福岛核事故后的海洋放射性排放和监测研究进展

陈灿; 李俊峰; 王建龙

doi:10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.17.009

PDF(539 KB)

科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (17) : 105-112. DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.17.009

综述

福岛核事故后的海洋放射性排放和监测研究进展

作者信息 -

清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院, 北京 100084

作者简介:

陈灿,副研究员,研究方向为辐射防护与环境保护,电子信箱:chencan@tsinghua.edu.cn

Marine radioactivity emission and monitoring after Fukushima Daiichi Accident

Author information -

Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, INET, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

摘要

海洋放射性监测是保障海洋核环境安全的重要支撑。回顾了日本福岛核事故对海洋的放射性排放特点、监测内容和监测结果，介绍了国内外海洋放射性监测工作，总结分析了海洋放射性监测项目、监测布点、监测方法、监测设备、监测数据指导核应急响应等方面的进展，为我国海洋放射性监测提供参考。

Abstract

Marine radioactivity monitoring is an important scientific basis for the marine nuclear safety. The effluent released to marine and marine monitoring after Japan's Fukushima Daiichi accident were briefly reviewed. The marine radioactivity monitoring work were introduced, including monitoring contents, monitoring methods, monitoring equipment and monitoring data to guide nuclear emergency response. Recommendations on the development of national marine radioactivity detection technology were proposed.

导出引用

陈灿, 李俊峰, 王建龙. 福岛核事故后的海洋放射性排放和监测研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40(17): 105-112 https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.17.009

CHEN Can, LI Junfeng, WANG Jianlong. Marine radioactivity emission and monitoring after Fukushima Daiichi Accident[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40(17): 105-112 https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.17.009

参考文献

[1] International Atomic Energy Agency.The Fukushima Daiichi accident report by the Director General[R].Vienna:International Atomic Energy Agency, 2015.
[2] Du Bois P B, Laguionie P, Boust D, et al.Estimation of marine source-term following Fukushima Dai-ichi accident[J].Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2012, 114(S1):2-9.
[3] 李冰, 陈莹莹, 余少青, 等.福岛第一核电站事故后放射性废液的泄漏/排放及辐射影响评估[J].辐射防护, 2021, 32(6):336-347.
[4] 林武辉, 陈立奇, 余雯, 等.福岛核事故源项评价[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2015, 45(12):1875-1885.
[5] 环境保护部(环境保护部核与辐射安全监管二司, 环境保护部核与辐射安全中心).日本福岛核事故[M].北京:中国原子能出版社, 2014.
[6] UNSCEAR.Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great east-Japan earthquake and tsunami[R].New York:UNSCEAR, 2013.
[7] 赵博, 马如冰.内陆核电厂严重事故工况下确保水资源安全的应急预案研究[M]//潘自强, 主编.内陆核电厂及核能发展中的几个重要安全、环境问题研究.北京:中国原子能出版社, 2015:193-219.
[8] Burns P C, Ewing R C, Navrotsky A.Nuclear fuel in a reactor accident[J].Science, 2012, 335(6073):1184-1188.
[9] 林武辉, 陈立奇, 何建华, 等.日本福岛核事故后的海洋放射性监测进展[J].中国环境科学, 2015, 35(1):269-276.
[10] Nuclear Regulation Authority Japan.Readings of sea area monitoring[EB/OL].[2021-05-11].https://www.nsr.go.jp/english/.
[11] 云桂春, 成徐州.压水反应堆水化学[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 2009.
[12] 唐森铭, 商照荣.近海辐射环境与生物多样性保护[J].核安全, 2009(2):1-10.
[13] 蒋跃进.福岛核电站核泄漏导致海洋放射性污染引发的启示和警示[C]//广东海事高级论坛.广州:广东省航海学会, 2012:488-494.
[14] Alpert D J, Chanin D I, Ritchie L T.Relative importance of individual elements to LWR accident consequence estimates assuming equal release fractions[J].Nuclear Safety, 1987, 28(1):77-86.
[15] 夏益华, 陈凌, 马吉增, 等.核应急监测分队手册[M].北京:原子能出版社, 2009.
[16] 余雯, 李奕良, 何建华, 等.海洋核应急情况下的监测项目和检测方法[J].辐射防护, 2013, 33(1):49-53.
[17] International Atomic Energy Agency.Operational intervention levels for reactor emergencies and methodology for their derivation[R].Vienna:International Atomic Energy Agency, EPR NPP OILs, 2017.
[18] International Atomic Energy Agency.Generic assessment procedures for determining protective actions during a reactor accident[R].IAEA-TECDOC-955.Vienna:IAEA, 1997.
[19] 核动力厂核事故环境应急监测技术规范(HJ1128-2020)[S].北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2020.
[20] 王亮, 张春明, 刘永叶, 等.加强海洋放射性监测网络建设[J].中国科技投资, 2012(29):54-56.
[21] Jones D G.Development and application of marine gamma-ray measurements:A review[J].Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2001, 53(3):313-333.
[22] Povinec P P.Recent developments in radioanaytical technologies for environmental investigations[J].Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2013, 295(1):537-544.
[23] Thornton B, Ohnishi S, Ura T, et al.Continuous measurement of radionuclide distribution off Fukushima using a towed sea-bed gamma ray spectrometer[J].Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers, 2013, 79:10-19.
[24] 王立奎.海洋核辐射监测方法及其典型应用[J].科技经济导刊, 2016(18):89-90.
[25] 凌鑫, 邹树梁, 李书帆.国内外海上应急辐射监测比较研究[J].资源节约与环保, 2018(10):98-99.
[26] 张玉敏, 李红, 朱春来.海洋核污染与放射性监测技术[J].舰船科学技术, 2010, 32(12):76-79.
[27] 陈立奇, 何建华, 林武辉, 等.海洋核污染的应急监测与评估技术展望[J].中国工程科学, 2011, 13(10):34-39.
[28] 吴丙伟, 张颖颖, 刘岩, 等.基于大浮标的海洋放射性原位监测系统研究[J].海洋技术学报, 2019, 38(3):51-58.
[29] 刘占阳, 胡澄, 孙雪峰, 等.一种基于滨海核电站海上γ辐射剂量率的智能化自动监测系统研究与设计[J].应用海洋学学报, 2020, 39(2):273-278.
[30] 曾志, 苏健, 衣宏昌, 等.海水放射性监测装置研制及初步测试结果[J].辐射防护, 2012, 33(1):46-53.
[31] 邹旸, 邹树梁.我国核应急发展现状与前沿动态研究[J].中国核电, 2020, 13(1):114-119.
[32] 张金涛, 张建岗.福岛核事故后我国核应急技术与装备研发并进[J].中国核工业, 2016(5):27-29.
[33] 刘广山.海洋放射性监测面临的挑战与对策——由日本福岛核电站事故引发的思考[C]//中国核学会2013年学术年会.哈尔滨:中国核学会, 2013:8-14.
[34] 钱锐, 孙国金, 黄仁杰, 等.国内外近岸海域放射性监测比较及发展建议[J].环境影响评价, 2016, 38(5):51-54.
[35] 谢骏箭, 周鹏, 蔡建东, 等.我国海洋核事故应急监测与环境评价所面临的问题及对策[J].海洋环境科学, 2015, 34(4):622-629.
[36] 刘广山.日本福岛核电站事故后的海洋放射化学[J].核化学与放射化学, 2015, 37(5):341-354.
[37] 张旭东.我国水体放射性核素监测领域添"利器"[N/OL].[2021-01-12].http://www.xinhuanet.com//politics/2016-04/21/c_128918916.htm.
[38] International Atomic Energy Agency.Actions to protect the public in an emergency due to severe conditions at a light water reactor[R].Vienna:IAEA-EPR-NPP, 2013.
[39] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Civil Aviation Organization, et al.Preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency.IAEA Safety Standards Series No.GSR Part 7[R].Vienna:IAEA, 2015.
[40] 于红, 刘咏梅.国内核电厂应急照射情况下干预准则与IAEA相关导则的比较[J].核动力工程, 2015, 36(3):50-53.
[41] Kobayashi T, Kawamura H, Fujii K, et al.Development of a short-term emergency assessment system of the marine environmental radioactivity around Japan[J].Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2017, 54(5):609-616.
[42] 郭猜, 林权益, 岳会国, 等.核电厂海域放射性后果评价系统[J].科技导报, 2017, 35(13):45-51.
[43] 倪甲林, 于涛, 刘双印, 等.近岸海洋放射性监测预警技术支持平台的设计与研发[J].应用海洋学学报, 2020, 39(3):444-451.