有效治理是减少技术负面效应的重要途径，国际组织及各国从负责任创新视角探寻技术治理策略与实践路径取得一定成效，但技术治理背后的内在逻辑和特征未被明晰表达。采用探索式案例分析法，以纳米技术治理问题为例对欧盟、美国、中国已有研究成果进行分析，梳理现行负责任创新技术治理的理论框架和策略工具，比较分析欧盟、美国、中国的治理逻辑差异与共性特征。研究发现，国家政府在新兴技术治理体系中处于主导地位，国家需求是治理目标与治理策略的主要驱动力量，“平衡”各方利益相关者关系是新兴技术治理的主要手段，协同共治是新兴技术治理的行动导向。在此过程中，政府在新兴技术治理网络结构中处于核心位置，治理结构从“垂直”型向“网络”型转变，新兴技术治理理念从适应性治理策略向前瞻性治理策略演变。
The emerging technology management system is an important way to reduce negative effects of the technology. Many countries have made achievements in the research of technology governance strategy and practice in terms of of responsible innovation. However, the underlying logic behind technical governance remains unclear. This paper uses case analysis method to study the nanotechnology governance strategies and practice pathways in the United States, European Union and China. The results show that government plays a leading role in the emerging technology governance. National demand is the main driving force of governance objectives and strategies. "Balancing" the relationship between stakeholders is the main tool of governance in emerging technologies. Collaborative governance is the action orientation of emerging technology governance. The government is in the center of the emerging technology governance network structure. The governance structure evolves from "vertical" to "network" and the governance concept turns from adaptive governance to forward-looking governance.
[1] Fondazione Giannino Bassetti. Choices of science and choices of society[EB/OL]. [2022-12-20]. https://www.fon⁃dazionebassetti.org/it/focus/2003/04/scelte_della_scienza_e_scelte.html.
[2] Fondazione Giannino Bassetti. The science that generates'insecurity'[EB/OL]. [2022-12-20]. https://www. fondazionebassetti. org/it/focus/2003/04/la_scienza_che_genera_insicure.html.
[3] NNI. The national nanotechnology initiative[EB/OL]. [2022-12-20].https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/nni_strategic_plan_2007. pdf?q=NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf.
[4] Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2012, 39(6): 751-760.
[5] 梅亮 . 责任式创新: 科技进步与发展永续的选择[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2018: 11-12.
[6] Schroeder D, Brown D S, Schrempf B, et al. Responsible, inclusive innovation and the Nano-Divide[J]. Nanoethics, 2016, 10(2): 177-188.
[7] 吕阳, 王健 . 基于负责任创新理念的胚胎植入前遗传学检测技术的伦理治理研究[J]. 医学与社会, 2022, 35(2): 129-134.
[8] 马诗雯, 王国豫 . 合成生物学的“负责任创新”[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(6): 751-762.
[9] 杨青峰, 任锦鸾 . 发展负责任的数字经济[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(7): 823-834.
[10] 廖苗, 高璐, 胡明艳, 等 . 从负责任创新到开放科学——雷内·冯·尚伯格访谈录[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 35(3): 14-27.
[11] 晏萍, 张卫, 王前 .“负责任创新”的理论与实践述评[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2014, 31(2): 84-90.
[12] 刘战雄, 夏保华 . 责任过度及其对负责任创新的启示[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2016, 32(7): 41-46.
[13] Stahl B C. Responsible research and innovation: Therole of privacy in an emerging framework[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2013, 40(6): 708-716.
[14] Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(91): 75-78.
[15] Owen R, Stilgoe J, Macnaghten P, et al. A Framework for Responsible Innovation[C]//Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Wiley, 2013.
[16] Lindblom C E. The science of "muddling through"[J]. Public Administration Review, 1959, 19(2): 79-88.
[17] Bos J J, Brown R R. Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012, 79(7): 1340-1353.
[18] Voss J P, Bauknecht D, Kemp R. Reflexive governance for sustainable development[M]. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006: 23-36.
[19] 杨素雪, 孙启贵 . 新兴技术的预期治理: 内涵、意义与过程[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(23): 47-53.
[20] 蔡晶晶, 毛寿龙 . 复杂“社会-生态系统”的适应性治理: 扩展集体林权制度改革的视野[J]. 农业经济问题, 2011, 32(6): 82-112.
[21] 黄斐 . 挑战不确定性: 实验主义治理的逻辑与实践—— 评 Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture[J]. 公共管理评论, 2016(1): 162-168.
[22] Charles F, Zeitlin J. Experimentalist governance in the european union: Toward a New Architecture[M]. Oxford: Oxford Press, 2010: 3-4.
[23] Abbott F M. Distributed governance at the WTO-WIPO: An evolving model for open-architecture integrated governance[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2000, 3(1): 63-81.
[24] Wiek A, Lang D J, Siegrist M, et al. Qualitative system analysis as a means for sustainable governance of emerging technologies: The case of nanotechnology[J]. Science Direct, 2006, 16(2): 988-999.
[25] Wiek A, Binder C. Solution spaces for decision-making a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2005, 25(6): 589-608.
[26] Sheona A K, Gary S, Hilary R, et al. Foresight study on the risk governance of new technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology[J]. Risk Analysis, 2016, 36(5): 1006-1024.
[27] 苏敬勤, 李召敏 . 案例研究方法的运用模式及其关键指标[J]. 管理学报, 2011, 8(3): 340-347.
[28] 罗伯特·K. 殷 . 案例研究: 设计与方法[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2017: 142.
[29] 樊春良, 李玲 . 中国纳米技术的治理探析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(8): 51-60.
[30] 罗纳德·伯特 . 结构洞: 竞争的社会结构[M]. 上海: 格致出版社, 2017: 18.
[31] 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006—2020 年)[EB/OL]. [2022-12-20]. http://www. gov. cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm.
