高校科研人员工作沉浸感对科研绩效的影响——基于人口统计特征的实证检验

doi:10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.19.019

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (552 KB) HTML^new
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要通过问卷调查了中国20所高等院校的772名科研人员，考虑性别、年龄、职称、学科、地区、院校类型和教育程度等7个人口统计学特征，进行差异性检验和回归分析发现，工作沉浸显著正向激励科研绩效；教育程度、地区和院校类别带来的工作沉浸感差异最大；职称和学科带来的工作沉浸感差异不显著。研究解释了同等条件下科研人员绩效差异较大，以及不同条件下科研人员整体性绩效差异较大的重要原因，提议高校应对科研人员工作状态等认知因素给予更多关注。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	熊立
	朱建斌

关键词 ：高校科研人员, 工作沉浸感, 科研绩效

Abstract：Although many studies have discussed the positive impacts of organizational incentive system and salary on scientific research performance, few have empirically examined the positive effect of work-related flow, or estimated the difference due to the level of flow among scientific researchers in China. A survey was sent to 772 scientific researchers from 20 universities in China, considering gender, age, professional rank, subject, region, institutional category and educational background as the 7 demographic variables. By conducting difference test and regression analysis, it is found that work-related flow is positively related to scientific research performance. Among the demographic variables, educational background, region and institutional category cause the largest differences of the level of work-related flow while professional rank and subject have no significant influence. This study explains not only why scientific researchers with the same background conditions perceive different level of individual work-related flow but also why scientific researchers with different background conditions perceive different levels of overall work-related flow. We also suggest that universities need to pay more attention to work-related status and cognitive factors of scientific researchers in the future.

Key words： scientific researchers work-related flow scientific research performance

收稿日期: 2019-09-05

基金资助:江西省高校人文社科基金项目（GL18202）

通讯作者: 朱建斌(通信作者),副教授,研究方向为创新人力资源管理,电子信箱:81605876@qq.com E-mail: 81605876@qq.com

作者简介: 熊立,副教授,研究方向为科研管理、人力资源管理,电子信箱:175420600@qq.com

引用本文:

熊立, 朱建斌. 高校科研人员工作沉浸感对科研绩效的影响——基于人口统计特征的实证检验[J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38(19): 94-102.
XIONG Li, ZHU Jianbin. The effect of work-related flow on scientific researchers' work performance: An empirical study based on demographic characteristics. Science & Technology Review, 2020, 38(19): 94-102.

链接本文:

http://www.kjdb.org/CN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.19.019 或 http://www.kjdb.org/CN/Y2020/V38/I19/94

[1] 王仙雅, 林盛, 陈立芸. 科研压力对科研绩效的影响机制研究——学术氛围与情绪智力的调节作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(10):1564-1571.
[2] 李佳哲, 胡咏梅. 国内高校科研效率和生产率研究述评及研究展望[J]. 现代教育管理, 2018(1):54-61.
[3] 李会炎. 高校科研团队知识共享氛围对成员科研绩效影响的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.
[4] 刘敏, 万丽娟. 中国农业科技创新绩效的地区差异研究——对农业科研机构创新绩效的实证分析[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 25(2):28-36.
[5] Zubair A, Kamal A. Work related flow, psychological capital, and creativity among employees of software houses[J]. Psychological Studies, 2015, 60(3):321-331.
[6] Harris D J, Vine S J, Wilson M R. Is flow really effortless? The complex role of effortful attention[J]. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2017(6):103-114.
[7] Csikszentmihalyi M F. The encyclopedia of positive psychology[M]. Malden:BlackWell, 2009.
[8] Bakker A B. The work-related flow inventory:Construction and initial validation of the WOLF[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2008, 72:400-414.
[9] Bakker A B, Woerkom M V. Flow at work:A self-determination perspective[J]. Occupational Health Science, 2017(1):47-65.
[10] Nielsen K, Cleal B. Predicting flow at work:Investigating the activities and job characteristics that predict flow states at work[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2010, 15(2):180-190.
[11] Yoshida I, Hirao K, Nonaka T. Adjusting challenge-skill balance to improve quality of life in older adults:A randomized controlled trial[J]. American Journal of Occupational Therapy Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 2018, 72(1):12-33.
[12] Løvoll H S, Vittersø J. Can balance be boring? A critique of the "challenges should match skills" hypotheses in flow theory[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2014, 115(1):117-136.
[13] Barua B, Muchiri M, Muenjohn N, et al. A Model exploring relationships between positive leadership, meditation, flow and task performance[J]. The Journal of Developing Areas, 2019, 53(2):229-238.
[14] 祝丽怜, 陈志霞. 工作沉浸研究述评及展望[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012, 32(21):151-153.
[15] 刘广, 虞华君. 外在激励、内在激励对高校教师科研绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(1):201-210.
[16] 刘明生. 高校青年教师科研新论[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2010, 12(6):19-22.
[17] 于珊珊. 银行员工工作压力对工作绩效和心理状态的影响研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.
[18] 王忠, 齐涛, 邵金虎. IT企业知识员工玩趣人格对其创新行为的影响——工作沉浸的中介作用与职业承诺的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2017, 31(5):90-93.
[19] Mosing M A, Butković U A. Can flow experiences be protective of work-related depressive symptoms and burnout? A genetically informative approach[J]. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2018, 226(15):6-11.
[20] Sok P, Sok K M, Luca L M D. The effect of "can do" and "reason to" motivations on service-sales ambidexterity[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2016, 55(3):144-155.
[21] 胡淙洋, 杨多贵, 周志田. 基于主观幸福体验的科研人员工作状况研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2010(4):113-118.
[22] 徐劲松, 陈松. 沉浸体验对心理资本的新拓展——基于对研发人员的研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2017, 31(2):126-133.
[23] 祝丽怜. 员工工作沉浸及其对工作绩效的影响[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2013.
[24] 张和平, 沈红. 薪酬水平对高校教师科研生产率的激励——基于"全国大学教师调查"的实证研究[J]. 现代教育管理, 2019(7):84-91.
[25] Amabile T M. Motivational synergy:Towards new conceptualization of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 1993, 3(3):185-201.