解读了有关科研诚信与科研伦理及科学家核心价值观的 3本原著， 借鉴 《科研诚信： 营造一个负责任的科研行为环境》《科学家的伦理和生物安全工具包》《真理的本能： 好奇心和科学品德》 的一些观点， 从科学家的核心价值观切入， 谈谈科研伦理与学术诚信及价值观之间的关系以及科学伦理的双重性及困境。
After reading three original books focusing on academic integrity and ethics, and appreciating the viewpoints of the original authors, the author of this paper discusses the relationship between academic integrity and ethics, as well as the dilemmas and the dual nature of the academic ethics based on the perspective of scientists' values.
[1] National Academic of Sciences. The National Academy of Sciences. Integrity in scientific research—Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct[M]. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2010.
[2] Sture J. The ethics and biosecurity toolkit for scientists [M]. Hackensack: World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd., 2016.
[3] Pennock R T. An instinct for truth： Curiosity and the moral character of science[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2019.
[4] Graves Jr J L, Kearney, Barabino G. Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda[J]. PNAS, 2022, 119(10): e2117831119.
[5] Virtues of U. S. scientists guiding scientific practice[EB/ OL]. [2022-06-01]. https://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2016/webprogram/Session12241.html.
[6] Pennock R T. Scientists reflect about ethics and trust[J]. American Scientist, 2021, 109(4): 202.
[7] The ethics issue: The 10 biggest moral dilemmas in science[J/OL]. [2022-06-01]. https://www.newscientist.com/round-up/ethics-issue.
