从美国面临的发展形势、关键和新兴技术的确定过程、战略内容和努力方向等方面分析了《美国政府关键和新兴技术国家标准战略》发布的背景和主要内容,探讨了美国政府关键和新兴技术标准战略的基本路径和未来标准趋势,主要包括4个方向:美国将继续增加在基础研究和应用研究方面的支出,增加关键技术和新兴技术对国际标准的贡献;继续维持私营部门主导的标准体系,并确保政府在该体系中扮演积极而适当的角色;高度重视关键技术和新兴技术标准化专业人员的培养,促进利益相关者广泛参与标准制定组织;加强诽谤中国破坏国际标准制定过程、联合其他国家抵制和打击中国的国际标准制定活动。分析了该战略对技术竞争、标准国际化环境和标准情报保护等方面的影响,并提出了中国标准化发展的对策建议。
This paper focuses on the future trend of the“United States government national standards strategy for critical and emerging technology”, its impact on China, and the countermeasures and suggestions, in order to provide useful reference for China's standardization development. First of all, this paper draws out the research object and the theme from the important role of standards, the situation of national standards strategy, and the status quo of national standards strategy research in the United States. Secondly, the background and main contents of the release of the strategy are deeply analyzed from the aspects of the development situation faced by the United States, the determination process of critical and emerging technologies, as well as the strategic content and direction of efforts, and the basic path and future standard trend of the United States' critical and emerging technology standard strategy are clarified, which mainly includes four directions: continuing to increase spending on basic and applied research and increasing the contribution of critical and emerging technologies to international standards; continuing to maintain the private sector-led standards system and ensuring that the government plays an active but appropriate role in the system; attaching great importance to the training of standardization professionals in critical and emerging technologies and promoting the broad participation of stakeholders in standard-developing organizations in critical and emerging technologies; strengthening the slander of China to undermine the international standard-setting process, and uniting with other countries to boycott and crack down on China's international standard-setting activities. On this basis, the impact of the strategy on China's technology decoupling, standard internationalization environment and standard intelligence protection is analyzed. Accordingly, the paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for China's standardization development from the aspects of concentrating resources to break through the standard development in the key subdivision technology field, continuously optimizing China's international standardization strategy, and effectively coping with the U.S. denigration of China.
[1] 田艳宇.美国国家标准战略[J].中国科技奖励, 2003(2):74-80.
[2] 田艳宇.美国国家标准战略(续)[J].中国科技奖励, 2003(3):76-82.
[3] 孙忠明,李玉光,刘永勤. 2005年美国标准战略草案解读[J].冶金标准化与质量, 2005, 43(5):25-31.
[4] 唐良富,解如风,张慕,等.标准供给侧改革和创新参考——以美国标准战略2015版与美国标准战略2010比较为例[C]//中国标准化协会.标准化助力供给侧结构性改革与创新——第十三届中国标准化论坛.济南:《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》电子杂志社, 2016:249-258.
[5] American National Standards Institute. United States standards strategy (USSS)-2015[EB/OL].(2023-05-05)[2023-08-10]. https://www.ansi.org/search#q=united%20states%20standards%20strategy&sort=relevancy.
[6] 陈俊华,胡关子,赵文慧. 2020版美国标准战略变化研究[J].标准科学, 2021(3):24-29.
[7] American National Standards Institute. United States standards strategy (USSS)-2020[EB/OL].(2021-01-06)[2023-8-10]. https://share.ansi.org/Shared%20Documents/Standards%20Activities/NSSC/USSS-2020/USSS-2020-Edition.
[8] Cory N. America's national security concerns over China shouldn't imperil its leadership in technical standards development[EB/OL].(2023-01-20)[2023-1-20]. https://itif.org/publications/2023/01/20/americas-national-securityconcerns-over-china-shouldnt-imperil-its-leadershipin-technical-standards-development.
[9] Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. What Washington gets wrong about China and technical standards[EB/OL].(2023-02-27)[2023-02-27]. https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/02/27/what-washington-gets-wrong-ab out-china-and-technical-standards-pub-89110.