低渗透疏松油藏注水井试井分析
雷霄1 , 孙召勃2 , 王妍妍2 , 刘双琪1 , 王世朝1
1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司湛江分公司, 湛江524057;
2. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院, 青岛266580
Well Test Analysis of Water Injection Wells in Low-permeability Unconsolidated Oil Reservoirs
LEI Xiao1 , SUN Zhaobo2 , WANG Yanyan2 , LIU Shuangqi1 , WANG Shichao1
1. Zhanjiang Branch, CNOOC (China) Co., Ltd., Zhanjiang 524057, China;
2. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China
摘要 低渗透疏松油藏由于渗透率较低,存在一定的启动压力梯度,且由于储层岩石胶结疏松,存在中等-较强的应力敏感性,导致原油渗流速度很慢,难以获得充足资料对储层做出合理的解释,油井试井效果难以取得满意的效果,而低渗透油藏注水井试井可以很好地解决这个难题。综合考虑流度比、启动压力梯度、应力敏感性等的影响,建立了低渗透疏松油藏注水井低速非达西渗流有效井径试井的数学模型。由于所建模型具有强非线性,采用稳定的有限差分格式利用Newton-Raphson 迭代法求得数值解,进一步研究了压力动态特征及其影响因素,绘制了用于实际资料拟合分析的典型试井曲线。
关键词 :
低渗透 ,
注水井 ,
启动压力梯度 ,
试井 ,
应力敏感性
Abstract :Low-permeability unconsolidated reservoirs have a threshold pressure gradient to a certain extent due to low permeability. In addition, the reservoir rock shows medium to strong stress sensitivity because of the unconsolidated cementation, resulting in low oil flow velocity. Therefore, it is difficult to obtain sufficient information to make a reasonable interpretation. Water-injection well test is a good way to solve this problem. Based on analysis of the mobility ratio, the effects of stress sensitivity and threshold pressure gradient, a mathematical model for water-injection well test in low-permeability unconsolidated reservoirs was established. Since this model has strong nonlinearity, stable finite-difference scheme and Newton-Raphson iteration method were adopted to obtain the arithmetic solution. The pressure performance and influencing factors were also evaluated, and the typical well testing curves for analysis of real datawere plotted.
Key words :
low-permeability unconsolidated reservoir
water-injection well
threshold pressure gradient
well test
stress sensitivity
收稿日期: 2014-02-16
基金资助: 国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05051)
作者简介 : 雷霄,高级工程师,研究方向为油气藏工程和油气藏数值模拟,电子信箱:leix@cnooc.com.cn
引用本文:
雷霄, 孙召勃, 王妍妍, 刘双琪, 王世朝. 低渗透疏松油藏注水井试井分析[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(20): 69-73.
LEI Xiao, SUN Zhaobo, WANG Yanyan, LIU Shuangqi, WANG Shichao. Well Test Analysis of Water Injection Wells in Low-permeability Unconsolidated Oil Reservoirs. journal1, 2014, 32(20): 69-73.
链接本文:
http://www.kjdb.org/CN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.20.011 或 http://www.kjdb.org/CN/Y2014/V32/I20/69
[1] 王光付, 廖荣凤, 李江龙, 等. 中国石化低渗透油藏开发状况及前景[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2007, 14(3): 84-89. Wang Guangfu, Liao Rongfeng, Li Jianglong, et al. The development situation and future of low permeability reservoirs of SINOPEC[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2007, 14(3): 84-89.
[2] 尹洪军, 何应付. 变形介质油藏渗流规律和压力特征分析[J]. 水动力 学进展与研究, 2002, 17(5):538-546. Yin Hongjun, He Yingfu. Analysis on flow through porous media and pressure characteristics deformed reservoirs [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2002, 17(5): 538-546.
[3] 黄延章. 低渗透油层渗流机理研究[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1998. Huang Yanzhang. Seepage mechanism of low permeability reservoir[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1998.
[4] 祝春生, 程林松, 阳忠华, 等. 特低渗透砂岩油藏渗流特性研究[J]. 油 气地质与采收率, 2008, 15(2): 102-104. Zhu Chunsheng, Cheng Linsong, Yang Zhonghua, et al. Flowing characteristics in extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(2): 102-104.
[5] 方甲中, 程林松, 任胜利, 等. 动边界复合油藏低速非达西渗流试井分 析[J]. 西南石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 33(5): 104-108. Fang Jiazhong, Cheng Linsong, Ren Shengli, et al. Well test analysis of low velocity and non-darcy flow in composite reservoir with dynamic boundary[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University: Science & Technology Edition, 2011, 33(5): 104-108.
[6] 张艳玉, 张卫东, 崔国亮, 等. 低渗透双重介质油藏试井解释模型[J]. 陕西科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 30(3): 65-69. Zhang Yanyu, Zhang Weidong, Cui Guoliang, et al. Well test interpretation model for dual media low permeability reservoir[J]. Journal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2012, 30(3): 65-69.
[7] 刘启国, 杨旭明, 魏红梅, 等. 动边界影响的低渗双重介质油气藏试井 解释模型[J]. 西南石油学院学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 26(5): 30-33. Liu Qiguo, Yang Xuming, Wei Hongmei, et al. Study of well-test model of low permeability's dual-pore media with flowing boundary in oil and gas [J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University: Science & Technology Edition, 2004, 26(5): 30-33.
[8] 张德志, 王子胜, 战艾婷. 高速非达西渗流时三重介质油藏的压力响 应[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2009, 16(1): 97-110. Zhang Dezhi, Wang Zisheng, Zhan Aiting. Pressure response of tripleporosity-media oil reservoirs with high-velocity non-Darcy flow [J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2009, 16(1): 97-110.
[9] 尹洪军, 付春权, 万贵春, 等. 多重复合低渗透油藏注水井压力动态分 析[J]. 石油学报, 2002, 23(4): 70-75. Yin Hongjun, Fu Chunquan, Wan Guichun, et al. Pressure transient analysis of water injection well in multiple composite low permeability reservoir [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2002, 23(4): 70-75.
[10] 刘佳洁, 孟英峰, 李皋, 等. 三区流体复合注水井试井模型研究[J]. 石 油天然气学报, 2013(2): 120-125. Liu Jiajie, MengYingfeng, Li Gao, et al. Three-zone fluid composite well test model of injection wells [J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2013(2): 120-125.
[11] 刘曰武, 刘俊丽, 刘振庆. 注水井试井方法综述[J]. 油气井测试, 1998, 7(1): 69-73. Liu Yuewu, Liu Junli, Liu Zhenqing. Overview of the well testing method for injection wells [J]. Well Testing, 1998, 7(1): 69-73.
[12] 黄勇, 李春兰, 程林松, 等. 低渗透油藏垂直裂缝井产能评价新方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17(1): 99-101. Huang Yong, Li Chunlan, Cheng Linsong, et al. A new method of estimating productivity of vertically fractured wells in low permeability oil reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010, 17 (1): 99-101.
[13] 雷群, 胥云, 蒋廷学, 等. 用于提高低-特低渗透油气藏改造效果的 缝网压裂技术[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(2): 237-241. Lei Qun, Xu Yun, Jiang Tingxue, et al. "Fracture network" fracturing technique for improving post-fracturing performance of low and ultralow permeability reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(2): 237-241.
[14] 汪全林, 唐海, 吕栋梁, 等. 低渗薄层油藏多垂直裂缝水平井产量计 算公式[J]. 西安石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 25(5): 42-45. Wang Quanlin, Tang Hai, Lü Dongliang, et al. Production formula for the horizontal well in thin low-permeability reservoir with multiple vertical fracturing fractures [J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University: Natural Science Edition, 2010,25(5):42-45.
[15] 李维国, 黄炳家, 同登科, 等. 数值计算方法[M]. 东营: 石油大学出版 社, 2004. Li Weiguo, Huang Bingjia, Tong Dengke, et al. Numerical calculation methods[M]. Dongying: Petroleum University Press, 2004.
[1]
赵玉集, 王学武, 凌浩川. 致密油藏流体渗流规律实验研究 [J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(28/29): 59-63.
[2]
朱维耀, 田英爱, 于明旭, 韩宏彦, 张雪龄. 微圆管中流体的微观流动机制 [J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(27): 23-27.
[3]
罗莉涛, 萧汉敏, 刘卫东, 孙灵辉, 李继业, 苟斐斐. 安塞低渗透油藏回注水中悬浮颗粒堵塞规律 [J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(15): 69-72.
[4]
杨正明, 高天放, 冯骋, 王智, 刘学伟. 非均质性对超低渗透油藏产水机制影响实验 [J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(13): 36-40.
[5]
张乔良, 储莎莎, 姜平, 许月明, 彭文丰, 李明. 涠洲F4油田流沙港组储层微观结构及两相渗流特征 [J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(12): 54-59.
[6]
滕起;杨正明;刘学伟;熊生春;于荣泽;冯骋. 特低渗透油藏水驱油物理模拟相似准则的推导和应用 [J]. , 2013, 31(9): 40-45.
[7]
朱维耀;董熇;宋洪庆;杨焦生;岳明. 低渗透煤层气水两相非线性渗流数学模型及计算分析 [J]. , 2013, 31(22): 36-39.
[8]
熊健;王小军;吕雷. 低渗油藏不对称垂直裂缝井产能模型 [J]. , 2013, 31(22): 40-43.
[9]
杨正明;冯骋;刘学伟;朱大伟;滕起;. 超低渗透砂岩平板模型应力敏感性实验 [J]. , 2013, 31(13): 29-33.
[10]
李海燕;吴胜和;岳大力. 高尚堡油田深层沙三2亚段沉积微相及成岩储集相特征 [J]. , 2012, 30(9): 53-61.
[11]
于红岩;李洪奇;党娜;于晓禾;. 鄂尔多斯盆地超低渗透储层形成的宏观地质因素分析 [J]. , 2012, 30(9): 44-48.
[12]
熊生春;孙军昌;何英;田文博. 低渗透油藏二元复合驱微观机制研究 [J]. , 2012, 30(35): 20-24.
[13]
张英芝;杨正明;唐立根;张硕;刘学伟. 特低渗油藏注CO2 驱油微观机制 [J]. , 2012, 30(35): 29-32.
[14]
段景杰;李珮;陈芳萍;王敏;石彬;丁磊. 延长油田滞后注水区注水开发特征及效果 [J]. , 2012, 30(35): 39-43.
[15]
张乔良;孙军昌;熊生春;杨正明;刘学伟. 特低渗透储层岩石渗透率应力敏感新机制 [J]. , 2012, 30(35): 44-47.