节点-场所模型通过关注交通和土地特征的平衡，为评估公共交通导向开发（TOD）提供了有效的框架。在传统节点-场所模型的基础上，增加可步行性作为新的评价维度，定量描述站点地区的步行网络可达性与设施可步行性，提出了节点-场所-可步行性扩展模型。基于多源数据与地理信息系统技术（GIS），利用扩展模型对北京轨道微中心地铁站点进行了评估和分类，并与传统节点-场所模型评价结果进行比较。结果表明，节点、场所与可步行性之间存在明显的协同作用，站点的发展水平存在较大差异，并且新模型与传统节点-场所模型相比可以更加全面地评价地铁站点。
The node-place model provides an effective framework for evaluating TOD by focusing on the balance of traffic and land characteristics. Based on the traditional node-place model, the node-place-walkability extended model was proposed by adding walkability as a new evaluation dimension to quantitatively describe the accessibility of pedestrian network and walkability of facilities in the site area. Based on multi-source data and GIS technology (GIS), the extended model was used to evaluate and classify Beijing rail microcenter metro stations and compared with the evaluation results of the traditional nodeplace model. The results show that there is an obvious synergy between nodes, places and walkability, that there are large differences in the development levels of stations, and that the new model can evaluate metro stations more comprehensively compared with the traditional node-place model.
[1] Barton H. Eco-neighbourhoods: A review of projects[J]. Local Environment, 1998, 3(2): 159-177.
[2] 夏海山, 韩宝明, 王琳妍 . 中国城市轨道交通 TOD 建设发展 30 年回顾与思考[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2022, 35(4): 2-11.
[3] Bertolini L. Spatial development patterns and public transport: The application of an analytical model in the Netherlands[J]. Planning Practice & Research, 1999, 14(2): 199-210.
[4] 杨镇铭, 杨林川, 崔叙, 等. 成都市中心型地铁站点地区协同性评价[J]. 规划师, 2020, 36(23): 67-74.
[5] 麦地娜·哈尔山, 母睿 . 城市交通与土地利用一体化发展评价[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(7): 86-92.
[6] 王帆, 周健勇 . 城市轨道站点周边交通与土地开发的协调性研究[J]. 物流科技, 2021, 44(2): 126-130.
[7] Vale D S. Transit-oriented development, integration of land use and transport, and pedestrian accessibility: Combining node-place model with pedestrian shed ratio to evaluate and classify station areas in Lisbon[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2015, 45: 70-80.
[8] Zhou M Z. Introducing social contacts into the node-place model: A case study of Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2023, 107: 103532.
[9] Dou M, Wang Y, Dong S. Integrating network centrality and node-place model to evaluate and classify station areas in Shanghai[J]. International Journal of Geo-Information, 2021, 10(6): 414.
[10] Jeffrey D, Boulange C, Giles-Corti B, et al. Using walkability measures to identify train stations with the potential to become transit oriented developments located in walkable neighbourhoods[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2019, 76: 221-231.
[11] Vale D S, Viana C M, Pereira M. The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, 69: 282-293.
[12] Lyu G, Bertolini L, Pfeffer K. Developing a TOD typology for Beijing metro station areas[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2016, 55: 40-50.
[13] 张志健, 高顺祥, 陈越, 等. 基于改进节点-场所模型的城市轨道交通 TOD 评估[J]. 交通运输研究, 2022, 8(3): 143-153.
[14] 苏世亮, 赵冲, 李伯钊, 等 . 公共交通导向发展的研究进展与展望[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2023, 48(2): 175-191.
[15] Robert, Olga L S, Enrique J, 等 . 建成环境对步行和自行车出行的影响——以波哥大为例[J]. 城市交通, 2016, 14(5): 83-96.
[16] Forsyth A, Southworth M. Cities afoot—Pedestrians, walkability and urban design[J]. Journal of Urban Design, 2008, 13(1): 1-3.
[17] 聂煊城, 陈奕言, 陈筝. 建成环境可步行性研究及测度发展综述[J]. 南方建筑, 2022(4): 88-98.
[18] Ewing R, Cervero R. Travel and the built environment: A synthesis[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2001, 1780(1): 87-114.
[19] Wu T, Zhou Y. Measuring the accessibility of metro stations in Tianjin: An origin-destination approach[J]. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2023, 22(2): 693-704.
[20] 周垠, 龙瀛 . 街道步行指数的大规模评价——方法改进及其成都应用[J]. 上海城市规划, 2017(1): 88-93.
[21] 陈永辉. 基于UNA的南京老城区公共空间步行可达性研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2017.
[22] 宋小冬, 陶颖, 潘洁雯, 等 . 城市街道网络分析方法比较研究: 以 Space Syntax、sDNA 和 UNA 为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2020, 256(2): 19-24.
[23] Su S, Pi J, Xie H, et al. Community deprivation, walkability, and public health: Highlighting the social inequalities in land use planning for health promotion[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017(67): 315-326.
[24] Dormann C F, Elith J, Bacher S, et al. Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance[J]. Ecography, 2013, 36(1): 27-46.
