专题:康复医学的时代发展与中国策略

射频消融技术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的康复评定及预后分析

  • 李健 ,
  • 路鹏飞
展开
  • 1. 中国航天科工集团七三一医院骨科,北京 100074
    2. 重庆市长寿区人民医院骨科,重庆 401220
李健,副主任医师,研究方向为脊柱内镜手术技术,电子信箱:13501091665@139.com

收稿日期: 2023-01-17

  修回日期: 2023-07-25

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-21

Rehabilitation evaluation and prognosis analysis of radiofrequency ablation technology for the elderly patients with lumbar disc herniation

  • LI Jian ,
  • LU Pengfei
Expand
  • 1. Department of Orthopaedics, China Aerospace Science & Industry Corporation Hospital 731, Beijing 100074, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Changshou Chongqing, Chongqing 401220, China

Received date: 2023-01-17

  Revised date: 2023-07-25

  Online published: 2023-12-21

摘要

老年腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者的手术策略须兼顾安全性、功能康复及预后情况。以经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)和椎间孔镜射频消融术(RF)后的单纯性LDH老年患者为研究对象,通过比较2种微创技术的安全性、术后功能康复与预后质量,旨在评价椎间孔镜RF对老年LDH患者的术后康复和预后的价值与优势。采用围手术期指标来评估手术安全性,采用术后1年时的腰椎活动受限率、腰痛(LBP)复发率作为功能康复指标,采用术后1年时的疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、LDH 相关症状的日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、生活质量的Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)作为预后指标。结果显示,RF组围手术期并发症发生率、康复期间的腰椎活动受限率、预后ODI评分均显著低于MIS-TLIF组,而2组的LBP复发率、VAS评分、JOA评分无显著差异,说明椎间孔镜RF治疗老年单纯性LDH具有降低围手术期并发症、促进术后康复、提高预后生活质量的优势。

本文引用格式

李健 , 路鹏飞 . 射频消融技术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的康复评定及预后分析[J]. 科技导报, 2023 , 41(23) : 49 -55 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.23.007

Abstract

Surgical strategy should be planned with a balance of safety, functional recovery, and prognosis for the elderly patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This study compares two minimal-invasive techniques for treating elderly LDH patients, i. e., the minimal-invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and spinal endoscopy radiofrequency ablation (RF) in terms of safety, postoperative functional recovery, and prognosis quality, aiming to evaluate the application value of RF in postoperative rehabilitation and functional prognosis for elderly patients. The peri-operative parameters are used as the safety indicators, the rates of limited lumbar range of motion, recurring low back pain (LBP) at postoperative 1y are used to evaluate the rehabilitation level, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for the LDH related symptoms, as well as the Oswestry disability index (ODI) for quality of life are used as the prognosis indicators. The results show that the rate of perioperative complication, rate of limited lumbar range of motion, and prognostic ODI in the RF group are significantly lower than those in the MIS-TLIF group, while there are no significant differences in the rate of recurring LBP, VAS, and JOA score between the two groups. It indicates that the RF has the advantages of reducing perioperative complications, promoting postoperative recovery, and improving the prognostic quality of life for treating elderly patients with simple LDH.

参考文献

[1] Huang Y, Chen J, Gao P, et al. A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2021, 22(1): 156.
[2] Wan S, Xue B, Xiong Y. Three-dimensional biomechanical finite element analysis of lumbar disc herniation in middle aged and elderly[J]. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, 2022: 7107702.
[3] Wang S, Wang L, Wang Y, et al. Biomechanical analysis of combining head-down tilt traction with vibration for different grades of degeneration of the lumbar spine[J]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2017, 39: 83-93.
[4] Han Q, Meng F, Chen M, et al. Comparison between pe-tlif and mis-tlif in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Pain Research, 2022, 15: 1271-1282.
[5] Dower A, Davies M A, Ghahreman A. Pathologic basis of lumbar radicular pain[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2019, 128: 114-121.
[6] Neil B, Elizabeth Y, Tyler K, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)[J]. Clinical Spine Surgery, 2020, 33(2): 62-64.
[7] Chen Y C, Zhang L, Li E N, et al. An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparing minimally invasive with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(43): e17420.
[8] Ren W, Chen Y, Xiang L. Minimally invasive surgical techniques for the therapy of far lateral disc herniation in middle-aged and elderly patients[J]. Computer Assisted Surgery, 2019, 24(Suppl 1): 13-19.
[9] Yang L H, Liu W, Li J, et al. Lumbar decompression and lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(27): e20323.
[10] Pfirrmann C W, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration[J]. Spine, 2001, 26(17): 1873-1878.
[11] Yi D, Baoge L, Hui Q, et al. Can knee flexion contracture affect cervical alignment and neck tension? A prospective self-controlled pilot study[J]. The Spine Journal, 2020, 20(2): 251-260.
[12] Tsou P M, Yeung C A, Yeung A T. Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: A minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure[J]. The Spine Journal, 2004, 4(5): 564-573.
[13] Wang M, Zhang X, Yu Y, et al. Low-dose collagenase chemonucleolysis combined with radiofrequency in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A 10-year retrospective study[J]. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2021, 2021: 8234558.
[14] Chen Q, Zhang Z, Liu B, et al. Evaluation of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study[J]. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2021, 13(2): 599-607.
[15] Davis T C, Hoover K W, Keller S, et al. Mississippi diabetes telehealth network: A collaborative approach to chronic care management[J]. Telemedicine and e-Health, 2020, 26(2): 184-189.
[16] Brinjikji W, Luetmer P H, Comstock B, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations[J]. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2015, 36(4): 811-816.
[17] Min Y, Xu P. Curative effects of remote home management combined with feng's spinal manipulation on the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, 2022: 1420392.
[18] Wang J C, Dailey A T, Mummaneni P V, et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: Lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy[J]. Journal of Neurosurgery, 2014, 21(1): 48-53.
[19] Martin B I, Mirza S K, Spina N, et al. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States, 2004-2015[J]. Spine, 2019, 44(5): 369-376.
[20] Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2019, 394(10204): 1145-1158.
[21] Adogwa O, Elsamadicy A A, Fialkoff J D, et al. Early ambulation decreases length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and improves functional outcomes in elderly patients undergoing surgery for correction of adult degenerative scoliosis[J]. Spine, 2017, 42(18): 1420-1425.
[22] Brusko G D, Kolcun J P G, Heger J A, et al. Reductions in length of stay, narcotics use, and pain following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for 1- to 3-level lumbar fusion surgery[J]. Neurosurgical Focus, 2019, 46(4): E4.
[23] Zakaria H M, Bazydlo M, Schultz L, et al. Ambulation on postoperative day #0 is associated with decreased morbidity and adverse events after elective lumbar spine surgery: Analysis from the Michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC)[J]. Neurosurgery, 2020, 87(2): 320-328.
文章导航

/