专利风险评价指标体系构建及关键指标国际比较

doi:10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2019.14.004

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (2750 KB) HTML^new
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract: Based on the perspective of economic security and the theory of the patent value chain, an assessment system for a set of patent risk indicators is constructed in this paper, to measure the degree of risk encountered by a country or region in patent activities. 4 key indicators of patent basic activities are identified, namely, the patent quality level, the patent transformation ability, the patent dispute risk index, and the patent trade level, and a comparative analysis is carried out among the United States, Japan, South Korea, Germany and China. In conclusion, China's patent development during the years from 2006 to 2015 is "fast but not in a high level", "big but not powerful". Compared with other patent powerful countries, China is not dominant and even in serious risks in the patent value chain of the key nodes in the competition, especially the increasing patent royalty deficit, which poses a certain degree of danger.

Key words： patent risk patent value chain economic security

Received: 07 January 2019

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHENG Yanlin
	LIU Zhipeng
	DAI Tao

Cite this article:

CHENG Yanlin,LIU Zhipeng,DAI Tao. Construction of patent risk assessment indicator system and an international comparison of key indicators[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2019, 37(14): 26-33.

URL:

http://www.kjdb.org/EN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2019.14.004 OR http://www.kjdb.org/EN/Y2019/V37/I14/26

[1] 李卫华, 孔靖平. 中美贸易关系现状分析及前景展望[J]. 改革与战略, 2008, 24(6):99-102.
[2] Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators:A survey[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1990, 28(4):1661-1707.
[3] 黄俊军. 国家经济安全评估方法探析[J]. 浙江统计, 2000(8):16-19.
[4] 顾海兵, 李宏梅, 周智高. 我国国家经济安全监测评估系统的设计[J]. 湖北经济学院学报, 2006, 4(5):5-15.
[5] 房华龙. 国家专利技术竞争力分析方法探讨[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2011(2):63-65.
[6] 曹明, 陈荣, 孙济庆, 等. 基于专利分析的技术竞争力比较研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(3):380-386.
[7] 迈克尔·波特. 竞争优势[M]. 陈丽芳, 译. 北京:中信出版社, 2014.
[8] 姚远, 宋晓燕. 基于自主创新视角的企业专利价值链研究[J]. 科技与法律, 2008(6):41-44.
[9] 董丽, 黄泰康, 袁红梅. 我国制药企业专利价值链管理模型及各环节存在的问题分析[J].中国医药工业杂志, 2012, 43(11):A104-A110.
[10] 黄庆, 曹津燕, 瞿卫军, 等. 专利评价指标体系(一)-专利评价指标体系的设计和构建[J]. 知识产权, 2004, 14(5):25-28.
[11] 张庆, 冯仁涛, 余翔. 专利授权率、经济绩效与技术创新-关于专利契约论的实证检验[J]. 软科学, 2013, 27(3):9-13.
[12] 葛玉珍. 德国专利制度[EB/OL]. (2014-11-10)[2019-01-05]. http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_13d1fc3070102v5xn.html.
[13] 吴红, 常飞. 基于有效专利的我国专利现状分析及对策[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(4):85-89, 51.
[14] 黄伟. 我国科技成果转化绩效评价、影响因素分析及对策研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2013.
[15] 国家知识产权局. 2007年专利统计简报[EB/OL]. (2009-11-18)[2019-01-05]. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/.
[16] 申长雨. 我国有效发明专利拥有量已排世界前三[EB/OL]. (2016-09-19)[2019-01-05], http://www.ce.cn/cysc/zljd/yqhz/201609/19/t20160919_16043615.shtml.
[17] 吴学安. 掌握专利的"游戏规则"[J]. 中外企业文化, 2009(1):58-59.
[18] 董海珍. 专利贸易壁垒的形成与应对分析研究[J]. 环渤海经济瞭望, 2015(7):57-59.
[19] 傅光云. 中国还将稀里糊涂地支付多少专利费[EB/OL]. (2006-07-24)[2019-01-05]. http://finance.people.com.cn/GB/1037/4620170.html.
[20] 世界知识产权组织, 康奈尔大学, 欧洲国际商学院. 2016年全球创新指数[R]. 日内瓦:世界知识产权组织, 2016.
[21] 钱琨, 潘雄锋. 专利制度对经济增长的作用机理及实证研究[J]. 知识产权, 2007, 17(5):42.
[22] 李媛. 缺乏核心技术企业如何强劲"中国芯"[EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://www.bjnews.com.cn/finance/2016/09/19/417228.html.
[23] 张念瑜. 中国缺少核心技术的原因[EB/OL]. (2015-08-06)[2019-01-05]. http://www.360doc.com/content/15/0806/17/10470254_489935497.shtml.
[24] 文心, 王严立玲. 如何祛"专利沉睡"之痛[EB/OL]. (2013-01-05)[2019-01-05]. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrbhwb/html/2013-01/05/content_1180558.htm.
[25] 陈敏. 技术性贸易壁垒中的专利与标准问题研究[J]. 中国标准化(全国标准化优秀论文选集), 2011(9):273-275.