科技导报 >

2025 , Vol. 43 >Issue 3: 59 - 73

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.09.01355

特色专题：混合智能中的情感交互与协同决策

数字企业人机群体智慧决策的微观基础

  • 刘涛 , 1, 2 ,
  • 于文环 , 3 ,
  • 何琳 , 1, 2, * ,
  • 于晓宇 1, 2
展开
  • 1. 上海大学管理学院, 上海 200444
  • 2. 上海企业创新与高质量发展研究中心, 上海 200444
  • 3. 浙江大学管理学院, 杭州 310058
何琳（通信作者），博士后，研究方向为神经创业与营销，电子信箱：

刘涛，教授，研究方向为神经创业、数智决策，电子信箱：

于文环（共同第一作者），博士研究生，研究方向为神经管理，电子信箱：

收稿日期: 2023-09-05

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-07

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(72472094)

国家自然科学基金重点项目(72232010)

上海市智库青年领军人才专项课题(2024TRC018)

国家资助博士后研究人员计划(GZC20240972)

中国博士后科学基金项目(2024M761922)

上海市超级博士后激励计划(2024231)

版权

版权所有，未经授权，不得转载。
收起

Microfoundations of human-machine collaborative decision-making in digital enterprises

  • Tao LIU , 1, 2 ,
  • Wenhuan YU , 3 ,
  • Lin HE , 1, 2, * ,
  • Xiaoyu YU 1, 2
Expand
  • 1. School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • 2. Shanghai Center for Enterprise Innovation and High-Quality Development Research, Shanghai 200444, China
  • 3. School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received date: 2023-09-05

  Online published: 2025-03-07

Copyright

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
Fold

摘要

随着企业数字化转型的推进，人工智能在管理决策制定中的作用愈发重要，企业高管团队与智能决策系统进行协同决策成为新趋势。本文对人机群体智慧决策现有研究进行综述，指出人机协同效果受到管理者认知、信任、人机互动模式等因素影响。未来研究需基于微观基础视角进一步关注人机群体智慧决策的伦理道德问题、人机协同决策的交互机制与神经基础、智能决策系统对高管认知的长期影响以及人机群体智慧决策过程的治理策略等问题。

关键词： 数字企业; 人机群体智慧决策; 微观基础; 神经管理

本文引用格式

刘涛 , 于文环 , 何琳 , 于晓宇 . 数字企业人机群体智慧决策的微观基础[J]. 科技导报, 2025 , 43(3) : 59 -73 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.09.01355

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
1
陈冬梅, 王俐珍, 陈安霓. 数字化与战略管理理论: 回顾、挑战与展望[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36 (5): 220- 236.

DOI

2
Verhoef P C , Broekhuizen T , Bart Y , et al. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 122: 889- 901.

DOI

3
Sebastian I M, Ross J W, Beath C, et al. How big old companies navigate digital transformation[M]//Strategic Information Management. London: Routledge, 2020: 133-150.

4
刘业政, 孙见山, 姜元春, 等. 大数据的价值发现: 4C模型[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36 (2): 129- 138.

DOI

5
Cascio W F , Montealegre R . How technology is changing work and organizations[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2016, 3: 349- 375.

DOI

6
Fügener A , Grahl J , Gupta A , et al. Will humans-in-the-loop become borgs? merits and pitfalls of working with AI[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2021, 45 (3): 1527- 1556.

DOI

7
Larson L , DeChurch L . Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2020, 31 (1): 101377.

DOI

8
李炜文, 于晓宇, 任之光, 等. 中国情境下战略与创业微观基础研究机遇与挑战: 首届战略与创业微观基础学术会议综述[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2021, 33 (6): 175- 182.

9
Felin T , Foss N J , Ployhart R E . The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2015, 9 (1): 575- 632.

DOI

10
Foss N J , Lindenberg S . Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, 27 (2): 85- 102.

DOI

11
Paruchuri S , Eisenman M . Microfoundations of firm R&D capabilities: A study of inventor networks in a merger[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49 (8): 1509- 1535.

DOI

12
李炜文, 李晓彤, 陈衍泰, 等. 组织能力的微观基础: 研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 1- 22.

13
Podsakoff P M , MacKenzie S B , Lee J Y , et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88 (5): 879- 903.

DOI

14
Mintzberg H . An emerging strategy of "direct" research[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24 (4): 582.

DOI

15
March J G . Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1978, 9 (2): 587.

DOI

16
Simon H A . Models of man[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1957.

17
Cokely E T , Kelley C M . Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation[J]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2009, 4 (1): 20- 33.

DOI

18
Deck C , Jahedi S . The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments[J]. European Economic Review, 2015, 78: 97- 119.

DOI

19
刘永芳. 有限理性的本质辨析与价值之争[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (11): 1293- 1309.

20
Xiong W , Fan H M , Ma L , et al. Challenges of human-machine collaboration in risky decision-making[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2022, 9 (1): 89- 103.

DOI

21
Hambrick D C , Mason P A . Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9 (2): 193- 206.

DOI

22
杨林, 和欣, 顾红芳. 高管团队经验、动态能力与企业战略突变: 管理自主权的调节效应[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36 (6): 168- 188.

23
Sundaramurthy C , Lewis M . Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28 (3): 397- 415.

DOI

24
薛鸿博, 杨俊, 迟考勋. 创业者先前行业工作经验对新创企业商业模式创新的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16 (11): 1661- 1669.

DOI

25
Jia Y Y , Tsui A S , Yu X Y . Beyond bounded rationality: CEO reflective capacity and firm sustainability performance[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2021, 17 (4): 777- 814.

DOI

26
Yu X Y , Liu T , He L , et al. Micro-foundations of strategic decision-making in family business organisations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective[J]. Long Range Planning, 2023, 56 (5): 102198.

DOI

27
Cooper D J , Kagel J H . Are two heads better than one? team versus individual play in signaling games[J]. American Economic Review, 2005, 95 (3): 477- 509.

DOI

28
Carr P B , Walton G M . Cues of working together fuel intrinsic motivation[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2014, 53: 169- 184.

DOI

29
Lu K L , Xue H , Nozawa T , et al. Cooperation makes a group be more creative[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2019, 29 (8): 3457- 3470.

DOI

30
Cason T N , Mui V L . A laboratory study of group polarisation in the team dictator game[J]. The Economic Journal, 1997, 107 (444): 1465- 1483.

DOI

31
廖颖, 刘鹏, 席酉民. 不确定环境下的战略决策: 类比推理的作用[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40 (8): 17- 29.

32
李平, 杨政银. 简练规则: 急速变革时代的战略决策, 管理悖论及动态能力: 与凯瑟琳·艾森哈特的对话[J]. 清华管理评论, 2016 (12): 56- 64.

33
何贵兵, 陈诚, 何泽桐, 等. 智能组织中的人机协同决策: 基于人机内部兼容性的研究探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (12): 2619- 2627.

DOI

34
胡保亮, 梅婕, 张素平. 人机协同决策: 文献综述[J]. 信息与管理研究, 2024, 9 (2/3): 51- 64.

35
Mueller-Saegebrecht S . Business model innovation decisions: The role of group biases and risk willingness[J]. Management Decision, 2024, 62 (13): 69- 108.

DOI

36
关健, 杨白沙, 段澄梦. 企业并购溢价决策中的群体极化效应研究: TMT同质性与CEO权力的调节作用[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 24 (4): 97- 106.

37
Twardawski T , Kind A . Board overconfidence in mergers and acquisitions[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 165: 114026.

DOI

38
Simon H A . The new science of management decision[M]. New York: Harper, 1960.

39
Davenport T , Short J E . The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1990, 31: 11- 27.

40
曾大军, 张柱, 梁嘉琦, 等. 机器行为与人机协同决策理论和方法[J]. 管理科学, 2021, 34 (6): 55- 59.

41
陈剑, 黄朔, 刘运辉. 从赋能到使能: 数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36 (2): 117- 128.

DOI

42
刘淑春, 闫津臣, 张思雪, 等. 企业管理数字化变革能提升投入产出效率吗[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37 (5): 170- 190.

DOI

43
Frynas J G , Mol M J , Mellahi K . Management innovation made in China: Haier's rendanheyi[J]. California Management Review, 2018, 61 (1): 71- 93.

DOI

44
李平, 杨政银. 人机融合智能: 人工智能3.0[J]. 清华管理评论, 2018 (7/8): 73- 82.

45
Latour B . On actor-network theory: A few clarifications[J]. Soziale Welt, 1996, 47 (4): 369- 381.

46
Tatnall A. Actor-network theory in information systems research[M]//Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, First Edition. Pennsylvania: IGI Global, 2005: 42-46.

47
Walsham G. Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects[M]//Information Systems and Qualitative Research. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997: 466-480.

48
谢小云, 左玉涵, 胡琼晶. 数字化时代的人力资源管理: 基于人与技术交互的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37 (1): 200- 216.

DOI

49
Schwab K . The fourth industrial revolution[M]. Crown Business, 2017.

50
Kaplan A , Haenlein M . Rulers of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence[J]. Business Horizons, 2020, 63 (1): 37- 50.

DOI

51
Syam N , Sharma A . Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2018, 69: 135- 146.

DOI

52
Ferràs-Hernández X . The future of management in a world of electronic brains[J]. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2018, 27 (2): 260- 263.

DOI

53
Puranam P . Human-AI collaborative decision-making as an organization design problem[J]. Journal of Organization Design, 2021, 10 (2): 75- 80.

DOI

54
Abrokwah-Larbi K , Awuku-Larbi Y . The impact of artificial intelligence in marketing on the performance of business organizations: Evidence from SMEs in an emerging economy[J]. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 2024, 16 (4): 1090- 1117.

DOI

55
How big data is playing recruiter for specialized workers [EB/OL]. (2013-04-27) [2024-10-05]. http://www.nytimes.com.

56
The Wall Street Journal. The world's largest hedge fund is building an algorithmic model from its employees' brains [EB/OL]. (2016-12-23) [2024-10-05]. https://www.wsj.com/.

57
The Wall Street Journal. Picking a health plan? An algorithm could help[EB/OL]. (2015-11-11) [2024-10-05]. https://www.wsj.com/.

58
Allas T, Bughin J, Chui M, et al. Crossing the frontier. How to apply AI for impact[R]. San Francisco, California: McKinsey, 2018.

59
Kellogg K C , Valentine M A , Christin A . Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14 (1): 366- 410.

DOI

60
张志学, 华中生, 谢小云. 数智时代人机协同的研究现状与未来方向[J]. 管理工程学报, 2024, 38 (1): 1- 13.

61
Metcalf L , Askay D A , Rosenberg L B . Keeping humans in the loop: Pooling knowledge through artificial swarm intelligence to improve business decision making[J]. California Management Review, 2019, 61 (4): 84- 109.

DOI

62
Schoemaker P J H, Tetlock P E. Building a more intelligent enterprise[M]//Who Wins in a Digital World? Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2019: 103-122.

63
Jarrahi M H . Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making[J]. Business Horizons, 2018, 61 (4): 577- 586.

DOI

64
Raisch S , Krakowski S . Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46 (1): 192- 210.

DOI

65
Shirado H , Christakis N A . Locally noisy autonomous agents improve global human coordination in network experiments[J]. Nature, 2017, 545 (7654): 370- 374.

DOI

66
Krishna R , Lee D , Li F F , et al. Socially situated artificial intelligence enables learning from human interaction[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119 (39): e2115730119.

67
The Economist. Businesses are finding AI hard to adopt [EB/OL]. (2020-06-11) [2024-10-05]. https://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2020/06/11/businesses-are-finding-ai-hard-to-adopt.

68
Davenport T , Guha A , Grewal D , et al. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2020, 48 (1): 24- 42.

DOI

69
Paschen U , Pitt C , Kietzmann J . Artificial intelligence: Building blocks and an innovation typology[J]. Business Horizons, 2020, 63 (2): 147- 155.

DOI

70
Keding C , Meissner P . Managerial overreliance on AI-augmented decision-making processes: How the use of AI-based advisory systems shapes choice behavior in R&D investment decisions[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 171: 120970.

DOI

71
Willcox G, Rosenberg L. Short paper: Swarm intelligence amplifies the IQ of collaborating teams[C]//Proceedings of Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (AI4I). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2019: 111-114.

72
Günther W A , Rezazade Mehrizi M H , Huysman M , et al. Debating big data: A literature review on realizing value from big data[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2017, 26 (3): 191- 209.

DOI

73
Fountain T , Mccarthy B , Saleh T . Building the AI-powered organization technology isn't the biggest challenge, culture is[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2019, 97 (4): 62- 73.

74
De Cremer D , McGuire J . Human-algorithm collaboration works best if humans lead (because it is fair!)[J]. Social Justice Research, 2022, 35 (1): 33- 55.

DOI

75
Shrestha Y R , Ben-Menahem S M , von Krogh G . Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence[J]. California Management Review, 2019, 61 (4): 66- 83.

DOI

76
Jago A S . Algorithms and authenticity[J]. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2019, 5 (1): 38- 56.

DOI

77
Mirbabaie M , Brünker F , Möllmann Frick N R J , et al. The rise of artificial intelligence-understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace[J]. Electronic Markets, 2022, 32 (1): 73- 99.

DOI

78
Brougham D , Haar J . Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): Employees' perceptions of our future workplace[J]. Journal of Management & Organization, 2018, 24 (2): 239- 257.

79
Seeber I , Bittner E , Briggs R O , et al. Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration[J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57 (2): 103174.

80
徐鹏, 徐向艺. 人工智能时代企业管理变革的逻辑与分析框架[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36 (1): 122- 129.

DOI

81
Rahwan I , Cebrian M , Obradovich N , et al. Machine behaviour[J]. Nature, 2019, 568 (7753): 477- 486.

DOI

82
Kingsbury L , Hong W Z . A multi-brain framework for social interaction[J]. Trends in Neurosciences, 2020, 43 (9): 651- 666.

DOI

83
Liu T , Pelowski M . A new research trend in social neuroscience: Towards an interactive-brain neuroscience[J]. PsyCh Journal, 2014, 3 (3): 177- 188.

DOI

84
Hasson U , Ghazanfar A A , Galantucci B , et al. Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2012, 16 (2): 114- 121.

DOI

85
Liu T , Pelowski M . Clarifying the interaction types in two-person neuroscience research[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2014, 8: 276.

86
He Y Y , Wang X Y , Lu K L , et al. Letting leaders spontaneously emerge yields better creative outcomes and higher leader-follower interbrain synchrony during creative group communication[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2023, 33 (11): 6559- 6572.

DOI

87
Tang H H , Mai X Q , Wang S , et al. Interpersonal brain synchronization in the right temporo-parietal junction during face-to-face economic exchange[J]. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2016, 11 (1): 23- 32.

DOI

88
Jiang J , Chen C S , Dai B H , et al. Leader emergence through interpersonal neural synchronization[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112 (14): 4274- 4279.

89
Liu T , Duan L , Dai R N , et al. Team-work, team-brain: Exploring synchrony and team interdependence in a nine-person drumming task via multiparticipant hyperscanning and inter-brain network topology with fNIRS[J]. NeuroImage, 2021, 237: 118147.

DOI

90
Zhang M M , Jia H B , Zheng M X , et al. Group decision-making behavior in social dilemmas: Inter-brain synchrony and the predictive role of personality traits[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2021, 168: 110315.

DOI

91
Gazzola V , Rizzolatti G , Wicker B , et al. The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions[J]. NeuroImage, 2007, 35 (4): 1674- 1684.

DOI

92
Hortensius R , Hekele F , Cross E S . The perception of emotion in artificial agents[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2018, 10 (4): 852- 864.

DOI

93
Wang Y , Quadflieg S . In our own image? Emotional and neural processing differences when observing human-human vs human-robot interactions[J]. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2015, 10 (11): 1515- 1524.

DOI

94
Kätsyri J , de Gelder B , de Borst A W . Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces[J]. NeuroImage, 2020, 204: 116216.

DOI

95
Belkaid M , Kompatsiari K , De Tommaso D , et al. Mutual gaze with a robot affects human neural activity and delays decision-making processes[J]. Science Robotics, 2021, 6 (58): eabc5044.

DOI

96
Vaitonytė J , Alimardani M , Louwerse M M . Scoping review of the neural evidence on the uncanny valley[J]. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2023, 9: 100263.

DOI

97
Glikson E , Woolley A W . Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14 (2): 627- 660.

DOI

98
Du N , Huang K Y , Yang X J . Not all information is equal: Effects of disclosing different types of likelihood information on trust, compliance and reliance, and task performance in human-automation teaming[J]. Human Factors, 2020, 62 (6): 987- 1001.

DOI

99
Lee J D , See K A . Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance[J]. Human Factors, 2004, 46 (1): 50- 80.

DOI

100
Madhavan P , Wiegmann D A . Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: An integrative review[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2007, 8 (4): 277- 301.

DOI

101
Wiegmann D A , Rich A , Zhang H . Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2001, 2 (4): 352- 367.

DOI

102
Logg J M , Minson J A , Moore D A . Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2019, 151: 90- 103.

DOI

103
Fügener A , Grahl J , Gupta A , et al. Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation[J]. Information Systems Research, 2022, 33 (2): 678- 696.

DOI

104
Leyer M , Schneider S . Decision augmentation and automation with artificial intelligence: Threat or opportunity for managers?[J]. Business Horizons, 2021, 64 (5): 711- 724.

DOI

105
Parasuraman R , Riley V . Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse[J]. Human Factors, 1997, 39 (2): 230- 253.

DOI

106
吴俊, 张迪, 刘涛, 等. 人类对人工智能信任的接受度及脑认知机制研究: 实证研究与神经科学实验的元分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2024, 38 (1): 60- 73.

107
Fareri D S , Hackett K , Tepfer L J , et al. Age-related differences in ventral striatal and default mode network function during reciprocated trust[J]. NeuroImage, 2022, 256: 119267.

DOI

108
Henschel A , Hortensius R , Cross E S . Social cognition in the age of human-robot interaction[J]. Trends in Neurosciences, 2020, 43 (6): 373- 384.

DOI

109
Xie E H , Liu M D , Li K S , et al. The single- and dualbrain mechanisms underlying the adviser's confidence expression strategy switching during influence management[J]. NeuroImage, 2023, 270: 119957.

DOI

110
Hogenhuis A , Hortensius R . Domain-specific and domaingeneral neural network engagement during human-robot interactions[J]. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 2022, 56 (10): 5902- 5916.

DOI

111
Schindler S , Kruse O , Stark R , et al. Attributed social context and emotional content recruit frontal and limbic brain regions during virtual feedback processing[J]. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2019, 19 (2): 239- 252.

112
Yun J H , Lee E J , Kim D H . Behavioral and neural evidence on consumer responses to human doctors and medical artificial intelligence[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2021, 38 (4): 610- 625.

113
Sowa K , Przegalinska A , Ciechanowski L . Cobots in knowledge work Human-AI collaboration in managerial professions[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 125: 135- 142.

DOI

114
Murray A , Rhymer J , Sirmon D G . Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46 (3): 552- 571.

DOI

115
Daugherty P R . Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2018, 96 (4): 114- 123.

116
Jia N , Luo X M , Fang Z , et al. When and how artificial intelligence Augments Employee creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2024, 67 (1): 5- 32.

DOI

117
Xiong W , Wang C , Ma L . Partner or subordinate? Sequential risky decision-making behaviors under human-machine collaboration contexts[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2023, 139: 107556.

DOI

118
Xiong W, Tsao L, Ma L. Preferences for the decision weight and accountability assignment in risky decision-making under human-machine collaboration contexts[C]// Proceedings of AHFE International, Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2024): Integrating People and Intelligent Systems. AHFE International, 2024: 532-540.

119
Haesevoets T , De Cremer D , Dierckx K , et al. Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 119: 106730.

DOI

120
Huang M H , Rust R T . Artificial intelligence in service[J]. Journal of Service Research, 2018, 21 (2): 155- 172.

DOI

121
Parry K , Cohen M , Bhattacharya S . Rise of the machines[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2016, 41 (5): 571- 594.

122
Zhou Y Y , Fei Z Y , He Y Q , et al. How human-chatbot interaction impairs charitable giving: The role of moral judgment[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2022, 178 (3): 849- 865.

DOI

123
Dietvorst B J , Bartels D M . Consumers object to algorithms making morally relevant tradeoffs because of algorithms' consequentialist decision strategies[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2022, 32 (3): 406- 424.

DOI

124
Krügel S , Ostermaier A , Uhl M . ChatGPT's inconsistent moral advice influences users' judgment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13 (1): 4569.

DOI

125
Chen F Y , Huang S C . Robots or humans for disaster response? Impact on consumer prosociality and possible explanations[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2023, 33 (2): 432- 440.

DOI

126
Dietvorst B J , Simmons J P , Massey C . Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 2015, 144 (1): 114- 126.

DOI

127
Miklós-Thal J , Tucker C . Collusion by algorithm: Does better demand prediction facilitate coordination between sellers?[J]. Management Science, 2019, 65 (4): 1552- 1561.

DOI

128
Wray-Lake L , Syvertsen A K . The developmental roots of social responsibility in childhood and adolescence[J]. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011, 2011 (134): 11- 25.

DOI

129
Beane M . Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2019, 64 (1): 87- 123.

DOI

130
Sergeeva A V , Faraj S , Huysman M . Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery[J]. Organization Science, 2020, 31 (5): 1248- 1271.

DOI

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区学院南路86号科技导报社　邮编：100081
  • 电话：010-62138113　传真：010-62138113
  • E-mail：kjdbbjb@cast.org.cn

    • 访问统计

      总访问量
      今日访问
      在线人数
    科技导报官方微信公众号
    京ICP备14028469号-1　
    版权所有 © 《科技导报》编辑部