2021年滨水空间生态修复研究与规划建设热点回眸

doi:10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.01.015

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1545 KB) HTML^new
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract: Urban renewal, resilient city construction, protection and restoration of water ecosystems are important issues in the construction of ecological civilization in the new era of China. Waterfront space is an important spatial element for the coordinated development of urban and rural life, production and ecology, which also has a great impact on the quality, environment and ecology of the city. At the same time, the ecological restoration of the waterfront space is closely related to the "double-carbon" goals and promotes each other. This article summarizes the construction of water-suitable cities and reviews the research results of waterfront space among ecological restoration, planning and construction, operation, and management, new technology application and technical specification guide in 2021. On this basis, it proposes that the future research of urban planning and construction should further strengthen the waterfront space value enhancement and the methodology construction of ecological restoration. In addition, interdisciplinary integration and application of new technologies are still important in the future research, and introduction and practice of international advanced concepts should also be emphasized.

Key words： waterfront space ecological restoration urban renewal resilient city land and sea coordination nature-based solutions

Received: 20 October 2021

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Bo
	CHEN Tian
	LI Xiaoyan
	LI Yangli
	LI Yanjun
	LIU Yu
	ZHANG Lei
	HAN Zhen
	DONG Yu
	LI Baojun
	GUO Jiguang

Cite this article:

YANG Bo,CHEN Tian,LI Xiaoyan, et al. Summary of hot spots of research, planning and construction of waterfront space ecological restoration in 2021[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40(1): 204-214.

URL:

http://www.kjdb.org/EN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.01.015 OR http://www.kjdb.org/EN/Y2022/V40/I1/204

[1] 中共中央国务院关于建立国土空间规划体系并监督实施的若干意见[EB/OL].(2019-05-23)[2021-12-23].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-05/23/content_5394187.htm.
[2] 《国土空间规划城市设计指南》行业标准报批稿公示[EB/OL].(2021-05-30)[2021-12-23].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-05/30/content_5613973.htm.
[3] 莫罹,龚道孝,高均海,等.城市水系统从理念、方法到规划实践[J].给水排水, 2021, 57(1):77-83.
[4] 王波,胡滨,牟秋,等.公园城市水系统顶层规划的实践探索——以天府新区为例[J].城市规划, 2021, 45(8):107-112.
[5] 刘杰希,张垒,阮晨.城水融合视角下的沿江轴线规划——以成都沱江发展轴为例[J].规划师, 2021, 37(11):69-75.
[6] Liu S, Lai S Q, Liu C, et al.What influenced the vitality of the waterfront open space? A case study of Huangpu River in Shanghai, China[J].Cities, 2021, 114:103197.
[7] 马童,陈天.城市滨河区空间形态对近地面通风影响机制及规划响应[J].城市发展研究, 2021, 28(7):37-42.
[8] 吴瑾洋.碧道理念下的河道整治景观打造思路——以广州流溪河流域碧道项目为例[J].绿色科技, 2021, 23(9):33-35.
[9] 国土空间规划城市体检评估规程:TD/T 1063-2021[S].北京:中华人民共和国自然资源部, 2021.
[10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.实施城市更新行动[EB/OL].(2020-11-17)[2021-12-23].http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/xinwen/jsyw/202011/20201117_248050.html.
[11] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《大运河文化保护传承利用规划纲要》[EB/OL].(2019-05-09)[2021-12-23].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-05/09/content_5390046.htm.
[12] 国家文物局.国家文物局、文化和旅游部、国家发展和改革委员会联合印发《大运河文化遗产保护传承专项规划》[EB/OL].(2020-09-27)[2021-12-23].http://www.ncha.gov.cn/art/2020/9/27/art_722_163246.html.
[13] 水利部交通运输部国家发展改革委联合印发《大运河河道水系治理管护规划》[EB/OL].(2020-06-11)[2021-12-23].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-06/11/content_5518599.htm.
[14] 生态环境部有关负责人就《大运河生态环境保护修复专项规划》答记者问[EB/OL].(2020-10-09)[2021-12-23].http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk15/20201-0/t20201009_802273.html.
[15] 文化和旅游部、国家发改委联合印发《大运河文化和旅游融合发展规划》[EB/OL].(2020-09-29)[2021-12-23].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-09/29/content_5548-093.htm.
[16] 国家发展改革委等部门关于印发《生态保护和修复支撑体系重大工程建设规划(2021-2035年)》的通知[EB/OL].[2021-12-23].https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/ghwb/202112/t20211222_1308922.html?code=&state=123.
[17] 张令达,侯全华,段亚琼.黄土高原地区流域生态空间管控模式[J].农业工程学报, 2021, 37(10):206-213.
[18] Lee J M, Park M, Park B K, et al.Evaluation of water circulation by modeling:An example of nonpoint source mmanagement in the Yeongsan River watershed[J].Sustainability, 2021, 13(16):8871.
[19] Falkenmark M, Wang-Erlandsson L.A water-functionbased framework for understanding and governing water resilience in the Anthropocene[J].One Earth, 2021, 4(2):213-225.
[20] Saikia P, Beane G, Garriga R G, et al.City water resilience framework:A governance based planning tool to enhance urban water resilience[J].Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021:103497.
[21] 贾梦圆,陈天,臧鑫宇.耦合水资源环境的城镇用地扩张多方案预景与规划路径——以天津市为例[J].城市规划学刊, 2021(3):58-65.
[22] Behboudian M, Kerachian R, Pourmoghim P.Evaluating the long-term resilience of water resources systems:Application of a generalized grade-based combination approach[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 786(2):147447.
[23] 佘年,谢映霞,李迪华.对中国海绵城市建设再出发的若干问题反思[J].景观设计学, 2021, 9(4):82-91.
[24] Wang Y, Liu Z, Wang G, et al.Cellular automata based framework for evaluating mitigation strategies of sponge city[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 796:148991.
[25] 张亮,汤钟,李亚,等.深圳市《海绵城市设计图集》的编制及思考[J].中国给水排水, 2021, 37(10):16-22.
[26] 张佳丽,刘杨,王凤.老旧小区"+海绵"改造的理论与实践——以宁波市三和嘉园小区为例[J].城市发展研究, 2021, 28(7):24-29.
[27] Köster S.How the Sponge City becomes a supplementary water supply infrastructure[J].Water-Energy Nexus, 2021, 4:35-40.
[28] 石佳佳,李伟峰,刘亚丽,等.粤港澳大湾区城镇化对海岸线与海岸带的影响[J].生态学报, 2022, 42(1), doi:10.5846/stxb202011032811.
[29] 林金城,毋亭.20世纪40年代以来福建省大陆海岸带利用程度时空变化分析[J].科技导报, 2021, 39(4):104-111.
[30] 田立鑫,韩美,王敏,等.莱州湾南岸海岸带土地利用时空演变及稳定性研究[J].水土保持研究, 2021, 28(4):259-265.
[31] 吴威,李彩霞,陈雪初.海岸带整治修复驱动下的城市滨海空间景观格局变化及其特征研究——以上海鹦鹉洲生态湿地为例[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 57(4):24-30.
[32] 元冰瑜,高建华,池源,等.1990-2020年江苏省海岸带景观生态状况指数跨尺度时空特征[J].应用生态学报, 2021, doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.016.
[33] 我国首例退港还海实践为城市系上生态"绿丝带"[EB/OL].(2020-12-14)[2021-12-23].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2020-12/14/c_1126858624.htm.
[34] 烟台芝罘湾战略提升及城市设计国际征集资格预审公告[EB/OL].(2021-08-09)[2021-12-23].http://www.bkpmzb.com/bidding/display.php?oid=257&pid=1905.
[35] 黄浦江45公里岸线巡礼首篇,独家回顾徐汇滨江百年魅力[EB/OL].(2018-01-18)[2021-12-23].https://www.jfdaily.com/news/detail?id=77309.
[36] 天津北方网.生态城印象海堤公园建成开放[EB/OL].(2017-08-31)[2021-12-23].http://house.enorth.com.cn/system/2017/08/31/033642756.shtml?utm_source=UfqiNews.
[37] 张天扬.城市的远见——"新遗产保护"于市政景观规划中的践行价值[J].城市建设理论研究(电子版), 2018(34):20.
[38] 徐伟,陈淳,刘建辉,等.海堤生态化建设适宜性评价研究及应用[J].应用海洋学学报, 2021, 40(4):659-668.
[39] 高抒,贾建军,于谦.绿色海堤的沉积地貌与生态系统动力学原理[J/OL].热带海洋学报[2021-12-23].http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk3_rdhyxb/CN/10.11978/YG2021002.
[40] 徐海珏,胡萍,白玉川,等.木本植被覆盖岸坡上波浪爬升过程的数值模拟研究[J].海洋学报, 2020, 42(3):10-24
[41] 关于发布《海岸带生态系统现状调查与评估技术导则》系列团体标准、《海岸带生态减灾修复技术导则》系列团体标准和《围填海工程海堤生态化建设标准》英文版的公告[EB/OL].(2021-10-29)[2021-12-23].http://www.caoe.org.cn/nr/cont.aspx?itemid=209&id=3299.
[42] 王刚,张甲波,白玉川,等.海岸建筑退缩线的综合划定体系——以秦皇岛沿岸为例[J/OL].海洋开发与管理[2021-12-23].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3525.P.20211117.1033.004.html.
[43] 张济婷.从粗放到精细的海岸退缩线划定探索——以珠海市为例[C]//2020/2021中国城市规划年会暨2021中国城市规划学术季2021中国城市规划年会论文集(05城市规划新技术应用).北京:中国城市规划学会, 2021:789-798.
[44] 河海交汇处又现鸟翩跹(推动京津冀协同发展)[EB/OL].(2021-01-12)[2021-12-23].http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2021/0112/c1001-31996328.html.
[45] 杨波,常勤,富楷,等.中新天津生态城临海新城北堤生态廊道工程方案设计[R].天津:AECOM, 2021.
[46] Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, et al.Naturebased solutions to address global societal challenges[M].Gland:IUCN, 2016:97.
[47] 基于自然的解决方案全球标准中文版及中国实践典型案例发布[EB/OL].(2021-06-24)[2021-12-23].http://www.mnr.gov.cn/dt/ywbb/202106/t20210624_2659274.html.
[48] 罗明,应凌霄,周妍.基于自然解决方案的全球标准之准则透析与启示[J].中国土地, 2020(4):9-13.
[49] 罗明,刘世梁,张琰.基于自然的解决方案(NbS)优先领域初探[J].中国土地, 2021(2):4-11.
[50] 王振霖,耿春茂,禹雪中.基于自然解决方案的国际经验及其对河流生态保护的启示[J].环境科学与管理, 2021, 46(8):9-14.
[51] 陶练,熊斯顿.以基于自然的解决方案修复圩田生境——鉴洋湖湿地公园首启区景观实践[J].景观设计学, 2021, 9(4):92-105.
[52] 康濒月,李妹洋,李洪远.NbS在海岸带蓝碳生态系统修复中的案例研究[J].景观设计, 2021(4):10-15.
[53] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于建立以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系的指导意见》[EB/OL].(2019-06-26)[2021-12-23].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-06/26/content_5403497.htm.
[54] 国家发展改革委自然资源部关于印发《全国重要生态系统保护和修复重大工程总体规划(2021-2035年)》的通知[EB/OL].(2020-06-03)[2021-12-23].http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202006/t20200611_2525741.html.
[55] 自然资源部办公厅财政部办公厅生态环境部办公厅关于印发《山水林田湖草生态保护修复工程指南(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].(2020-08-26)[2021-12-23].http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202009/t20200918_2558754.html.
[56] 洱海越发美丽[EB/OL].(2021-03-30)[2021-12-23].http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2021-03/30/nw.D110000renmrb_20210330_6-01.htm.
[57] 吴基昌,平明明,纪道斌,等.城市滨水区多功能规划利用现状与趋势[J].中国农村水利水电, 2021(4):71-74.
[58] Zarfl C, Lumsdon A E, Berlekamp J, et al.A global boom in hydropower dam construction[J].Aquatic Sciences, 2015, 77(1):161-170.
[59] Grill G, Lehner B, Lumsdon A E, et al.An index-based framework for assessing patterns and trends in river fragmentation and flow regulation by global dams at multiple scales[J].Environmental Research Letters, 2015, 10(1):015001.
[60] 张益章,周语夏,刘海龙.国土尺度河流干扰度评价与空间分布制图研究[J].风景园林, 2020, 27(8):10-17.
[61] Grill G, Lehner B, Thieme M, et al.Mapping the world's free-flowing rivers[J].Nature, 2019, 569(7755):215-221.
[62] 河湖生态系统保护与修复工程技术导则:SL/T 800-2020[S].北京:中华人民共和国水利部, 2020.
[63] 《上海市河道规划设计导则》征求公众意见[EB/OL].(2018-11-30)[2021-12-23].https://ghzyj.sh.gov.cn/qtgs/20200110/0032-893501.html.
[64] 广州市国土资源和规划委员会关于公布《珠江景观带重点区段(三个十公里)城市设计与景观详细规划导则》的通知[EB/OL].(2018-08-08)[2021-12-23].http://ghzyj.gz.gov.cn/sjb/xw/tzgg/content/post_4904184.html.
[65] 关于发布《2020年中国城市科学研究会标准研编计划(第二批)》的通知[EB/OL].(2021-01-13)[2021-12-23].http://www.chinasus.org/index.php?c=content&a=show&id=857.
[66] 深圳市碧道设计导则(试行)[EB/OL].(2021-08-31)[2021-12-23].http://swj.sz.gov.cn/xxgk/jsbz/content/post_9095907.html.
[67] Seifert A.Naturnacherer Wasserbau[J].Deutsche Wasserw Irtschaft, 1983, 33(12):361-366.
[68] Ministerium fuer Umwelt Baden-wuettenberg.Stuttgart:Hochw asserschutz und Oekologie[R].Stuttgart:Ministerium fuer Umwelt Baden-wuettenberg, 1988.
[69] 李阳,李小艳,李冰心.广州市南沙区灵山岛尖外江岸线生态提升规划设计[J].广东园林.2021, 43(4):85-89.
[70] 张磊,王刚.莆田市蓝色海湾整治行动项目设计方案[R].北京:正和恒基, 2020.
[71] Lallemant D, Hamel P, Balbi M, et al.Nature-based solutions for flood risk reduction:A probabilistic modeling framework[J].One Earth, 2021, 4(9):1310-1321.
[72] Zhai T L, Wang J, Fang Y, et al.Assessing ecological risks caused by human activities in rapid urbanization coastal areas:Towards an integrated approach to determining key areas of terrestrial-oceanic ecosystems preservation and restoration[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 708:135153.
[73] Cui L, Wang J, Sun L, et al.Construction and optimization of green space ecological networks in urban fringe areas:A case study with the urban fringe area of Tongzhou district in Beijing[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276:124266.
[74] Qiu Y, Schertzer D, Tchiguirinskaia I.Assessing cost-effectiveness of nature-based solutions scenarios:Integrating hydrological impacts and life cycle costs[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 329:129740.
[75] Luan B, Yin R X, Xu P, et al.Evaluating Green Stormwater Infrastructure strategies efficiencies in a rapidly urbanizing catchment using SWMM-based TOPSIS[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 223:680-691.
[76] Dai L, Han Q, de Vries B, et al.Applying Bayesian Belief Network to explore key determinants for naturebased solutions' acceptance of local stakeholders[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 310:127480.
[77] 廖怡.北京香山静宜园见心斋园林三维数字信息模型建构研究[D].北京:北方工业大学, 2021.
[78] 苏玮,林阳阳.海洋生态修复研究进展与热点分析[J].资源节约与环保, 2021(2):13.
[79] Jiao N Z, Cai R H, Zheng Q, et al.Unveiling the enigma of refractory carbon in the ocean[J].National Science Review, 2018, 5(4):459-463.