|
|
Best Selective Scheme for the Filling Station Location of a Certain Mine |
ZHANG Qinli1, XIAO Chongchun1, CHEN Qiusong1, WANG Xinmin1, XU Dan2 |
1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;2. China National Gold Group Corporation, Beijing 100011, China |
|
|
Abstract: Filling station location is a throat engineering of the filling mine. Furthermore, whether or not the location of filling station is reasonable is the key to a new built filling system. In order to solve the problem about the optimal selection of filling station scheme, an evaluation indicator system of filling station scheme is established. The economy, technology, environment, and safety factors are comprehensively considered in order to establish the evaluation indicator system. In the establishment process of comprehensive evaluation index, the methods of on-site research, data analysis, and consultation with experts are used to ensure the reliability of the evaluation indicator system. Then, the basic theories of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy Method (EM), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are adopted to evaluate the filling station scheme for determining the optimal filling station location. During the evaluation process, the AHP is used to decide the subjective weights of evaluation indexes, combining with the objective weights that calculated by EM, the balanced weights are gotten. By that way, the impacts of subjective and objective factors on the weights of evaluation indexes are evened up. Then, the AHP&EM-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation model is established with the basic theory of TOPSIS. Finally, by calculating the superior degrees of each filling station site scheme based on the comprehensive evaluation index, the pros and cons of these schemes are determined. The model is used to optimize and select the filling station scheme for a certain mine,the synthetic superior degrees of three optional schemes are obtained, the degrees are 71.2%, 46.4%,56.3%, respectively. Obviously, the first solution is the best. Based on the mine production practice, it is confirmed that the filling station scheme determined by the method has achieved good economic and social benefits.
|
Received: 04 January 2013
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
BAI Runcai, WANG Huanyu, LI Yanfei, LI Xuejian. Determination of the Composite Coal Mine Initial Trenching Position Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2014, 32(30): 74-79. |
[2] |
CHEN Yuanjiang;YIN Jin. Optimization of mining method based on AHP-TOPSIS[J]. , 2013, 31(7): 57-60. |
[3] |
YU Jian;ZHU Fei. Breaking Interval Preferred Model Based on Uncertainty Measurement Theory[J]. , 2013, 31(35): 28-32. |
[4] |
ZHANG Qinli;CHENG Jian;WANG Xinmin;ZENG Jialong;SONG Guangchen. Mining Method Optimization Based on GRA and Weighted TOPSIS Method[J]. , 2013, 31(31): 38-42. |
[5] |
LI Xibing;WEI Wei;ZHAO Bin. Construction and Quantitative Analysis of Evaluation Index System on Stability of Filling System[J]. , 2013, 31(31): 43-47. |
[6] |
HU Yifu;LIU Longqiong. Evaluation of Regional Phosphate Rock Resources Exploitation Advantages Based on the AHP-TOPSIS Evaluation Model[J]. , 2013, 31(13): 40-44. |
|
|
|
|