迈向人机共生时代:人机协同决策的心理学视角
朱奥,博士研究生,研究方向为人机协同决策,电子信箱:za20@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn |
收稿日期: 2023-09-05
网络出版日期: 2025-03-07
基金资助
教育部高等学校心理学类专业教指委教改项目(20222008)
清华大学教学改革项目(DX05-02)
版权
Towards the era of human-machine symbiosis: A psychological perspective on human-machine collaborative decision-making
Received date: 2023-09-05
Online published: 2025-03-07
Copyright
在人工智能技术的驱动下,人机协同决策效能逐步提升,展现出巨大的潜力。然而,当前人机协同决策领域面临情感问题、信任问题、决策权力分配问题和道德对齐问题等挑战。其中,人机协同情感问题涉及机器如何克服人机异质性、准确识别人类的情感状态并做出适当响应;信任问题关系到人类对机器决策的依赖程度和信任水平,需要在过度信任和信任不足之间找到平衡;决策权力分配问题则聚焦于在人机协作中如何合理分配决策权,以防止机器权力过大或不足;道德对齐问题探讨如何确保机器决策符合人类的道德标准和价值观,保障决策的伦理性和社会接受度。提出了人机协同决策的未来发展方向,包括提升机器对人类情感的理解和响应能力、建立稳固的信任机制、优化决策权力的分配方式,以及确保机器决策符合伦理和道德标准。在迈向人机共生的道路上,不仅需要技术创新,还需要结合心理学视角来应对这些挑战,以实现更加高效、安全和可持续的人机协同决策。
朱奥 , 刘华硕 , 袁佩君 , 张丹 . 迈向人机共生时代:人机协同决策的心理学视角[J]. 科技导报, 2025 , 43(3) : 37 -46 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.09.01354
1 |
黄海丰, 刘培森, 李擎, 等. 协作机器人智能控制与人机交互研究综述[J]. 工程科学学报, 2022, 44 (4): 780- 791.
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
Openai. Gpt-4 technical report[EB/OL]. [2023-08-05]. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf.
|
5 |
|
6 |
何贵兵, 陈诚, 何泽桐, 等. 智能组织中的人机协同决策: 基于人机内部兼容性的研究探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (12): 2619- 2627.
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
孙效华, 张义文, 秦觉晓, 等. 人机智能协同研究综述[J]. 包装工程, 2020, 41 (18): 1- 11.
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
Power D J. Decision support systems: A historical overview [M]//Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008: 121-140.
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
Castellano G, Villalba S D, Camurri A. Recognising human emotions from body movement and gesture dynamics[M]//Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007: 71-82.
|
41 |
Eyben F, Weninger F, Gross F, et al. Recent developments in openSMILE, the Munich open-source multimedia feature extractor[C]//Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia. New York: ACM, 2013: 835-838.
|
42 |
|
43 |
Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, et al. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality [EB/OL]. [2023-05-06]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4546v1.
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
Riek L D, Rabinowitch T C, Chakrabarti B, et al. How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots[C]//Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. New York: ACM, 2009: 245-246.
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
Freedy A, Weltman G, Freedy E, et al. Adaptive delegation interfaces (ADI) for improved situation awareness and reduction of workload in controlling multiple unmanned vehicles (UV) [EB/OL]. [2023-03-01]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235131830_Adaptive_Delegation_Interfaces_ADI_for_Improved_Situation_Awareness_and_Reduction_of_Workload_in_Controlling_Multiple_Unmanned_Vehicles_UV.
|
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
|
58 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
Poursabzi-Sangdeh F, Goldstein D G, Hofman J M, et al. Manipulating and measuring model interpretability[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 2021: 1-52.
|
64 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
|
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
|
70 |
|
71 |
Scerbo M W. Adaptive automation[M]//Neuroergonomics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006: 239-252.
|
72 |
|
73 |
|
74 |
Buolamwini J, Gebru T. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification[C]// Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. New York: PMLR, 2018: 77-91.
|
75 |
|
76 |
|
77 |
|
78 |
李睿晶, 房超, 陈凯. 新时代我国人工智能发展回顾与展望[J]. 科技智囊, 2023 (1): 14- 21.
|
79 |
|
80 |
|
81 |
Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U. The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysiss[R]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016.
|
82 |
|
83 |
张丹, 李佳蔚. 探索思维的力量: 脑机接口研究现状与展望[J]. 科技导报, 2017, 35 (9): 62- 67.
|
84 |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |