从科技创新的角度出发，建立“科技创新-产业结构升级-共同富裕”的研究路径，利用中介效应模型，探究科技创新与共同富裕的内在联系以及产业结构升级在科技创新促进共同富裕过程中的路径机制。得出以下结论：（1）浙江省共同富裕程度随科技创新水平的提高而提高；（2）浙江省产业结构升级不仅对共同富裕产生积极影响，而且在科技创新促进共同富裕的过程中发挥中介效应，表现出“科技创新-产业结构升级-共同富裕”的传导路径；其中，产业结构升级在科技创新与共同富裕之间的中介效应大小为5.7%；（3）政府干预水平是影响共同富裕的重要因素。基于上述研究结论，认为实现共同富裕过程中应高度重视并充分发挥科技创新的引领带动作用，通过产业结构升级的中介作用，实现科技创新促进共同富裕效应的最大化，同时强调要更好地发挥政府干预的调控作用。
From the perspective of science and technology innovation, the research path of "science and technology innovationindustrial structure upgrading-common prosperity" is established. The intermediary effect model is used to explore the internal relationship between science and technology innovation and common prosperity and the path mechanism of industrial structure upgrading in the process of science and technology innovation promoting common prosperity. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) the common prosperity degree of Zhejiang Province increases with the improvement of scientific and technological innovation level; (2) industrial structure upgrading in Zhejiang Province not only has a positive impact on common prosperity, but also plays an intermediary role in the process of scientific and technological innovation promoting common prosperity, showing the transmission path of "scientific and technological innovation-industrial structure upgrading-common prosperity"; The mediating effect between industrial structure upgrading and technological innovation and common prosperity is 5.7%; (3) the level of government participation is an important factor affecting common prosperity. Based on the above conclusions, it is believed that we should attach great importance to and give full play to the leading role of scientific and technological innovation in the process of achieving common prosperity, and maximize the effect of scientific and technological innovation in promoting common prosperity through the intermediary role of industrial structure upgrading. Meanwhile, it is emphasized that we should give better play to the regulatory role of government intervention.
[1] Phillips F. Toward an intellectual and theoretical foundation for 'shared prosperity'[J]. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2005, 18(6): 547-568.
[2] Pengfei N, Kamiya M, Bo L, et al. Technological innovation: A primary driver to promote global urban common prosperity[J]. China Economist, 2020, 15(3): 28-48.
[3] 陈劲. 共同富裕视野下的科技创新[J]. 中国经济评论, 2021(9): 52-54.
[4] 李春成. 科技创新助力共同富裕的路径[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021, doi: 10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2021.10.001.
[5] 陈劲, 阳镇, 张月遥. 共同富裕视野下的中国科技创新: 逻辑转向与范式创新[J]. 改革, 2022(1): 1-15.
[6] 张颖熙, 夏杰长. 科技向善赋能共同富裕: 机理、 模式与路径[J]. 河北学刊, 2022, 42(3): 115-122.
[7] 李翔, 邓峰. 科技创新、 产业结构升级与经济增长[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(3): 84-93.
[8] 赵晓男, 代茂兵, 郭正权. 科技创新与中国产业结构升级[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2019, 40(7): 61-74.
[9] 叶堂林, 毛若冲. 京津冀科技创新与产业结构升级耦合[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2019, 21(6): 68-79.
[10] 陈堂, 陈光. 科技创新对产业结构升级的空间外溢效应研究——基于省域空间面板模型的分析[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2020, 36(1): 21-31.
[11] Wu N, Liu Z K. Higher education development, technological innovation and industrial structure upgrade[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 162: 120400.
[12] Su J, Su K, Wang S. Does the digital economy promote industrial structural upgrading?—A test of mediating effects based on heterogeneous technological innovation[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(18): 10105.
[13] 黄顺春, 邓文德. 高质量发展评价指标体系研究述评[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(13): 26-29.
[14] 陈丽君, 郁建兴, 徐铱娜. 共同富裕指数模型的构建[J]. 治理研究, 2021, 37(4): 5-16, 2.
[15] 孙学涛, 于婷, 于法稳. 新型城镇化对共同富裕的影响及其作用机制——基于中国281个城市的分析[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2022, 37(2): 71-87.
[16] 刘儒, 张艺伟. 数字经济与共同富裕——基于空间门槛效应的实证研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 43(3): 90-99.
[17] 李春林, 叶芳, 王芬, 等. 浙江城市科技驱动力时空分异研究[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36(22): 145-151.
[18] 揭红兰. 科技金融、 科技创新对区域经济发展的传导路径与实证检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(1): 66-71.
[19] 李峰, 李明祥, 张宇敬. 科技创新、 产业结构升级对经济发展的实证分析[J]. 技术经济, 2021, 40(7): 1-10.
[20] 干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长与波动的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(5): 4-16, 31.
[21] 郭彬, 张笑. 金融集聚与产业结构升级耦合协调性研究[J]. 管理现代化, 2018, 38(5): 31-34.
[22] 刘志华, 徐军委, 张彩虹. 科技创新、 产业结构升级与碳排放效率——基于省际面板数据的PVAR分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(2): 508-520.
[23] 刘荣增, 何春. 数字经济促进共同富裕的机制与检验[J]. 区域经济评论, 2022(5): 37-46.
[24] 贾洪文, 张伍涛, 盘业哲. 科技创新、 产业结构升级与经济高质量发展[J].上海经济研究, 2021(5): 50-60.
[25] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173.
[26] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004(5): 614-620.
[27] MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects[J]. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83.
[28] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
