|
|
|
| On space planning dimensions of resilienct city in response to public emergency |
| WANG Qiao, ZANG Xinyu |
| School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300702, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract: The COVID-19 epidemic has triggered deep thinking among scholars in the field of urban and rural planning. How to build a resilient urban space environment that is conducive to people's physical and mental health has become a hot topic once again. In this paper, concepts of resilient city and healthy city are combed and analyzed. Based on a literature analysis, many common characteristics between the two concepts are presented in terms of environmental, social, managemental aspects, especially in front of the problem of environmental pollution.. In the future, the studies of resilient city and healthy city are supposed to have certain intersection. Moreover, the research on resilient city is more closely related to urban space planning, which makes it easy to develop systematic implementation framework from the perspective of space planning. Combined with the current and future development needs of Chinese cities, this paper proposes the strategies and development approaches of China's resilient urban space planning in four dimensions, namely, form layout, natural environment, public facilities and social life and provides a reference to build a sustainable urban living environment.
|
|
Received: 20 June 2020
|
|
|
|
[1] Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4:1-23.
[2] 臧鑫宇, 王峤. 城市韧性的概念演进、研究内容与发展趋势[J]. 科技导报, 2019, 37(22):94-104.
[3] Cutter S L, Ash K D, Emrich C T. The geographies of community disaster resilience[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 29(29):65-77.
[4] Sharifi A. A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 69:629-647.
[5] Sharifi A, Yamagata Y. On the suitability of assessment tools for guiding communities towards disaster resilience[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2016, 18(Complete):S2212420916302369.
[6] 郭小东, 苏经宇, 王志涛. 韧性理论视角下的城市安全减灾[J]. 上海城市规划, 2016(1):41-44.
[7] Doyle Y G, Tsouros A D, Cryer P C, et al. Practical lessons in using indicators of determinants of health across 47 European cities[J]. Heal Promotion International, 1999, 14(4):289-299.
[8] Barton H, Tsourou C. Healthy urban planning:A WHO guide to planning for people[M]. London:Spon Press, 2000.
[9] 周向红. 欧洲健康城市项目的发展脉络与基本规则论略[J]. 国际城市规划, 2007(4):65-70.
[10] 王峤, 曾坚, 臧鑫宇. 城市综合防灾中的韧性思维与非工程防灾策略[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(6):532-538. |
| [1] |
CHEN Tian, WANG Jiayu, LI Yangli. Urban design strategy for public emergencies from the perspective of healthy city[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(5): 25-35. |
| [2] |
WANG Bo, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Jingqin. Smart city construction and urban governance transformation under public emergencies[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(5): 47-54. |
| [3] |
ZENG Wei, ZHAO Yingjie. Strategy of comprehensive disaster prevention planning in mountainous cities[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(5): 17-24. |
| [4] |
SHI Xiaodong, LI Xiang. Urban safety systems and its application in spatial planning[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(5): 9-16. |
| [5] |
WANG Shifu, ZHANG Xiaoyang, DENG Zhaohua. Resilient response of urban public space to public health emergencies[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(5): 36-46. |
| [6] |
YANG Guiqing. Village planning for responding to public emergencies in the context of resilience[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(5): 74-81. |
|
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 39 
