专题:康复医学的时代发展与中国策略

后交叉韧带撕脱骨折行关节镜下缝合桥固定术的康复评定及预后分析

  • 杨树龙 ,
  • 任向宇 ,
  • 刘哲 ,
  • 王天达 ,
  • 张腾 ,
  • 李昊鑫 ,
  • 齐岩松 ,
  • 张忠
展开
  • 1. 乌海市人民医院运动医学科,乌海 016000
    2. 内蒙古自治区人民医院骨科中心,呼和浩特 010017
    3.“中华医学会医师培训工程—中华运动康复医学培训工程”内蒙古培训中心,呼和浩特 010017
杨树龙,副主任医师,研究方向为关节外科手术技术,电子信箱:yangshulong2008@163.com

收稿日期: 2023-02-14

  修回日期: 2023-07-19

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-21

基金资助

内蒙古自治区科技创新引导项目;国家自然科学基金面上项目(81960399)

Rehabilitation evaluation and prognostic analysis of arthroscopic suture bridge fixation for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures

  • YANG Shulong ,
  • REN Xiangyu ,
  • LIU Zhe ,
  • WANG Tianda ,
  • ZHANG Teng ,
  • LI Haoxin ,
  • QI Yansong ,
  • ZHANG Zhong
Expand
  • 1. Department of Sports Medicine, Wuhai People's Hospital, Wuhai 016000, China
    2. Orthopedic Center, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China
    3. "Doctor Training Project of Chinese Medical Association—Chinese Exercise Rehabilitation Medical Education" Inner Mongolia Training Center, Hohhot 010017, China

Received date: 2023-02-14

  Revised date: 2023-07-19

  Online published: 2023-12-21

摘要

后交叉韧带撕脱骨折(PCLAF)的术后康复期易发生膝关节不稳定、活动受限等并发症,预后不佳,关节镜下双排锚钉缝合桥固定术是治疗PCLAF的新型技术。以PCLAF患者为对象,旨在明确急性期行双排锚钉缝合桥PCLAF固定术的安全性、疗效及功能预后。利用后抽屉试验(PDT)、后移距离评估膝关节后向稳定性,检测膝关节活动度(ROM),采用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分及重返运动率评价患者的预后。康复评定结果显示,术后3个月CT示骨质愈合良好,术后1年与1.5年的PDT阳性率、后移程度、ROM、Lysholm、IKDC评分较术前均恢复良好,且未见差异,但术后1.5年的重返运动率显著高于术后1年。说明PCLAF患者在急性期行关节镜下双排锚钉缝合桥手术的骨质愈合好,康复进展顺利,术后1年即可恢复膝关节功能,预后佳,术后1.5年时76.5%的患者已重返体育运动。

本文引用格式

杨树龙 , 任向宇 , 刘哲 , 王天达 , 张腾 , 李昊鑫 , 齐岩松 , 张忠 . 后交叉韧带撕脱骨折行关节镜下缝合桥固定术的康复评定及预后分析[J]. 科技导报, 2023 , 41(23) : 64 -71 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.23.009

Abstract

Postoperative complications, such as knee instability and limited range of motion (ROM), always happen during the rehabilitation period of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture (PCLAF), making poor prognosis. Arthroscopic double row anchor suture bridge fixation is a new technology for PCLAF. This study aims to clarify the safety, efficacy, and functional prognosis of suture bridge fixation for treating acute PCLAF. The posterior drawer test (PDT) and posterior displacement distance were performed and measured to evaluate the stability of the knee joint, with other parameters including knee ROM, as well as IKDC, Lysholm scores, and rate of returning to sports for evaluating the prognosis. The results showed that the bone healing process was good at 3 months after surgery and the positive rate of PDT, degree of displacement, ROM, Lysholm, and IKDC scores were recovered well at both 1 and 1.5 years after surgery, without intergroup difference. However, the rate of returning to sports at 1.5 years after surgery was significantly higher than the rate at 1 year after surgery. The present study indicates that acute PCLAF patients can obtain good bone healing progress and smooth post-operative rehabilitation by arthroscopic suture bridge fixation, and that the joint function can be restored within 1 year after surgery and 76.5% of the patients can return to physical exercise in 1.5 years, suggesting a good prognosis.

参考文献

[1] 齐勇, 王韵廷, 黎飞猛, 等. 改良膝关节后侧入路治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2017, 23(3): 273-275.
[2] 马武秀, 辛庆峰, 郑国海, 等. 双排可吸收锚钉桥式缝合固定后交叉韧带止点骨折疗效分析[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(2): 178-181.
[3] Zhang X, Cai G, Xu J, et al. A minimally invasive postero-medial approach with suture anchors for isolated tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament[J]. Knee, 2013, 20(2): 96-99.
[4] Sabat D, Jain A, Kumar V. Displaced posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures: A retrospective comparative study between open posterior approach and arthroscopic single-tunnel suture fixation[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(1): 44-53.
[5] Hooper P O, Silko C, Malcolm T L, et al. Management of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion injuries: A systematic review[J]. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2017, 46(3): 734-742.
[6] Domnick C, Kösters C, Franke F, et al. Biomechanical properties of different fixation techniques for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures-sciencedirect[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(6): 1065-1071.
[7] 吴市春, 徐伟华, 林文祥, 等. 关节镜下缝线桥技术与常规双隧道缝线技术治疗后交叉韧带止点撕脱骨折的早期疗效比较[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2021, 35(7): 829-835.
[8] Deng W, Li Y, Wu S, et al. Surgical treatment of posteri⁃or cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures using a locking compression hook plate: A case series[J]. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 2020, 54(6): 623-626.
[9] Madi S S, Pandey V, Reddy B, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes following arthroscopic dual tibial tunnel double sutures knot-bump fixation technique for acute displaced posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures[J]. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2021, 9(1): 50-57.
[10] Ranger P, Renaud A, Phan P, et al. Evaluation of reconstructive surgery using artificial ligaments in 71 acute knee dislocations[J]. International Orthopaedics, 2011, 35(10): 1477-1482.
[11] Yi D, Baoge L, Hui Q, et al. Can knee flexion contracture affect cervical alignment and neck tension? A prospective self-controlled pilot study[J]. The Spine Journal, 2020, 20(2): 251-260.
[12] Insall J. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system[J]. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 1989, 11(248): 13-14.
[13] Su M, Jia X, Zhang Z, et al. Medium-term (least 5 years) comparative outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 4SHG, allograft, and LARS ligament[J]. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2021, 31(2): e101-e110.
[14] Fu S N, Chan Y H. Translation and validation of Chinese version of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form[J]. Disability & Rehabilitation, 2011, 33(13/14): 1186-1189.
[15] Wang W, Liu L, Chang X, et al. Cross-cultural translation of the Lysholm knee score in Chinese and its validation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2016, 17(1): 436.
[16] Yuanliang D, Haifeng D, Zhihui W, et al. A case report of traumatic osteoarthritis associated with LARS artificial ligament use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2021, 21(1): 745.
[17] Nourbakhsh S T, Bahramian F, Zafarani Z, et al. Arthroscopic bridge technique for PCL Avulsion: Surgical technique and key points[J]. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2016, 4(4): 393-395.
[18] Boutsiadis A, Karataglis D, Agathangelidis F, et al. Arthroscopic 4-point suture fixation of anterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures[J]. Arthroscopy Techniques, 2014, 3(6): e683-e687.
[19] Camara-Arrigunaga F, Camposeco-Longo P, Nieves-Silva J, et al. Fixation with anchors for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion by arthroscopy: A new technique[J]. Arthroscopy, 2005, 21(9): e1141-e1143.
[20] Joshi S, Bhatia C, Gondane A, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of isolated posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures: Clinical and functional outcome[J]. Knee Surgery and Related Research, 2017, 29(3): 216-222.
[21] Willinger L, Lacheta L, Deimmling C V, et al. Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament-a biomechanical comparison[J]. The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019, 7(6_suppl4): 2325967119S0022.
[22] Sawyer G A, Anderson B C, Paller D, et al. Biomechanical analysis of suture bridge fixation for tibial eminence fractures[J]. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28(10): 1533-1539.
[23] 邓辉云, 郑佳鹏, 吴清泉, 等 . 锚钉缝线桥技术避骨骺内固定治疗青少年 PCL 胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(5): 467-470.
[24] 胡勇, 谭海涛 . 关节镜下双排锚钉交叉缝线固定术治疗前交叉韧带止点撕脱性骨折效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2018, 58(4): 60-62.
[25] Lee K W, Yang D S, Lee G S, et al. Suture bridge fixation technique for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture[J]. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2015, 7(4): 505-508.
[26] 隋晓辉. 切开复位内、外排锚钉固定与空心螺钉固定治疗后交叉韧带撕脱骨折临床效果分析[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2020, 48(2): 183-184.
文章导航

/