明确了国防技术转化的内涵，分析了美国国防部技术转化计划的设立、管理情况，探讨了影响美国国防技术转化的因素，提出了加强中国国防技术转化计划管理的建议。
The defense technology transfer is an important issue especially under the situation when China continuously invest greatly in science and technology innovation and the development of civil-military integration. This paper reviews the defense technology transfer programs of the US Department of Defense, and analyses the factors affecting the technology transfer, to provide some food of thought for China in this respect.
[1] 胡冬梅, 王建卿, 王海涛, 等. 军民两用技术研究现状及发展思路[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36(10):14-19.
[2] National Research Council. Accelerating technology transition:Bridging the valley of death for materials and processes in defense systems[M/OL]. Washington:The National Academies Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.17226/11108.
[3] Secretary of Defense. Defense Acquisition transformation report to congress[R/OL]. Washington:Department of Defense, 2007. http://www.acqnotes.com/Attachments/Defense%20Acquisition%20Transformation%20report%20to%20Congress%202007.pdf.
[4] US Government Accountability Office. Defense technology development:Management process can be strengthened for new technology transition programs[R/OL]. Washington:US Government Accountability Office, 2005, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-480.
[5] US Government Accountability Office. Best practices:Stronger practice needed to improve dod technology transition processes[R/OL]. Washington:US Government Accountability Office, 2006, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-883.
[6] US Government Accountability Office. Defense technology development:Technology transition programs support military users, but opportunities exist to improve measurement of outcomes[R/OL]. Washington:US Government Accountability Office, 2013, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-286.
[7] Department of Defense. Small business strategy[R/OL]. Washington:Department of Defense, 2019, https://business.defense.gov/Portals/57/Documents/Small%20Business%20Strategy.pdf?ver=2019-11-19-115847-510.
[8] US Government Accountability Office. Defense advanced research projects agency:Key factors drive transition of technologies, but better training and data dissemination can increase success[R/OL]. Washington:US Government Accountability Office, 2015, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-5.
[9] 李占, 李斌, 裴大茗. 跨越"死亡之谷"——美国国防实验室技术转移管理及运营模式分析[J]. 军民两用技术与产品, 2015(7):223-224.
[10] US Government Accountability Office. Dod rapid innovation program:Some technologies have transitioned to military users, but steps can be taken to improve program metrics and outcomes[R/OL]. Washington:US Government Accountability Office, 2015, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-421.
[11] US Government Accountability Office. Small business innovation research:Dod's program supports weapon systems, but lacks comprehensive data on technology transition outcomes[R/OL]. Washington:US Government Accountability Office, 2014, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-96.
[12] Department of Defense. Technology readiness assessment (TRA) deskbook[R/OL]. Washington:Department of Defense, 2009, http://acqnotes.com/acqnote/acquisitions/technology-readiness-assessment.
[13] 吴燕生. 技术成熟度及其评价方法[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2017.
[14] US Government Accountability Office. Technology readiness assessment guide:Best practices for evaluating the readiness of technology for use in acquisition programs and projects[R/OL]. Washington:US Government Accountability Office, 2020, https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-20-48G.
