科技赋能

科技支撑社会治理现代化:内涵、挑战及机遇

  • 张成岗 ,
  • 李佩
展开
  • 清华大学社会学系, 北京 100084
张成岗,教授,研究方向为社会治理与政策、科技社会学、全球化与社会转型,电子信箱:zcgice@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2020-04-02

  修回日期: 2020-05-12

  网络出版日期: 2020-08-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大研究项目(18VDL05);腾讯云计算社会治理合作项目(20192001963)

Science and technology supports social governance: Connotation, challenges and opportunities

  • ZHANG Chenggang ,
  • LI Pei
Expand
  • Department of Sociology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received date: 2020-04-02

  Revised date: 2020-05-12

  Online published: 2020-08-10

摘要

科技支撑社会治理体系建设是新时期社会治理领域的重要内容,是建设更高水平的平安中国的基本要求。科技支撑社会治理现代化的科学内涵体现为行动导向的3个层面、5重维度, 3个层面包括理念层面、准备层面和行动层面; 5重维度分别为社会治理体系现代化、社会治理能力现代化、社会治理方式智能化、基层社会自治、制度化渠道与非制度化渠道互补融合。科技支撑社会治理现代化面临的挑战在于:科技支撑社会治理的一线人力资源需求供应不足;科技支撑的资金需求大、资金来源单一;社会系统的发展滞后于科技的发展;科技支撑社会治理实践的因地制宜和地方经验不够。为应对上述挑战并抓住科技支撑的机遇,提出面向未来的科技支撑社会治理现代化建设的建议:对科技嵌入社会治理形成科学的认知;建立健全合作机制;搭建形成实践闭环;坚持负责任的创新,实现科技与社会的良性互构;兼顾基层下沉与领域细化。

本文引用格式

张成岗 , 李佩 . 科技支撑社会治理现代化:内涵、挑战及机遇[J]. 科技导报, 2020 , 38(14) : 134 -141 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.14.014

Abstract

Application of science and technology to social governance is an important channel to accelerate social governance modernization The scientific connotation of science and technology supporting social governance modernization is reflected in the action-oriented“three levels, five dimensions". The three levels mean the cogitation level, readiness level and action level; the five dimensions are the modernization of social governance system, modernization of social governance capabilities, intellectualization of social governance methods, autonomy of grassroots society, and complementarity and integration of institutionalized and non-institutionalized channels. The challenges faced by science and technology supporting social governance modernization include the followings. The supply of frontier human resources for social governance is inadequate; the capital needs for science and technology support are large but the capital source is single; the development of social systems lags behind the development of science and technology; and the local experience of science and technology supporting social governance practice is insufficient. In order to response to the above challenges and seize the opportunities, the paper also presents some suggestions for future social governance modernization.

参考文献

[1] 张成岗. 人工智能时代:技术发展、风险挑战与秩序重构[J]. 南京社会科学, 2018(5):42-52.
[2] 杨述明. 现代社会治理体系的五种基本构成[J]. 江汉论坛, 2015(2):57-63.
[3] Pardhasaradhi Y. Information technology for governance and efficiency[J]. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 2004, 50(1):269=276.
[4] 李强. 怎样理解"创新社会治理体制"[J]. 毛泽东邓小平理论研究, 2014(7):43-48, 91-92.
[5] 张成岗. 区块链时代:技术发展、社会变革及风险挑战[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2018(12):33-43.
[6] 郁建兴. 社会治理共同体及其建设路径[J]. 公共管理评论, 2019, 1(3):59-65.
[7] Ganegodage K R, Rambaldi A N, Rao D S P, et al. A new multidimensional measure of development:the role of technology and institutions[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2017, 131(1):65-92.
[8] 魏礼群. 习近平社会治理思想研究[J]. 中国高校社会科学, 2018(4):4-13, 157.
[9] Lake R W. Big data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism[J]. Big Data & Society, 2017(6):1-10.
[10] 张康之. 论主体多元化条件下的社会治理[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2014, 28(2):2-13.
文章导航

/