通过对全球危机生成与治理困境的反思，分析了政府与社会在科学发展过程中扮演的角色，认为全球化、后工业化时代公众对科学家的信任危机，加剧了非科学因素对社会公共部门以及政治决策的影响与干扰，降低了科学对这些危机所带来的复杂后果的预见能力，使原契约关系受到了不确定性挑战。应努力重塑普通民众与政治决策者对科学的信任，以加强科学研究对政策制定的支持；应提高完善的科学教育机制及科学与政治之间的良序互动，以促进科学对国家繁荣和社会进步发挥积极作用。
In the era of uncertainty, the global risk accumulation and linkage in various fields seriously threaten the survival of mankind. In the reflection on the generation of global crises and the dilemma of governance, and by analyzing the role of government and society in the process of scientific development, it is believed that the crisis of public trust in scientists in the era of globalization and post industrialization has intensified the impact and interference of non-scientific factors on the social public sector and political decision-making, reduced the ability of science to predict the complex consequences of these crises, and challenged the original contractual relationship with uncertainty. Therefore, on the one hand, efforts should be made to rebuild the trust of ordinary people and political decision makers in science, so as to strengthen the support of scientific research for policy-making. On the other hand, the positive role of science in national prosperity and social progress also depends on a sound science education mechanism and the orderly interactions between science and politics.
[1] Lecompte F. Interview with Edgar Morin [EB/OL]. [2020- 04-09]. https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/uncertainty-is-intrinsic-to-the-human-condition.
[2] Collins H. Experts and the will of the people: Society, populism and science[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020: 5-8.
[3] 奥利卡·舍格斯特尔.超越科学大战——科学与社会关系中迷失了的话语[M].黄颖, 译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2006: 115．
[4] 程如烟. 经合组织发布《大学—产业合作》 报告[J]. 科技中国, 2019(7): 88-90.
[5] 万尼瓦尔·布什. 科学: 没有止境的前沿[M]. 范岱年, 译. 上海: 商务印书馆, 2004: 75-80.
[6] Maslin M. Here are five of the most common climate change misconceptions, debunked[EB/OL]. (2019-09-16). https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-what-thescience-says-about-five-common-climate-change-myths.
[7] Hopf H, Matlin S A, Mehta G, et al. Blocking the hypehypocrisy-falsification-fakery pathway is needed to safeguard science[J]. Angew Chem Int, 2020(59): 2150-2154.
[8] Susan Cozzens. Teaching community engagement to engineers via a workshop approach[J]. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2019(4): 145.
[9] Boyd I L. Scientists and politics[J]. Science, 2019(366): 281.
[10] Czerski H. A crisis of trust is looming between scientists and society: It's time to talk[EB/OL]. (2017-01-27). https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2017/jan/27/acrisis-of-trust-is-looming between-scientistsand-society-its-time-to-talk.
[11] 郭佳楠. 欧美当代技术哲学研究的政策转向[J]. 武汉科技大学学报, 2021, 23(4): 451-457.
[12] Smil V. Growth: From microorganisms to megacities[M]. Cambridge M A: MIT Press, 2019: 45-50.
[13] Lenton T M, Rockström J, Gaffney O, et al. Climate tipping points: Too risky to bet against[J]. Nature, 2019(11): 592-595.
[14] Morrisette P M. The evolution of policy responses to stratospheric ozone depletion[J]. Nat: Resour, 1989(29): 793-820.
[15] Pierre Bourdieu. A theory of practice[M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1977: 147-149.
[16] Bene Dick R E. Science, diplomacy, and the montreal protocol, encyclopedia of earth, mithsonian museum of natural history[EB/OL]. (2007-06-12). http://editors.eol.org/eoearth/wiki/Science,_diplomacy,_and_the_Montreal _Protocol.
[17] Ravetz Jerome R. The no nonsense guide to science[M]. Oxford: New Internationalist, 2005: 120-123.
[18] Chaplin S. Wellcome global monitor: Wellcome trust [EB/OL]. (2018-06-01). https://wellcome.ac.uk/reports/wellcome-globalmonitor.
[19] Bucchi M. Beyond technocracy: Science, politics and citizens[M]. New York: Springer Science ＆ Business Media, 2009: 40-50.
[20] OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy. Science and innovation policy: Key challenges and opportunities[EB/OL]. (2019-01-30). https://www.oecd.org/sti/sciencetechnologyandinnovationforthe21stcenturymeetingoftheoecdcommitteeforscientificandtechnologicalpolicyatministeriallevel29-30january2019-finalcommunique.htm.
[21] Schmidt C W. Communication gap: The disconnect between what scientists say and what the public hears[J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2009(117): 548-551.
[22] Scellato G, Franzoni C, Stephen P. A mobility boost for research[J]. Science, 2017(356): 694-695.
[23] OECD. Innovation and growth: Rationale for an innovation strategy[EB/OL]. (2007-03-24). https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/39374789.pdf.
[24] Coral Davenport. Amid extreme weather, a shift among Republicans on climate change[EB/OL]. [2021-08-13]. https://https://www.seattletimes.com/author/coral-davenport.
[25] Davenport C, Landler M. Trump administration hardens its attack on climate science [EB/OL]. (2019-05-27). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/27/us/politics/trump-climate-science.html.
[26] Science News Staff． Marchers around the world tell us why they are taking to the streets for science[EB/OL]. (2017-04-13). http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/marchers-around-world-tell-us-why-theyre-taking-streets-science.
[27] Kofi Annan. A challenge to the world's scientists[J]. Science, 2003(299): 1485.
[28] 杰拉尔德·霍尔顿. 科学与反科学[M]. 范岱年, 陈养惠, 译.南昌: 江西教育出版社, 1999: 232-235.
[29] United Nations. Only 11 years left to prevent irreversible damage from climate change, speakers warn during General Assembly High-Level Meeting[EB/OL]. (2019-03- 28). https://www.un.org/press/en/2019/ga12131.doc.htm.
[30] Thunberg G. Our house is on fire[EB/OL]. (2019-01- 25). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jan/25/our-house-is-on-fire-greta-thunberg16-urges-leaders-to-act-on-climate.
[31] Nissen S B, Magidson T, Gross K, et al. Research: Publication bias and the canonization of false facts[J]. eLife, 2016(5): 214.
[32] 史蒂夫·米尔斯基. 美国官员的疫苗闹剧[J]. 科学美国人-环球科学, 2015(5):12.
