论文

中国粮食虚拟耕地资源国际贸易影响因素评价

  • 曹冲 ,
  • 谢文宝 ,
  • 袁国军
展开
  • 1. 皖西学院经济与管理学院,六安 237012
    2. 安徽省中药生态农业工程研究中心,六安 237012
曹冲,讲师,研究方向为农产品贸易,电子信箱:cao_chong19881201@126.com

收稿日期: 2022-06-05

  修回日期: 2022-10-20

  网络出版日期: 2023-04-23

基金资助

安徽省教育厅科学研究项目(2022AH51664);六安市社会科学创新发展研究课题(2022LSK40);皖西学院高层次人才科研启动资金项目(WGKQ2021076);2021年安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目(SK2021A0531)

Study on the influencing factors of international trade of grain virtual cultivated land resources in China

  • CAO Chong ,
  • XIE Wenbao ,
  • YUAN Guojun
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management , West Anhui University, Liu'an 237012, China
    2. Anhui Engineering Research Center for Eco-agriculture of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liu'an 237012, China

Received date: 2022-06-05

  Revised date: 2022-10-20

  Online published: 2023-04-23

摘要

以中国与18个粮食贸易伙伴国2002—2020年跨国面板数据为样本,采用国际贸易理论和扩展的引力模型,对影响中国粮食虚拟耕地资源国际贸易因素进行实证检验。研究结果表明:农业劳动力资源禀赋、人口规模、人均收入绝对差异(不显著)、汇率、距离、WTO对中国粮食虚拟耕地资源国际贸易有促进影响,而农业用地资源禀赋、水资源禀赋、技术水平(不显著)、农业产业规模差距、经济发展水平差异、市场价格水平、“一带一路”倡议对虚拟耕地资源流动存在负面影响。最后,针对实证检验结果得出了政策启示。

本文引用格式

曹冲 , 谢文宝 , 袁国军 . 中国粮食虚拟耕地资源国际贸易影响因素评价[J]. 科技导报, 2023 , 41(6) : 127 -137 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.06.013

Abstract

Based on the cross-border panel data of China and 18 grain trading partner countries from 2002 to 2020, the factors affecting the international trade of grain virtual cultivated land resources in China were empirically tested using international trade theory and extended gravity model. The results show that agricultural labor resource endowment, population size, absolute difference of per capita income (not significant) , exchange rate, distance and WTO have promoting effects on international trade of grain virtual cultivated land resources in China. However, agricultural land resource endowment, water resource endowment, technical level (not significant) , agricultural industry scale gap, economic development level difference, market price level and “Belt and Road”initiative have negative effects on the flow of virtual cultivated land resource. Finally, the empirical test results provide the policy implications.

参考文献

[1] Fukase E, Martin W. Who will feed China in the 21st Century? Income growth and food demand and supply in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2016, 67(1): 3-23.
[2] 陈锡文 . 落实发展新理念 破解农业新难题[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016, 37(3): 4-10.
[3] 曹冲, 陈俭, 夏咏 . 中国主要农产品贸易中隐含的虚拟耕地资源“尾效”研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(2): 72-78.
[4] Allan J A. Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible[C]//Priorities for water resources allocation and management. London: ODA, 1993: 13-26.
[5] 罗贞礼, 龙爱华, 黄璜, 等. 虚拟土战略与土地资源可持续利用的社会化管理[J]. 冰川冻土, 2004(5): 624-631.
[6] 成丽, 方天堃, 潘春玲 . 中国粮食贸易中虚拟耕地贸易的估算[J]. 中国农村经济, 2008(6): 25-31.
[7] 刘爱民, 薛莉, 成升魁, 等. 我国大宗农产品贸易格局及对外依存度研究——基于虚拟耕地资源的分析和评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 915-926.
[8] Gerbens-Leenes P W , Nonhebel S , Cleveland C J . Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 42(1): 185-199.
[9] Goedkoop M, Hofstetter P, Ruedi Müller-Wenk, et al. The ECO-indicator 98 explained[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1998, 3(6): 352-360.
[10] Wackernagel M, Silverstein J. Big things first: Focusing on the scale imperative with the ecological footprint[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 32: 391-394.
[11] Bringezu S, Schütz H, Moll S. Rationale for and interpretation of economy-wide materials flow analysis and derived indicators[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2010, 7(2): 43-64.
[12] Ali T, Huang J, Wang J, et al. Global footprints of water and land resources through China's food trade[J]. Global Food Security, 2017, 12: 139-145.
[13] Han M, Chen G. Global arable land transfers embodied in Mainland China's foreign trade[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 70: 521-534.
[14] 严志强, 颜章雄, 胡宝清, 等. 虚拟土地、虚拟土地战略与区域土地资源优化配置管理的理论探讨[J]. 广西社会科学, 2007(10): 70-74.
[15] 闫丽珍, 石敏俊, 闵庆文, 等 . 中国玉米区际贸易与区域水土资源平衡[J]. 资源科学, 2008(7): 1032-1038.
[16] 强文丽, 刘爱民, 成升魁, 等 . 中国农产品贸易的虚拟土地资源量化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(8): 1289-1297.
[17] 钱龙, 饶清玲, 曹宝明, 等 . 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家的粮食贸易及其虚拟水土资源估算[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(3): 430-440.
[18] 孙致陆, 贾小玲, 李先德. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家粮食贸易演变趋势及其虚拟耕地资源流量估算[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(1): 24-32.
[19] 孙才志, 汤玮佳, 邹玮. 中国粮食贸易中的虚拟资源生态要素估算及效应分析[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(3): 589-597.
[20] 马博虎, 张宝文 . 中国粮食对外贸易中虚拟耕地贸易量的估算与贡献分析——基于 1978—2008 年中国粮食对外贸易数据的实证分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(6): 115-119.
[21] 梁流涛, 唐林昊, 李士超, 等 . 基于生态网络架构的虚拟耕地流动格局及其稳定性评价[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(1): 140-149.
[22] 黄雨, 田明华, 隋明华. 中国农畜产品虚拟耕地流动趋势及发展战略[J]. 当代经济研究, 2017(6): 90-96.
[23] 贲培琪, 吴绍华, 李啸天, 等 . 中国省际粮食贸易及其虚拟耕地流动模拟[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(8): 1447-1456.
[24] 曹冲, 陈俭, 丁晨晨, 等 . 长江中下游地区农业经济增长中隐含虚拟耕地资源“尾效”对比研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(3): 20-26.
[25] 樊鹏飞, 梁流涛, 许明军, 等 . 基于虚拟耕地流动视角的省际耕地生态补偿研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(1): 91-101.
[26] 梁流涛, 祝孔超 . 区际农业生态补偿:区域划分与补偿标准核算——基于虚拟耕地流动视角的考察[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(8): 1932-1948.
[27] Meyfroidt P, Lambin E F, Erb K H, et al. Globalization of land use: Distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(5): 438-444.
[28] Taherzadeh O, Caro D. Drivers of water and land use embodied in international soybean trade[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 223: 83-93.
[29] Qiang W L, Niu S W, Liu A M, et al. Trends in global virtual land trade in relation to agricultural products[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020(92): 104439.
[30] 曹冲 . 我国主要农产品贸易中虚拟耕地资源流的驱动因素研究[J]. 西部经济管理论坛, 2021, 32(5): 12-22.
[31] 强文丽, 张翠玲, 刘爱民, 等 . 全球农产品贸易的虚拟耕地资源流动演变及影响因素[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(9): 1704-1714.
[32] 王琼 . 中国粮食虚拟耕地进口的测度及其影响因素——基于大豆、玉米、小麦和大米的分析[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2018,39(3): 134-139.
[33] Linnemann H. An econometric study of international trade flows[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics & Political Science/revue Canadienne De Economiques Et Science Politique, 1966, 33(1): 633-634.
[34] Leontief W. Domestic production and foreign trade[J]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1953, 97(4): 332-349.
[35] Krugman P R. Is free trade passé?[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1987, 1(2): 131-144.
[36] Kandogan Y. Intra-industry trade of transition Countries: Trends and determinants[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2003, 4(3): 273-286.
[37] Lipion M. The theory of the optimising peasant[J]. The Journal of Development Studies, 1968, 4(3): 327-351.
[38] Schluter M G G, Mount T D. Some management objectives of the peasant farmer: An analysis of risk aversion in the choice of cropping pattern, Surat district, India[J]. The Journal of Development Studies, 1976, 12(3): 246-261.
[39] Hopper W D. Allocation efficiency in a traditional Indian agriculture[J]. Journal of Farm Economics, 1965, 47(3): 611-624.
[40] 陆文聪, 叶建 . 粮食政策市场化改革与浙江农作物生产反应:价格、风险和定购[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2004(3): 6-12.
[41] 谢国娥, 张亮, 杨逢珉 . 中国与 TPP成员国农产品贸易关系及其影响因素研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 31(6): 44-55.
[42] Weinzettel J, Hertwich E G, Peters G P, et al. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013, 23(2): 433-438.
[43] Wagner B J. Export entry and exit by German firms[J]. Review of World Economics, 2001, 137(1): 105-123.
[44] Baier S L, Bergstrand J H. The growth of world trade: Tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2001, 53(1): 1-27.
[45] Novy D. Gravity redux: Measuring international trade costs with panel data[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2012, 51(1): 101-121.
[46] Tinbergen J. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestion for an international economic policy[M]. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1962.
[47] Poyhonen P. A tentative model for the flows of trade between countries[J]. Weltwirts Chaftliches Archiv, 1963, 90(1): 93-99.
[48] 刘红梅, 李国军, 王克强. 中国农业虚拟水国际贸易影响因素研究——基于引力模型的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2010(9): 76-87.
[49] 林僖. 区域服务贸易协定对服务出口的影响:机制与效应[J]. 世界经济, 2021, 44(6): 50-71.
[50] 曹冲 .“一带一路”倡议下中国与中亚五国基础设施的贸易效应研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021, 42(3): 36-45.
[51] 施炳展, 张瑞恩 . 中国省际贸易潜力估算——基于国内贸易与国际贸易对比的视角[J]. 国际贸易问题,2021(12): 49-65.
[52] 范兆斌, 张若晗. 国际移民网络与贸易二元边际: 来自中国的证据[J]. 国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2016(5): 5-16.

文章导航

/