chief Scientist (OCS). R&D incentive programs[R/OL].[2019-11-30]. http://www.economy.gov.il/madan.
[15] European Commission. Knowledge for growth European issues and policy challenges[M]. Luxembourg:Office for official publications of the European Communities, 2008.
[16] Fellnhofer K. Visualised bibliometric mapping on smart specialization:A co-citation analysis[J]. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 2018, 9(1):76-79.
