针对应用研究类国家科技项目定位于解决产业共性关键技术，且其主要产出的科技成果是技术发明的特点，从技术特征的视角设计了专利产出的表征方式，通过聚类分析方法识别相关的技术领域，通过知识图谱的方法设计了专利技术领域的对标计量分析模型。针对科技项目绩效考评的重点是产出、效果和影响3个维度，从专利产出数、有效发明数、产出模式、实施许可、被引次数、科学关联度、同族专利数量、Top10% 高被引专利、技术影响力指数、代表性专利等角度设计了相关指标体系，并以国家科技项目“水专项”为例，从产出、效果和影响3个维度，以国内水平和国际水平为比较对象，进行了对标计量分析。研究发现，经过多年的技术积累和升级，“水专项”的技术影响力显著提升，到了“十二五”和“十三五”时期，已经远远超过国际和国内的技术影响力指数。同时，全面覆盖水方面相关研究的7个技术领域，其中，水净化仪器、装备技术领域是主要由“水专项”资助技术专利形成的特色性领域。
In China applied research National S&T Funds are designed to solve key techniques for industries so as to achieve technical inventions. This paper designs a representational framework to characterize the patent output, which can be used to identify relevant technical fields through cluster analysis and construct a benchmarkingometric model to compare performances. The performance evaluation of S&T Funds focuses on the three dimensions: output, effect and influence. A relevant indicator system is also designed, including patent outputs, effective inventions, output mode, implementation license, cited times, science linkage, patent family, top 10% highly cited patents, technology influence index, representative patents, etc. Taking "water special project" as an example, the paper compares output, effect and influence from the three dimensions at domestic and international levels. It is found that the technical influence of "water special project" has been significantly improved. During the 12th Five-Year Plan period and 13th Five-Year Plan period, it far exceeded the international and domestic technical influence indexes. At the same time, it comprehensively covered 7 related technical fields, among which the technical field of water purification instruments and equipment was a characteristic field formed by related technical patent achievements under the special water project.
[1] Gao J, Ding K, Teng L, et al. Hybrid documents co-citation analysis: Making sense of the interaction between science and technology in technology diffusion[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 93(2): 459-471.[1] Gao J, Ding K, Teng L, et al. Hybrid documents co-citation analysis: Making sense of the interaction between science and technology in technology diffusion[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 93(2): 459-471.
[2] Corsini A, Pezzoni M. Does grant funding foster research impact? Evidence from France[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2023, 17(4): 1014484.
[3] 马瑞敏, 刘志芳, 吕宇涵, 等. 基于引用评论加权的论文代表作遴选研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(3): 279-288.
[4] 杨浩森. 基于数据包络分析的科研项目绩效评价研究: 以宁夏中央引导地方科技发展资金项目为例[J]. 企业科技与发展, 2023(3): 14-17.
[5] 刘晴, 殷群, 陈正荣, 等. 基于因子分析和TOPSIS法的科研项目结题质量评价[J]. 中华医学科研管理杂志, 2021, 34(6): 422-426.
[6] 王忠, 文宇峰, 孙玉芳, 等. 创新质量和贡献导向下科研项目绩效评价体系研究[J]. 管理科学, 2021, 34(1): 28-37.
[7] 蔡俊雄, 龚启慧, 罗枫. 基于层次分析法的科研项目绩效评价体系研究[J]. 生产力研究, 2020(10): 99-104.
[8] 贺佳欢. 文本挖掘和模糊AHP在科研项目绩效评价中的研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.
[9] Lee M, Su W. Search for the developing trends by patent analysis: A case study of lithium-ion battery electrolytes [J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(3): 952.
[10] Xu G, Dong F, Feng J. Mapping the technological landscape of emerging industry value chain through a patent lens: An integrated framework with deep learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2022, 69(6): 3367-3378.
[11] Li X, Xie Q, Huang L. Identifying the development trends of emerging technologies using patent analysis and web news data mining: The case of perovskite solar cell technology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2022, 69(6): 2603-2618.
[12] Lin W, Liu X, Xiao R. Data-driven product functional configuration: Patent data and hypergraph[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 35(1): 57.
[13] 沈君, 高继平, 滕立. 德温特手工代码共现法:一种实用的专利地图法[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2012, 33(1): 12-16.
[14] 廖花林, 文庭孝. 国内外专利法律信息挖掘研究综述[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2021, 41(2): 28-35.
[15] 江志鹏, 樊霞, 朱桂龙, 等. 技术势差对企业技术能力影响的长短期效应: 基于企业产学研联合专利的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(1): 131-139.
[16] Fukuzawa N, Ida T. Science linkages between scientific articles and patents for leading scientists in the life and medical sciences field: The case of Japan[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(2): 629-644.
[17] Sung H, Wang C, Huang M, et al. Measuring sciencebased science linkage and non-science-based linkage of patents through non-patent references[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(3): 488-498.
[18] Li R, Chambers T, Ding Y, et al. Patent citation analysis: Calculating science linkage based on citing motivation[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(5): 1007-1017.
[19] Narin F, Hamilton K S, Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science[J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(3): 317-330.
[20] Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M. Science cited in patents: A geographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2): 241-263.
[21] 高继平. 论文专利互引下的科学和技术之间的联系研究[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2023.
[22] 高继平, 赵婧. 基础研究对高技术企业技术发展的影响研究: 基于企业发明专利引用论文视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(11): 87-96.
[23] Nakamura H, Suzuki S, Kajikawa Y, et al. The effect of patent family information in patent citation network analysis: A comparative case study in the drivetrain domain [J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(2): 437-452.
[24] Dechezlepretre A, Meniere Y, Mohnen M. International patent families: From application strategies to statistical indicators[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(2): 793-828.
[25] Zhou H, Lin J. Impacts of codified knowledge index on the allocation of overseas inventors by emerging countries: Evidence from PCT patent activities in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128(2): 877-899.
[26] Bakker J, Verhoeven D, Zhang L, et al. Patent citation indicators: One size fits all? [J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(1): 187-211.
[27] 谢彩霞, 栾春娟, 赵亮. 斯坦福大学技术创新影响力及优势的专利计量研究[J]. 科学与管理, 2019, 39(3): 8-15.
[28] 石书德. 从主要专利质量指标看我国专利的发展水平[J]. 科技和产业, 2012, 12(7): 123-126.
[29] 陈默. 上向流微膨胀生物活性炭工艺微生物特性研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2012.
[30] 韩立能. 微膨胀上向流生物活性炭工艺特性及应用研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2013.
