The successful development of coalbed methane in China is essential to national energy security, coal mining safety and the environment. Creating high conductivity fracture within coal matrix using hydrofracture has been regarded as one of the most effective technologies for coalbed methane development. As a complicated procedure, however, the ability to create fractures with high conductivity is significantly influenced by flowing back, smashing and embedding of the proppant, which can be well represented by the operations in the study area Qinshui basin. The proppant is easily embedded into the surface around the fracture during hydrofracture in highly matured soft coal in Qinshui basin. Hence, conductivity of the generated fracture is dramatically reduced as a result of narrow fracture with embedded proppant. Currently, studies on proppant embedding are mainly conducted in physical experiments, lacking the corresponding numerical models. To analyze the influence of closure pressure and Protodyakonov coefficient on proppant embedding in a numerical method, width formulas and embedded pressure formulas for coal were deduced based on Langmuir law. Experiments for examining the model have been conducted as well. The results show that there is a critical pressure during insertion of the proppant into the coal surface. The smaller the protodyakonov coefficient is, the lower the critical pressure becomes, and the easier the insertion of the proppant is. When the closure pressure was lower than 30 MPa, and only half or even less of the proppant was inserted into the coal, relatively high similarity was obtained between the calculated results from the numerical model and the experimental results. Thereby, the deduced width formulas and embedded pressure formulas are valuable in the hydrofracture design for the high rank coal in Qinshui Basin.
ZHANG Suian
,
CAO Lihu
,
TAN Yangjun
,
LIU Yan
,
WANG Wei
,
HUANG Zhaoxin
. Proppant Embedment Model of High Rank Coal[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2014
, 32(14)
: 54
-58
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.14.008
[1] 高旺来. 不同闭合压力下包衣支撑剂导流能力变化特征的试验研究[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 2006, 28(5): 125-127. Gao Wanglai. Experimental study on the characteristics of flow conductivity of coated proppants under different close pressures[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2006, 28(5): 125-127.
[2] 张毅, 周志齐. 压裂用陶粒支撑剂短期导流能力试验研究[J]. 西安石油 学院学报: 自然科学版, 2000, 15(5): 39-41. Zhang Yi, Zhou Zhiqi. Experimental study on the short-term flow conductiviy of the cracks filled with ceram site fracturing proppant[J]. Journal of Xi'an Petroleum Institute: Natural Science Edition, 2000, 15 (5): 39-41.
[3] 温庆志, 张士诚, 李林地. 低渗透油藏支撑裂缝长期导流能力实验研 究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(2): 97-99. Wen Qingzhi, Zhang Shicheng, Li Lindi. Experimental research fo longterm flow capacity of propping fractures in the low permeability oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(2): 97-99.
[4] 张士诚, 牟善波, 张劲, 等. 煤岩对压裂裂缝长期导流能力影响的实验 研究[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(10): 1441-1448. Zhang Shicheng, Mou Shanbo, Zhang Jing, et al. Experimental evaluation of long-term conductivity of fracturing in coal beds[J]. Acta Geologica Sinaca, 2008, 82(10): 1441-1448.
[5] 连承波, 李汉林. 地应力对煤储层渗透性影响的机理研究[J]. 煤田地质 与勘探, 2005, 33(2): 30-32. Lian Chengbo, Lin Hanlin. Mechanism research about effect of in-situ stress on coalbed permeability[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2005, 33 (2): 30-32.
[6] 傅雪海, 秦勇, 姜波, 等. 山西沁水盆地中、南部煤储层渗透率物理模拟与数值模拟[J]. 地质科学, 2003, 38(2): 221-229. Fu Xuehai, Qin Yong, Jiang Bo, et al. Physical and numerical simulations of permeability of coal reservoirs in central and southern part of the Qinshui Basin, Shanxi[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2003, 38(2): 221-229.
[7] 郭天魁, 张士诚. 影响支撑剂嵌入的因素研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2011, 18 (6): 527-529. Guo Tiankui, Zhang Shicheng. The factors affecting proppant embedment in weak gelling formation[J]. Fault-blocks Oil & Gas Field, 2011, 18(6): 527-529.
[8] 郭建春, 卢聪, 王文耀, 等. 支撑剂嵌入及对裂缝导流能力损害的实验[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(2): 99-101. Guo Jianchun, Lu Cong, Wang Wenyao, et al. Experimental research on proppant embedment and its damage to fractures conductivity[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(2) 99-101.
[9] 刘岩, 张遂安, 石惠宁, 等.支撑剂嵌入不同坚固性煤岩导流能力实验 研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2013, 35(2): 75-78. Liu Yan, Zhang Suian,Shi Huining,et al. Experimental research on flow conductivity of different firmness coal rock embedded by proppant[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2013, 35(2): 75-78.
[10] Huitt J L, Mcglothlin Jr B B. The propping of fractures in formations susceptible to propping sand embedment[C]. Drilling and Production Practice, New York, January 1, 1958.
[11] Lacy L L, Richards A R, Bilden D M. Fracture width and embedment testing in soft reservoir sandstone[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 1996, 13(1): 25-29.
[12] Milton-Taylor D, Stephenson C, Asgian I I. Factors affecting the stability of proppant in propped fractures: Results of a laboratory study[C]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington DC, October 4-7, 1992.
[13] Lacy L L, Richards A R, Ali S A. Embedment and fracture conductivity in soft formations associated with HEC borate and water-based fracture designs[J]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, October 5-8, 1997.
