专题:城市交通公平与出行效率

共享出行公平性研究进展

  • 魏宗财 ,
  • 谢蕊敏 ,
  • 黄伟超 ,
  • 兰志懿
展开
  • 1. 华南理工大学建筑学院, 广州 510641;
    2. 华南理工大学亚热带建筑与城市科学全国重点实验室, 广州 510641
魏宗财,副教授,研究方向为大数据与智慧城市、住房与社区规划,电子信箱:weizongcai@scut.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-08-04

  修回日期: 2023-10-08

  网络出版日期: 2024-04-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42271206);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目(2021A1515011073);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD22XGL08)

Research progress on equity of shared mobility: A review

  • WEI Zongcai ,
  • XIE Ruimin ,
  • HUANG Weichao ,
  • LAN Zhiyi
Expand
  • 1. School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, Guangzhou 510641, China

Received date: 2023-08-04

  Revised date: 2023-10-08

  Online published: 2024-04-15

摘要

随着移动互联网技术的迅猛发展和社会对交通公平关注度的持续提升,共享出行作为一种新兴出行方式,正成为公共交通的重要补充,其公平性问题也越发受到学界关注。对共享出行既有成果进行梳理总结,从概念与研究方法、现存问题与影响因素及优化策略3个维度,对国内外共享出行公平性研究进展进行分析和述评。研究发现:与国外相比,国内共享出行公平性研究在对弱势群体出行需求的关注、优化策略等方面存在欠缺,在未来应强化共享出行公平性本土化的理论探讨、深化共享出行纵向公平的影响机制探究、丰富优化策略的研究视角,为改善共享出行公平性提供支撑。

本文引用格式

魏宗财 , 谢蕊敏 , 黄伟超 , 兰志懿 . 共享出行公平性研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2024 , 42(3) : 36 -43 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2024.03.003

Abstract

With the rapid development of mobile internet technology and increasing social concern for transportation equity, shared mobility, as an emerging travel mode, is becoming an essential supplement to public transportation, and its equity is receiving more and more attention from the academic community. Based on the concept of shared mobility, the existing research on the equity of shared mobility is summarized and analyzed from three dimensions, i. e., concepts and research methods, problems and influencing factors, and optimization strategies. The results show that the future domestic research needs to strengthen discussion on localized theory of equity of shared mobility, deepen the exploration of influencing mechanism on vertical inequity in shared mobility, and further enrich the research perspectives on optimization strategies to provide research support for improving the unbalanced and insufficient development of shared mobility.

参考文献

[1] 魏宗财,莫海彤,刘玉亭.面向智慧城市的共享单车出行时空间特征研究——以广州天河中心区为例[J].科技导报, 2018, 36(18):71-80.
[2] Singh Y J. Is smart mobility also gender-smart[J]. Journal of Gender Studies, 2020, 29(7):832-846.
[3] Chen G, Wei Z. Exploring the impacts of built environ-ment on bike-sharing trips on weekends:The case of Guangzhou[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Trans-portation, 2024:1-13.
[4] Shaheen S, Chan N, Bansal A, et al. Shared mobility:A sustainability & technologies workshop:Definitions, indus-try developments, and early understanding[R]. Berkeley:Institute of Transportation Studies, 2015.
[5] Shaheen S, Cohen A, Zohdy I. Shared mobility:current practices and guiding principles[R]. Washington, DC:US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Adminis-tration, 2016.
[6] 吴洪洋,魏领红,林翊. 2020年中国城市交通发展现状分析[R].北京:交通运输部科学研究院城市交通与轨道交通研究中心, 2021.
[7] Giuffrida N, Le Pira M, Inturri G, et al. Addressing the public transport ridership/coverage dilemma in small cit-ies:A spatial approach[J]. Case Studies on Transport Poli-cy, 2021, 9(1):12-21.
[8] 郭源园,吴磊,曾鹏.都市区建成环境对"共享单车+地铁"通勤使用影响的空间异质性——以深圳市为例[J].热带地理, 2023, 43(5):872-884.
[9] 王政贻,何得桂.共享单车发展面临的主要问题与治理路径研究——基于公共产品理论的视角分析[J].价格理论与实践, 2017(8):140-143.
[10] Brown A. Redefining car access:Ride-hail travel and use in Los Angeles[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2019, 85(2):83-95.
[11] Barajas J M, Brown A. Not minding the gap:Does ridehailing serve transit deserts[J]. Journal of Transport Ge-ography, 2021, 90:102918.
[12] McKane R G, Hess D J. Ridesourcing and urban in-equality in Chicago:Connecting mobility disparities to unequal development, gentrification, and displacement[J]. Environment and Planning A:Economy and Space, 2022, 54(3):572-592.
[13] Young M. Ride-hailing's impact on Canadian cities:Now let's consider the long game[J]. The Canadian Geog-rapher/Le Géographe Canadien, 2019, 63(1):171-175.
[14] McKane R G, Hess D. The impact of ridesourcing on eq-uity and sustainability in North American cities:A sys-tematic review of the literature[J]. Cities, 2023, 133:104122.
[15] Dill J, McNeil N. Are shared vehicles shared by all?A review of equity and vehicle sharing[J]. Journal of Plan-ning Literature, 2021, 36(1):5-30.
[16] Lee Jr D B. Making the concept of equity operational[M]. Iowa:Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Iowa, 1978.
[17] Litman T. Evaluating transportation equity[J]. World Transport Policy & Practice, 2002, 8(2):50-65.
[18] Hay A, Trinder E. Concepts of equity, fairness, and jus-tice expressed by local transport policymakers[J]. Envi-ronment and Planning C:Government and Policy, 1991, 9(4):453-465.
[19] Martens K. Equity considerations in transportation plan-ning[J]. Encyclopedia of Transportation, 2021, 6:154-160.
[20] Martens K. Transport justice:Designing fair transporta-tion systems[M]. London & New York:Routledge, 2016.
[21] 李妮,王建伟.基于公平视角下的交通资源配置研究[J].管理现代化, 2010(1):15-17.
[22] 邹铁钉,叶航.形式公平与运行效率的替代效应——基于实质公平的养老改革[J].经济研究, 2014, 49(3):115-129.
[23] Hauf A, Douma F. Governing dockless bike share:Early lessons for Nice Ride Minnesota[J]. Transportation Re-search Record, 2019, 2673(9):419-429.
[24] Giuffrida N, Pilla F, Carroll P. The social sustainability of cycling:Assessing equity in the accessibility of bikesharing services[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2023, 106:103490.
[25] Anaya-Boig E, Cebollada À, Bueno M C. Measuring spa-tial inequalities in the access to station-based bikesharing in Barcelona using an Adapted Affordability In-dex[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2022, 98:103267.
[26] Tahmasbi B, Haghshenas H. Public transport accessibili-ty measure based on weighted door to door travel time[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2019, 76:163-177.
[27] Laa B, Leth U. Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna:Who they are and how they ride[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 89:102874.
[28] 高枫,李少英,吴志峰,等.广州市主城区共享单车骑行目的地时空特征与影响因素[R]. New York:Schaller Consulting, 2018.
[29] 仝德,周心灿,龚咏喜.基于大数据的上海市共享汽车出行模式研究[J].地理科学进展, 2021, 40(12):2035-2047.
[30] DeMaio P. Bike-sharing:History, impacts, models of provision, and future[J]. Journal of Public Transporta-tion, 2009, 12(4):41-56.
[31] Gehrke S R. Uber service area expansion in three major American cities[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 86:102752.
[32] Schaller B. The new automobility:Lyft, Uber and the fu-ture of American cities[R]. New York:Schaller Consult-ing, 2018.
[33] Clewlow R R, Mishra G S. Disruptive transportation:The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States[R]. California:Insitute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series, 2017.
[34] 俞周瑜,姚晨飞,杨嘉欣,等.共享单车经济的量化分析——以宁波为例[J].数学的实践与认识, 2018, 48(16):100-109..
[35] Wang J, Lindsey G. Neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics and bike share member patterns of use[J]. Journal of transport geography, 2019, 79:102475.
[36] Singleton P A, Goddard T. Cycling by choice or necessi-ty. Exploring the gender gap in bicycling in Oregon[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2016, 2598(1):110-118.
[37] Shaer A, Rezaei M, Moghani Rahimi B. Assessing the COVID-19 outbreak effects on active mobility of men in comparison with women[J]. Journal of Urbanism:Interna-tional Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainabili-ty, 2023, 16(4):480-497.
[38] Teixeira J F, Cunha I. The effects of COVID-19 on fe-male and male bike sharing users:Insights from Lis-bon's GIRA[J]. Cities, 2023, 132:104058.
[39] Mooney S J, Hosford K, Howe B, et al. Freedom from the station:Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2019, 74:91-96.
[40] Zhao D, Ong G P, Wang W, et al. Effect of built environ-ment on shared bicycle reallocation:A case study on Nanjing, China[J]. Transportation research part A:policy and practice, 2019, 128:73-88.
[41] Wei Z, Zhen F, Mo H, et al. Travel behaviours of shar-ing bicycles in the central urban area based on Geo-graphically Weighted Regression:The case of Guang-zhou, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31:54-69.
[42] Deka D. Bicycle justice and urban transformation:Bik-ing for all[J]. Transport Reviews, 2018, 38:2, 270-271.
[43] Abdelwahab B, Palm M, Shalaby A, et al. Evaluating the equity implications of ridehailing through a multi-modal accessibility framework[J]. Journal of Transport Geogra-phy, 2021, 95:103147.
[44] Gehrke S R, Huff M P. Spatial equity implications and neighborhood indicators of ridehailing trip frequency and vehicle miles traveled in the phoenix metro region[J]. Transportation, 2024, 51(1):271-295
[45] Ermagun A, Tilahun N. Equity of transit accessibility across Chicago[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2020, 86:102461.
[46] Brown A E. Prevalence and mechanisms of discrimina-tion:Evidence from the ride-hail and taxi industries[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2019:0739456X19871687.
[47] Palm M, Farber S, Shalaby A, et al. Equity analysis and new mobility technologies:Toward meaningful interven-tions[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2021, 36(1):31-45.
[48] Clark J, Curl A. Bicycle and car share schemes as inclu-sive modes of travel?A socio-spatial analysis in Glasgow[J]. Social Inclusion, 2016, 4(3):83-99.
[49] Jin S T, Kong H, Wu R, et al. Ridesourcing, the sharing economy, and the future of cities[J]. Cities, 2018, 76:96-104.
[50] Aparicio J T, Arsenio E, Henriques R. Understanding the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on public trans-portation travel patterns in the City of Lisbon[J]. Sustain-ability, 2021, 13(15):8342.
[51] Palm M, Allen J, Liu B, et al. Riders who avoided pub-lic transit during COVID-19:Personal burdens and im-plications for social equity[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2021, 87(4):455-469.
[52] Honey-Rosés J, Anguelovski I, Chireh V K, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on public space:An early review of the emerging questions-design, perceptions and ineq-uities[J]. Cities & Health, 2021, 5(Suppl 1):263-279.
[53] Hampshire R C, Gaites C. Peer-to-peer carsharing:Mar-ket analysis and potential growth[J]. Transportation re-search Record, 2011, 2217(1):119-126.
[54] Steiner R L, Bai X, Bejleri I, et al. Partnerships between agencies and transportation network companies for trans-portation-disadvantage populations:Benefits, problems, and challenges[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2021, 2675(12):1260-1271.
[55] Martens K, Golub A. A fair distribution of accessibility:Interpreting civil rights regulations for regional transpor-tation plans[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Re-search, 2021, 41(4):425-444.
[56] Lucas K, Van Wee B, Maat K. A method to evaluate eq-uitable accessibility:Combining ethical theories and ac-cessibility-based approaches[J]. Transportation, 2016, 43:473-490.
[57] 杨宝路,冯相昭.我国共享交通的现状、问题分析与发展建议[J].环境保护, 2017, 45(24):49-52.
[58] Hu J W, Creutzig F. A systematic review on shared mo-bility in China[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2022, 16(4):374-389.
[59] 冯也苏.共享交通对城市交通发展的作用研究[J].城市发展研究, 2017, 24(6):141-144.
[60] Tiznado-Aitken I, Fuenzalida-Izquierdo J, Sagaris L, et al. Using the five Ws to explore bikeshare equity in San-tiago, Chile[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 97:103210.
[61] Narayanan S, Antoniou C. Expansion of a small-scale car-sharing service:A multi-method framework for de-mand characterization and derivation of policy insights[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2022, 104:103438.
[62] Chen Z, Li X. Unobserved heterogeneity in transporta-tion equity analysis:Evidence from a bike-sharing sys-tem in southern Tampa[J]. Journal of Transport Geogra-phy, 2021, 91:102956.
文章导航

/