长江经济带城市大气污染排放效率与产业结构变迁

蒋姝睿; 余琅; 杨瑄; 唐祎繁; 马中; 何雷鸣; 王力

doi:10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.04.005

科技导报 >

2022 , Vol. 40 >Issue 4: 42 - 54

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.04.005

专题：精准控污与绿色发展

长江经济带城市大气污染排放效率与产业结构变迁

蒋姝睿 ,
余琅 ,
杨瑄 ,
唐祎繁 ,
马中 ,
何雷鸣 ,
王力

展开

1. 中国人民大学环境学院, 北京 100872;
2. 中国水利水电科学研究院, 北京 100044;
3. 生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心, 北京 100029

蒋姝睿,博士研究生,研究方向为环境经济与管理,电子信箱:jiangshurui@ruc.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2021-03-04

修回日期: 2021-06-23

网络出版日期: 2022-03-27

收起

Urban air pollution emission efficiency and the change of industrial structures in the Yangtze River economic belt

JIANG Shurui ,
YU Lang ,
YANG Xuan ,
TANG Yifan ,
MA Zhong ,
HE Leiming ,
WANG Li

Expand

1. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
2. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100044, China;
3. Policy Research Center for Environment and Economy, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100029, China

Received date: 2021-03-04

Revised date: 2021-06-23

Online published: 2022-03-27

Fold

摘要

基于非期望产出的超效率SBM-DEA模型，评价了2007—2017年长江经济带108个城市的大气污染排放效率。通过耦合协调度模型和Tobit模型，验证了该区域产业结构变迁与大气污染排放效率的影响关系，结果发现：（1）仅有6个城市的大气污染排放效率均值达效率前沿面，大气污染排放效率均值从高到低依次为下游、中游和上游地区；（2）中上游地区城市的大气污染排放效率和产业结构合理化、产业结构高级化耦合协调度显著低于下游城市；（3）产业结构合理化、产业结构高级化有利于提高长江经济带各城市大气污染排放效率。应针对未实现大气污染排放效率和产业结构耦合协调发展的城市，重点制定产业结构发展和环境保护的一体化发展策略。

关键词： 长江经济带; 大气污染; 排放效率; 产业结构

本文引用格式

蒋姝睿 , 余琅 , 杨瑄 , 唐祎繁 , 马中 , 何雷鸣 , 王力 . 长江经济带城市大气污染排放效率与产业结构变迁[J]. 科技导报, 2022 , 40(4) : 42 -54 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.04.005

Abstract

With the super SBM-Undesirable model, this study evaluates the air pollution emission efficiency in 108 cities of the Yangtze River economic belt from 2007 to 2017. The relationship between the industrial structure evolution and the urban air pollution emission efficiency is confirmed by using the coupling coordination degree model and the Tobit model. The findings are as follows:(1) Only 6 cities reach the efficiency frontier of the average air pollution emission efficiencies. The regions in terms of the average air pollution emission efficiency from high to low are in this order:the downstream region, the midstream region and the upstream region; (2) The coupling coordination of the air pollution emission efficiency and the industrial structure rationalization, the air pollution emission efficiency and the industrial structure upgrading in the midstream and upstream cities are significantly lower than those of the downstream cities; (3) The industrial structure rationalization and the industrial structure upgrading are conducive to the improvement of the air pollution emission efficiency in cities of the Yangtze River economic belt. For the cities that have not achieved the coupling coordination of the air pollution emission efficiency and the industrial structure, the integrated development strategy of the industrial structure development and the environmental protection should be formulated.

Key words： the Yangtze River economic belt; air pollution; emission efficiency; industrial structure

参考文献

[1] 孙亚梅, 郑伟, 宁淼, 等. 论长江经济带大气污染防治的若干问题与防治对策[J]. 中国环境管理, 2018, 10(1):75-80.
[2] Fan S, Liu C, Xie Z, et al. Scanning vertical distributions of typical aerosols along the Yangtze River using elastic lidar[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 628-629:631-641.
[3] Yang W, Yuan G, Han J. Is China's air pollution control policy effective? Evidence from Yangtze River Delta cities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 220:110-133.
[4] Beelen R, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Stafoggia M, et al. Effects of long-term exposure to air pollution on naturalcause mortality:An analysis of 22 European cohorts within the multicentre ESCAPE project[J]. The Lancet, 2014, 383(9919):785-795.
[5] Chen Z, Wang J N, Ma G X, et al. China tackles the health effects of air pollution[J]. The Lancet, 2013, 382(9909):1959-1960.
[6] Guan W J, Zheng X Y, Chung K F, et al. Impact of air pollution on the burden of chronic respiratory diseases in China:time for urgent action[J]. The Lancet, 2016, 388(10054):1939-1951.
[7] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operations Research, 1978, 2(6):429-434.
[8] Zhou Z, Xu G, Wang C, et al. Modeling undesirable output with a DEA approach based on an exponential transformation:An application to measure the energy efficiency of Chinese industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 236:117717.
[9] Xie B C, Duan N, Wang Y S. Environmental efficiency and abatement cost of China's industrial sectors based on a three-stage data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 153:626-636.
[10] Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(3):498-509.
[11] Cecchini L, Venanzi S, Pierri A, et al. Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO₂ abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy):A SBM-DEA model with undesirable output[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 197:895-907.
[12] 蒋姝睿, 谭雪, 石磊, 等. 京津冀大气污染传输通道城市的工业大气污染排放效率分析-基于三阶段DEA方法[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(6):141-149.
[13] Zhao C, Zhang H, Zeng Y, et al. Total-factor energy efficiency in BRI countries:An estimation based on threestage DEA model[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(1):278.
[14] Tone K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143(1):32-41.
[15] Fang H H, Lee H S, Hwang S N, et al. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis:An alternative approach[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(4):731-734.
[16] 卢新海, 杨喜, 陈泽秀. 中国城市土地绿色利用效率测度及其时空演变特征[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(8):83-91.
[17] Tao X, Wang P, Zhu B. Provincial green economic efficiency of China:A non-separable input-output SBM approach[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 171:58-66.
[18] 王少剑, 高爽, 黄永源, 等. 基于超效率SBM模型的中国城市碳排放绩效时空演变格局及预测[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6):1316-1330.
[19] Fan J L, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. Efficiency evaluation of CO₂ utilization technologies in China:A super-efficiency DEA analysis based on expert survey[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2015, 11:54-62.
[20] 石晓然, 张彩霞, 殷克东. 中国沿海省市海洋生态补偿效率评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(7):3204-3215.
[21] 尚杰, 魏东方, 吉雪强. 技术进步、农业用水效率与回弹效应——基于我国粮食主产区面板数据的实证研究[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(11):94-100.
[22] 汪克亮, 杨力, 孟祥瑞. 中国大气环境绩效的空间差异、动态演进及其驱动机制——基于2006-2014年省际面板数据的实证分析[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2016, 38(9):13-24.
[23] Wang X, Ding H, Liu L. Eco-efficiency measurement of industrial sectors in China:A hybrid super-efficiency DEA analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 229:53-64.
[24] Zhou Z, Guo X, Wu H, et al. Evaluating air quality in China based on daily data:Application of integer data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 198:304-311.
[25] 汪艳涛, 张娅娅. 生态效率区域差异及其与产业结构升级交互空间溢出效应[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8):1276-1284.
[26] Yang W, Li L. Efficiency evaluation of industrial waste gas control in China:A study based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 179:1-11.
[27] 丁镭, 卢滢宇, 叶霜霜. 浙江省大气环境效率评价及区域差异[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(3):1075-1085.
[28] 张翱祥, 邓荣荣. 中部六省碳排放效率与产业结构优化的耦合协调度及影响因素分析[J]. 生态经济, 2021, 37(3):31-37.
[29] 马丽, 康蕾, 金凤君. 京津冀工业发展与大气污染物排放时空耦合关系分析[J]. 环境影响评价, 2018, 40(5):51-56.
[30] 周迪, 王雪芹. 中国碳排放效率与产业结构升级的耦合度及耦合路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11):2305-2316.
[31] 汪克亮, 刘悦, 杨宝臣. 京津冀城市群大气环境效率的地区差异、动态演进与影响机制[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(3):135-140.
[32] 汪克亮, 孟祥瑞, 杨宝臣, 等. 技术异质下中国大气污染排放效率的区域差异与影响因素[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(1):101-110.
[33] 陈浩, 陈平, 罗艳. 京津冀地区环境效率及其影响因素分析[J]. 生态经济, 2015, 31(8):142-146, 150.
[34] 干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2011(5):4-16.
[35] 齐园, 张永安. 产业结构演变与工业二氧化硫排放的关系——以京津冀为例[J]. 城市问题, 2015(6):54-62.
[36] Jiao J, Han X, Li F, et al. Contribution of demand shifts to industrial SO₂ emissions in a transition economy:Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 164:1455-1466.
[37] Ye H, Wang Q, Wang Y, et al. Industrial SO₂ emissions treatment in China:A temporal-spatial whole process decomposition analysis[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 243:419-434.
[38] 魏振香, 史相国. 生态可持续与经济高质量发展耦合关系分析——基于省际面板数据实证[J]. 华东经济管理, 2021, 35(4):11-19.
[39] 王少剑, 崔子恬, 林靖杰, 等. 珠三角地区城镇化与生态韧性的耦合协调研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4):973-991.
[40] 孙攀, 吴玉鸣, 鲍曙明, 等. 经济增长与雾霾污染治理:空间环境库兹涅茨曲线检验[J]. 南方经济, 2019(12):100-117.
[41] 孙攀, 吴玉鸣, 鲍曙明. 产业结构变迁对碳减排的影响研究——空间计量经济模型实证[J]. 经济经纬, 2018, 35(2):93-98.
[42] 裴耀琳, 郭淑芬. 资源禀赋约束下生产性服务业集聚的产业结构调整效应研究——基于资源型城市和非资源型城市的对比分析[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(1):62-67.

Options

文章导航

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

联系我们

访问统计

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

联系我们

访问统计