TPB 框架下科技人才创新意愿的驱动路径研究—基于fsQCA 分析
收稿日期: 2023-06-30
修回日期: 2023-12-03
网络出版日期: 2024-10-31
基金资助
国家社会科学基金重大项目（23&ZD053）；
辽宁省社会科学基金一般项目（L21BGL044）；
中国人才研究会项目（ZRH-2131）；
辽宁省教育厅项目（JYTMS20230286）
A Study on the Driving Path of Scientific and Technological Talents'Innovation Willingness under the TPB Framework—Based on fsQCA analysis#br#
Received date: 2023-06-30
Revised date: 2023-12-03
Online published: 2024-10-31
李作学, 赵媛媛, 曹依霏, 贾建锋 . TPB 框架下科技人才创新意愿的驱动路径研究—基于fsQCA 分析[J]. 科技导报, 0 : 1 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.06.00880
Technological talents are the core element for achieving self-reliance and self-improvement in China's science and technology, and innovation willingness is the key to stimulating the vitality of technological talents. This article takes 236
scientific and technological talents as the survey subjects, adopts the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method, and explores the configuration path of multi factor synergy affecting the innovation willingness of scientific and technological talents under the TPB framework. Research has found that there are four driving types of high innovation willingness among technology talents, namely demonstrative norms innovation attitude driven, directive norms innovation attitude driven, endogenous attitudes subjective norm driven, and innovation attitude driven. Innovation attitude is an important condition for technology talents to generate innovation willingness; Directive norms and demonstrative norms are key elements in regulating the innovation willingness of scientific and technological talents, and there is a substitution relationship between the two; The perceived behavioral control of technology talents has a weaker effect on enhancing innovation willingness. This article reveals the complex causal mechanism of the synergistic effect of planned behavior theory elements on the innovation willingness of scientific and technological talents from a configuration perspective, providing important reference for organizations to cultivate the innovation willingness of scientific and technological talents.
[1] 杨媛棋, 杨一帆, 寇明婷 . 科技金融支持国家创新体系整体效能提升研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(03): 10-18.
[2] Armitage C J, Conner M. Efficacy of the theor planned behavior: A meta-analytic review[J]. Brjournal Social Psychology, 2001, 40(4): 471-499.
[3] 伍紫君, 翟育明, 王震, 等 . 心理契约、员工知识共享意愿与创新绩效：基于技术融合模式的调节效应[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2018, 25(4): 59-71.
[4] 王春玲, 刘建准 . 知识型员工创新行为激励策略研究：员工沟通意愿的调节作用[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 19(增刊2) : 119-121.
[5] 赵卓嘉 . 面子对研发人员创新意愿的影响：个体与集体面子的不同作用[J]. 财经论丛, 2017(2) : 95-103.
[6] 彭小宝, 张佳, 刘国芳, 等. 制度压力与中小企业双元性创新意愿：领导力风格的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策,2018, 35(16) : 83-90.
[7] 辛本禄, 代佳琳 . 组织创新氛围对员工创新意愿的作用机制——以知识密集型服务企业为样本[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(9): 109-116.
[8] 易华. 创业导向有助于激发员工创新行为吗——创新意愿的中介作用[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2018, 39 (1): 134-139.
[9] 刘德文, 高维和 . 顾客参与对员工创新意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16 (1): 96-103.
[10] 宝贡敏, 蔡丽玲 . 同级评价对个体创新意愿影响的实验研究[J]. 软科学, 2012, 26(10) : 86-88, 112.
[11] Wicker A W. Attitudes versus Actions: The relationshipof verbal and overt behavioralresponses to attitude objects[J]. The Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25（4）: 41-78.
[12] Ryan M, Deci L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, andwellbeing[J]. American Psychologist, 2000, 55（11）: 70-73.
[13] Schifter D E, Ajzen I. Intention, perceived control, andweight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1985, 49(3): 843.
[14] 桂婷炜, 杜建国, 姜琼琼. 新生代民营企业家的创新意愿影响因素研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(20): 24-29.
[15] Endratno H. The effect of self-confidence and subjectivenorm on students' entrepreneurial intention[C]. Proceedings of The 5th International Conference on CommunityDevelopment.2018, 231: 348-350.
[16] 陈丽君, 胡晓慧 . 政策感知､组织创新氛围与人才创新绩效——人才自我创新期待的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(3): 142-151.
[17] 刘业鑫, 吴伟伟, 于渤. 技术管理能力对突破性技术创新行为的影响：并行多重中介机制[J]. 管理科学, 2022,35(1): 67-78.
[18] Phan P H, Wong P K, Wang C. Antecedents to entrepreneurship among university students in singapore: Beliefs, attitudes and background[J]. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2002, 10 (2): 151-174.
[19] Cialdini R B, Kallgren C A, Reno R. A focus theory ofnormative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1991, 21: 201 –234.
[20] 赵斌, 栾虹, 李新建, 等 . 科技人员创新行为产生机理研究——基于计划行为理论[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(2): 286-297.
[21] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50:179-217.
[22] Ajzen I. Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives[J]. Personalityand Social Psychology Review, 2002, 6: 107-122.
[23] Ragin C. Redisigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond[J]. Social Forces, 2010, 88(4): 1936-1938.
[24] 杜运周, 贾良定 . 组态视角与定性比较分析（QCA）: 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017, (6): 155-167.
[25] Amabile T M, Hill K G, Hennessey B A, et al. The workpreference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations[J]. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 1994, 66(5), 950-967.
[26] Taylor S, Todd P A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research[J]. 1995, 6(4): 144-176.
[27] Bandura A. Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Psychological Review, 1997(84):191-951.
[28] 王雪梅 . 创新型科技人才分类评价方法[J]. 科技导报,2021, 39 (21): 72-79.
[29] 里豪克斯 拉金 . QCA 设计原理与应用：超越定性与定量研究的新方法[M]. 杜运周, 李永发, 译 . 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017: 1-5.
[30] 张驰, 郑晓杰, 王凤彬. 定性比较分析法在管理学构型研究中的应用：述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017,39(4): 68-83.
[31] Fiss P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approachto typologies in organization resear[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2): 393-420.
[32] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用：定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
[33] Bulut C, Gencturk S, Aydin E, et al. The relationshipbetween employee attitudes and innovation types: Amangerial perspective[J]. Polish Journal of ManagementStudies, 2019, 19(2): 89-100.
[34] 柯江林, 丁群 . 创业型领导对初创企业员工态度与创新绩效的影响——职场精神力的中介效应与领导-成员交换的调节作用[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2020, 41(1):91-103.
[35] 王德才, 赵曙明 . 人力资源管理实践与员工态度关系研究——基于珠三角 192家民营中小高科技企业的问卷调查[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2013, (3): 54-62.
[36] 李作学 .中国人力资源管理研究知识图谱[M]. 长春:吉林大学出版社, 2021.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
