高放废物在数千年的人类生存环境中仍然存在危害性，目前基于非能动安全所提出的地质处置方案是高放废物安全管理的首选策略，其安全评价的时间尺度高达万年，处置库场址的申请和建造的审批重点在于长期安全性的论证。因此，地质处置的安全评价系统需要简化，以便于计算和预测，从而提高安全评价结果的置信度。介绍了高放废物地质处置的研究进展、地质处置的非能动安全及核技术的安全管理启示。鉴于地质处置安全的不确定性，引入了安全监管的概念。
The high level-radioactive waste might lead to sustainable harms to the environment for thousands of years, and the geological disposal has been considered as a preferred proposal for the high-level radioactive waste safety management based on the passive safety. The time scale of the safety assessment could be up to ten thousand years, and the long-term safety assessment is the focus for the application and approval process of the repository site. Therefore, the safety assessment system needs to be simplified for the calculation and the prediction to improve the reliability of the assessment results. This paper reviews the research progress of the geological disposal for the high-level radioactive waste, the passive safety of the geological disposal and the safe management enlightenment of the nuclear technology. Based on the uncertainty safety principle of the geological disposal, the concept of the safety supervision is introduced to provide the technical support for the safe management of the high-level radioactive waste geological disposal.
[1] 潘自强, 钱七虎. 高放废物地质处置战略研究[M]. 北京:原子能出版社, 2009:1-15.
[2] 刘新华, 徐春艳, 汪萍, 等. 对放射性废物分类管理的几点思考[J]. 辐射防护, 2013, 11(4):322-326.
[3] 王驹, 陈伟明, 苏锐, 等. 高放废物地质处置及其若干关键科学问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(4):801-812.
[4] 吴浩, 徐春艳, 刘新华, 等. 放射性废物处置——核能可持续发展的关键[J]. 核安全, 2013, 12(增刊1):155-159.
[5] European Commission. Establishing a community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste:Council directive 2011/70/EURATOM[R]. Brussels:EURATOM, 2011.
[6] International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA safety standards for protecting people and the environment:Disposal of radioactive waste[R]. Vienna:IAEA, 2011.
[7] International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste[R]. Ottawa:ICRP, 2013.
[8] 王驹. 高放废物地质处置:进展与挑战[J]. 中国工程科学, 2008, 10(3):58-65.
[9] 徐健, 熊先祥, 雷奇峰, 等. 我国高放废物地质处置法规体系的若干问题探讨[J]. 世界核地质科学, 2014, 31(4):601-606.
[10] 王驹. 高水平放射性废物地质处置:关键科学问题和相关进展[J]. 科技导报, 2016, 34(15):51-55.
[11] 王驹, 凌辉, 陈伟明. 高放废物地质处置库安全特性研[J]. 中国核电, 2017(2):270-278.
[12] 凌辉, 王驹, 陈伟明, 等. 高放废物地质处置安全全过程系统分析研究进展[J]. 辐射防护, 2018, 38(2):101-109.
[13] Ju W, Liang C, Rui S, et al. The Beishan underground research laboratory for geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste in China:Planning, site selection, site characterization and in situ tests[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 10(3):411-435.
[14] Erik H. Is safety a subject for science[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67:21-24.
[15] OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Regulating the longterm safety of geological disposal:Towards a common understanding of the main objectives and bases of safety criteria[R]. Paris:OECD-NEA, 2007.
[16] Weiss W, Larsson C M, Mckenney C, et al. ICRP PUBLICATION 122:Radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste[J]. Annals of the ICRP, 2013, 42(3):1-57.
[17] International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA safety standards for protecting people and the environment:Disposal of radioactive waste[R]. Vienna:IAEA, 2011.
[18] Hommels A, Mesman J, Wiebe E. Vulnerability in technological cultures:New directions in research and governance[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press, 2014:1-22.
[19] Macpherson H G, Bohm R A. Safety of nuclear power reactors[M]. Cambridge:Ballinger Publishing Co., 1982.
[20] Declan B. France ‘imagines the unimaginable’:Regulator demands safety upgrades for nuclear plants to guard against a Fukushima-like disaster[J]. Nature, 2012, 481:121-122.
[21] Scott de Martinville E, Herviou K. Safety for Gen 3 reactors:EPR case. Presented at:Topical day on Generation III Reactors[R]. Brussels:SCK-CEN, 2010.
[22] International Atomic Energy Agency. Defence in depth in nuclear safety:A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group[R]. Vienna:IAEA, 1996.
[23] International Atomic Energy Agency. Framework for an integrated risk informed decision making process INSAG-25[R]. Vienna:IAEA, 2011.
[24] International Commission on Radiological Protection. Leaflet on radiological protection and geological disposal:The guiding principles and recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection[R]. Ottawa:ICRP, 2013.
[25] Weetjens E, Marivoet J, Seetharam S. Performance indicators quantifying the contribution of safety functions to the confinement of radionuclides in a geological repository system[C]//Materials Research Society Spring Meeting 2010. San Francisco:Materiasl Research Society, 2010.
[26] Krupar S R. Transnatural ethics:Revisiting the nuclear cleanup of Rocky Flats, CO, through the queer ecology of nuclia waste[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2012, 19(3):303-327.
[27] International Atomic Energy Agency. Joint convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management:IAEA International Law Series No.1[R]. Vienna:IAEA, 2006.
[28] OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Radioactive waste management towards transparent, proportionate and deliverable regulation for geological disposal[J]. SourceOECD Nuclear Energy, 2010(1):i-197.
[29] Apted M, Ahn J. Geological repository systems for safe disposal of spent nuclear fuels and radioactive waste[M]. 2nd Ed. Cambridge:Woodhead. Publishing Press, 2017.
[30] Schröder J. Geological disposal of radioactive waste:A long-term sociotechnical experiment[J]. Science & Engineering Ethics, 2016, 22(3):687-705.
