基于创造过程、创造性的人、创造产品和创造环境这一研究路线，梳理了创造力测量的发端与发展，分析了已有测量方法的成就与不足，结合近期文献概括出创造过程测量趋于系统性、创造性的人的测量目标趋于具体化、创造产品测量趋于去评估者化以及创造环境测量趋于生态化的新特点，探讨了创造力作为一个复杂现象，未来的测量将呈现综合性评价的发展态势。
For decades, the methods and the techniques of measuring the creativity have been continuously improved. The psychometric methods in the creativity research can be grouped into four types:The creative processes, the personality and behavioral correlations of the creativity, the characteristics of the creative products, and the attributes of the creativity-fostering environment. After a brief overview in this line, this paper systematically analyzes the representative measurement tools and the common defects of existing measurement methods. It is concluded that the creative process tends to be systematic, the creative person tends to be specific, the creative products tend to be de-evaluator and the creative environments tend to be ecological. As the creavitity is a compound concept, these four dimensions cannot be treated separately. As a result of the methodology, the measurement of the creativity should be a compound one, therefore, the test methods should be multidimensional.
[1] Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity[J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 1961, 42(7):305-310.
[2] Barron F, Harrington D M. Creativity, intelligence, and personality[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1981, 32:439-476.
[3] GuilfordJ P. Creativity[J]. American Psychologist,1950(5):444-454.
[4] Sternberg R J, Lubart T I. Investing in creativity[J]. American Psychologist, 1996, 51:681.
[5] Anderson N R, West M A. Measuring climate for workgroup innovation:Development and validation of the team climate inventory[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1998, 19(3):235-258.
[6] Siegel S M, Kaemmerer W F. Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63(5):553-562.
[7] 傅世侠, 罗玲玲. 建构科技团体创造力评估模型[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2005.
[8] Isaksen S G, Lauer K J, Ekvall G. Situational outlook questionnaire:A measure of the climate for creativity and change[J]. Psychological Reports, 199985(2):665-674.
[9] Ekvall G. Organizational climate for creativity and innovation[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1996, 5(1):105-123.
[10] West M A. The social psychology of innovation in groups[C]. Innovation and creativity at work:Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester, England:Wiley, 1990:309-333.
[11] Tjosvold D, Wedley W C, Field R H G. Constructivecontroversy, the Vroom-Yetton model, and managerial decision-making[J]. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1986, 7(2):125-138.
[12] Baptiste B. Measuring creativity change and development[J]. American Psychological Association, 2019, 13(2):203-210.
[13] Robert A C, Adam B W, Richard J D, et al. Re-examining prominent measures of divergent and convergent creativity[J]. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2019, 27:90-93.
[14] Roni R P, Boris F. Scoring divergent thinking tests:A review and systematic framework[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2019, 13(2):144-152.
[15] Karwowski M, Lebuda I. The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs:A meta-analysis[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2016, 10(2):214-232.
[16] James C K. Self-Assessments of creativity:Not ideal, but better than you think[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2019, 13(2):187-192.
[17] Maciej K, Han M H, Beghetto R A. Toward dynamizing the measurement of creative confidence beliefs[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2019, 13(2):193-202.
[18] Diedrich J, Jauk E, Silvia P J, et al. Assessment of reallife creativity:The inventory of creative activities and achievements (ICAA)[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2018, 12(3):304-316.
[19] Ranjan B S C, Siddharth L, Chakrabarti A. A systematic approach to assessing novelty, requirement satisfaction, and creativity[J]. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2018, 32(4):390-414.
[20] Fleeson W. Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate:The challenge and opportunity of withinperson variability[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2004, 13(2):83-87.
[21] Hasson U, Honey C J. Future trends in Neuroimaging:Neural processes as expressed within real-life contexts[J]. NeuroImage, 2012, 62(2):1272-1278.
[22] Glaveanu V P, Tanggaard L. Creativity, identity, and representation:Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity[J]. New Ideas in Psychology, 2014, 34(1):12-21.
[23] Preiss D D. Creativity:New directions in research and assessment[J]. Learning and Individual Differences, 2016, 51:376-377.
[24] Cotter K N, Silvia P J. Ecological assessment in research on aesthetics, creativity, and the arts:Basic concepts,common questions, and gentle warnings[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2019, 13(2), 211-217.
